135, 8 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 135, 7]
Adaptation: Ehrismann, G. 1927 240 [134,5-135,24], Mergell 1943 34 [135,7-135,12], Pastré 1979 366 [133,23-136,6]
Artusepik: Emmel 1951 75 [133,30-136,8]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 160 [133,30-136,8], Ortmann 1972 29 [133,29-136,8]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Grimm, Walther Ludwig 1897 42 [134,1-135,30], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13]
Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 154 Anm. 16 [135,7-135,15], Green 1982b 124 Anm. 112 [134,23-135,24], Schu 2002 225 [134,5-135,24], 228 [135,3-135,12], 364 Anm. 122 [134,5-136,8], 376 Anm. 151 [135,7-135,12], Urscheler 2002 93 [133,3-137,19], 251 [133,30-136,8]
französischer Wortschatz: Suolahti 1933 317
Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 149 [133,30-136,8]
Geschichte: Snelleman 1941 101 [135,7-135,8]
Gewalt: Lienert 2002a 228 [134,5-135,24]
Grammatik: Yeandle 1984 375-76 [135,7-135,8]
güete: Meissburger 1968 172 Anm. 92 <
Handschriftliches: Yeandle 1984 375-76 [135,7-135,8]
Hartmann von Aue: Golther 1925a 150 [133,29-135,15], Ehrismann, G. 1927 220 [135,7-135,12], Kratz, H. 1973a 25 [135,7-135,12], Wand 1989 15 [134,5-135,15], 18 [135,7-135,8], 23, 27 [134,5-135,15], Nellmann 1994c 527 [133,30-135,24]
höfisches Leben: Brall 1986 568 [135,7-135,13], [134,24-135,24]
Interpretation: Okken 1968 637 [135,7-135,13], Huth 1972 16 [134,5-135,24], Roßkopf 1972 296 [135,7-135,15], 298 [135,7-135,12], Kratz, H. 1973a 219 [134,5-135,24], 220 [134,23-135,12], Mohr 1979j 212 [133,28-136,8], Brall 1983b 208 Anm. 17 [133,29-136,8], Yeandle 1984 375-76 [135,7-135,8], 382 [135,7-135,12], Nellmann 1994c 527 [133,30-135,24], 602 [135,7-135,13], Pratelidis 1994 80 [135,7-135,11], Backes, S. 1999 108 [135,7-135,8], 110 [133,5-135,24], 140 [134,24-135,9], 153 [135,7-135,9], Garnerus 1999 177 [135,7-135,8], Gilmour 2000 320 [135,7-135,11], Hasty 2002c 254 [135,7-135,24]
Intertextualität: Draesner 1993 209 Anm. 35 [135,7-135,9], Huber, C. 1998b 383 [134,5-135,24]
Jagd u. Vogelfang: Dalby 1965 210 [135,7-135,12], 213 [135,7-135,12]
Jeschute: Kinzel 1889 61 [133,30-136,8]
Kyot: Lofmark 1977a 65 Anm. 78 [133,29-135,18]
Minne u. Ehe: Bauß 1938 69 [133,6-135,24], Weigand, H. 1969f 172 [133,5-135,24], Kaiser, Gert 1983 84 [135,7-135,13], Kleber, J. 1992b 236 [135,7-135,12], Riemer, W. und Egert 1992 67 [135,3-135,12], Emmerling 2003 272 [135,7-135,11], 283 [135,7-135,11]
Namen: Mohr 1979q 497
Philologie: Yeandle 1984 375-76 [135,7-135,8], Eichholz 1987 79 [135,7-135,8]
Quellen - allgemein: Singer, S. 1916 81 [135,7-135,8], Weber, G. 1928 35 [135,7-135,13], Brown, A. 1943 194 [135,7-135,11], Yeandle 1984 375-76 [135,7-135,8]
Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 15 [133,29-135,15], 44 [135,7-135,13], Rachbauer 1934 37 [133,29-135,15], Bauß 1938 69 [133,6-135,24], Rachbauer 1970 37 [133,29-135,15], Rachbauer 1980 37 [133,29-135,15]
Reim: Yeandle 1984 375-76 [135,7-135,8]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Ebenbauer 1979a 396 zitiert als 125, 7ff. [135,7-135,12]
Rittertum: Green 1978a 55 [135,7-135,8]
Soziologie: Margetts 2002 536 [134,5-135,12