104,13 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 104,12]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 315 Anm. 3 [103,25-104,17], 320 [104,13-104,15] Alexanderlegende: Bumke 1970a 287 [103,25-104,17] Artus: Gürttler 1976 129 [103,25-104,19] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 335 [103,25-104,17] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Grimm, Walther Ludwig 1897 38 [103,25-104,17], 49 [103,25-104,17], Schröder, Werner 1974a 390 [104,7-104,19], Schröder, Werner 1989j 129 [104,7-104,19] Erzähltechnik: Cucuel 1937 48 [104,7-104,17], Harroff 1974 29 [103,25-104,24], Sauer, M. 1981 184 Anm. 4 [103,25-104,17], Green 1982b 42 [104,10-104,17], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 290-92 [103,25-104,19], Schu 2002 104 [104,10-104,17], Brall-Tuchel 2004 79 [104,7-104,17] Exotisches: Lecouteux 1982c 187 [104,9-104,17] Frauen (allgemein): Miklautsch 1991a 54 s. auch Anm. 85 [104,10-104,16], 55 [103,25-104,17] das Fremde: Brall 1991a 159, [103,25-104,19] Gahmuret: Emmerling 2003 219 [103,28-104,17] Gral: Riessner 1983/84 29 [103,25-104,17], Mergell 1951b 40 [103,25-104,17], Mergell 1952b 40 [103,25-104,17], 51 [103,25-104,17] Handschriftliches: Schirok 1986c 120 [103,25-104,19] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 129 [103,25-104,17] Herzeloyde: Schneider, N. 1935a 50 [104,13-104,14], Heise 1957 59 [103,25-104,24], Eder, Annemarie 1989 201 [104,9-104,16], Meyer zur Capellen 1993 106 [104,10-104,16], Quattrin 1996 26 [104,1-104,30], Niermann 1998 31 [103,25-104,24], 41 [103,25-104,16] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 48-49 [104,10-104,15], Bayer, Hans 1978 64 [104,11-104,14], Bayer, Hans 1981a 162 [104,11-104,17] Ikonographie: Hartmann, Heiko 2000 301 Individualität: Sosna 2003 163 [103,25-104,30] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 97-98 [104,10-104,16] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 823 [103,25-104,24], 836 [104,7-104,16], 837 [104,10-104,15], Weber, G. 1948 53 [103,25-104,16], Zeydel und Morgan 1951 350 [103,25-104,17], 359 [104,11-104,17], Deinert 1960 9 Anm. 1 [104,10-104,16], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1963 58 [104,10-104,15], Roßkopf 1972 22 Anm. 1 [104,9-104,16], 77-102 [104,10-104,16], 129 Anm. 1, 129 [104,10-104,16], 130, [104,10-104,15], 154 [104,13-104,17], 204 [104,10-104,15], 222, 373 [104,11-104,13], Kratz, H. 1973a 189 [102,23-104,30], 204-05 [103,25-104,19], 298 [103,25-104,24], Ortmann 1973 700 [103,25-104,30], Welz 1976 57 [104,7-104,19], Ruh 1980 82 [103,25-104,17], 126 [103,25-104,17], Brall 1983b 112 [103,25-104,13], Wynn 1984 335 [103,25-105,7], Yeandle 1984 418 [103,25-104,17], Haage 1988b 47 [103,28-104,19], 53 Anm. 28 [103,25-104,30], Bräuer 1990 276 [103,25-104,16], Steppich 1993 403 Anm. 35 [104,10-104,17], Haage 1994e 173 [103,25-104,30], Nellmann 1994c 588 [103,25-104,17], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 290-92 [103,25-104,19], 301, Kästner und Schirok 2000a 100 [103,25-104,17], Izumiya 2002 188 [103,25-104,17], Reichert, H. 2002 65-66 [103,28-104,16], Bumke 2004 52 [103,25-104,17] Intertextualität: Hartmann, Heiko 2000 41 [103,25-104,30] Kindheit u. Jugend: Kittler 1991 10 [103,25-104,24], Schultz, J. 1995b 68 Anm. 165 [103,25-104,30] Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 261 [103,25-104,28] Körper u. Körperteile: Ernst 2002 207 [104,7-104,16] Kyot: Ernst 1985 188 [103,25-104,17] Lesarten: Hagen, P. 1900 70-72 [103,25-104,17] Lichtmetaphorik: Cessari 2000 100 Anm. 77 [103,25-104,30] Medizin: Haage 1985a 360 [103,28-104,17], Haage 1986b 138 [103,28-104,17], Haage 1992d 45 [103,25-104,30], 162 [103,28-104,17], 165, 259 Anm. 292 [103,25-104,30], 270 Anm. 356 [103,25-104,30], 308 Anm. 747 [104,10-104,15], Reichert, J. 2001 167 [103,25-104,24] Metonymie: Haferland 2004 44-45 [104,10-104,17] Minne u. Ehe: Poag 1965a 70 [104,10-104,16], Kleber, J. 1992b 187 [104,10-104,17], 189 [104,11-104,14], [104,13-104,17] Naturwissenschaft: Haage 1983a 5 [103,28-104,17], 13, 13 Anm. 38 [104,10-104,15], Haage 1984a 195 [103,28-104,17], Pastré 1991b 246 zitiert als 12,616? [103,28-104,17], Haage 1994e 173 [103,25-104,30] Pädagogik: Essen 1967 69 [103,15-104,30] Parzival: Pörksen, G. und Pörksen, U. 1980 266 Anm. 22 [103,25-104,17] Psychologie: Lichtenstein 1897 67 [103,25-104,17] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 90 [103,25-104,17], Hagen, P. 1900 70-72 [103,25-104,17], Golther 1925a 141 [103,25-104,17], Adolf 1960 98 [103,25-104,19], 196 Anm. 22 [103,25-104,17] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 13 [17,15-127,18], Golther 1925a 177 [103,25-104,17] Religion: San-Marte 1861 260 [103,25-104,17], Groos 1975a 63 [103,25-104,17], Bayer, Hans 1983 367 [104,11-104,17] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 72 [103,25-105,7], Stein, Peter 2000 239 Anm. 642 [103,25-104,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 42 [103,25-104,19], 129 [103,28-104,15], 151 [103,25-104,19], Strässle 2001 268 Anm. 253 [103,25-104,30], Niermann 2004 167-68 [103,25-104,17] Rittertum: Green 1978a 70 [104,10-104,17] Schuld: Kerth, T. 1979 261 [104,10-104,15] Selbstverteidigung: Boigs 1992 14 [103,15-104,30] Sprache: Kraus, C. 1898a 122 Anm. 1 [104,10-104,15], 124 [104,13-104,14], Kraus, C. 1985 122 Anm. 1 [104,10-104,15], 124 [104,13-104,14] Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Stein, W. 1988 73 [104,9-104,17], Krüger, C. 2002 261 [104,8-104,15] Stil: Kratz, H. 1973a 128 [103,25-104,19], Kutzner 1975 58 [104,13-104,16] Suche: Stargardt 1997 86 Anm. 17 [104,10-104,15] Syntax: Mourek 1911 5 [104,10-104,14], Weber, G. 1981 731-32 Anm. 27 [104,11-104,15] Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Lewis 1974 132 [104,8-104,16], Johnson, L. 1978d 299 Anm. 1 [103,25-104,17], Lecouteux 1979b 30 [104,10-104,15], Yeandle 1984 418 [103,25-104,17], Backes, S. 1999 86 [103,25-104,17], McConnell 1999b 273-74 [104,7-104,16], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 300, 301, Harris, N. 2002a 219 [104,10-104,15] Traummotivik: Hatto 1968/69 16-17 [103,25-104,17], Lucae 1878 129-35 [103,25-104,17], Schmitz, Wilhelm 1934 76-80 [103,25-104,24], Hesse, Hans Rudolf 1962 306-09 [103,25-104,30], Bumke 1970a 287 [103,25-104,17], Roßkopf 1972 2 [103,25-104,16], Speckenbach 1976 181-82 [103,25-104,19], 188, Fischer, S. 1978 102 [104,10-104,15], 115-16 [103,25-104,30], 119 [104,9-104,17], 163 [103,25-104,30], Hatto 1980d 183 [103,25-104,17], Benkert-Dodrill 1982 282 [103,25-104,30], Speckenbach 1991 428 Anm. 24 [104,9-104,19], 435 Anm. 45 [104,9-104,19], Haage 1994e 173 [103,25-104,30], Nellmann 1994c 509 [103,25-104,24], 510 [104,10-104,16], 588 [103,25-104,17], 625 [103,25-104,30], 686 [104,10-104,16], Brinker-von der Heyde 1996b 206 [104,7-104,16], Kordt 1997 181 [103,25-104,17], Bachorski 2000 120-21 Anm. 51 [103,25-104,17], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 290-92 [103,25-104,19], Speckenbach 2001 71-72 [103,25-104,30], Haupt, B. 2002a 165 [103,28-104,17], 167 Anm. 11, 167 [104,12-104,16] triuwe: Heckel, H. 1939 43 [104,10-104,19] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 149 [103,25-104,30] übersetzter Abschnitt: Weber, G. 1981 731-32 Anm. 27 [104,11-104,15] Übersetzungsproblematik: Henrotte 1994 118 [103,25-104,19] Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Peschel-Rentsch 1998c 114 [104,11-104,22], Russ 2000 34 [104,13-104,16] Werkstruktur: Sauer, M. 1981 283-84 [103,25-104,16] Wortsinn: Weber, G. 1981 731-32 Anm. 27 [104,11-104,15] Zeitverhältnisse: Lohr 1999 56 [103,25-104,16]
	[Zu 104,14]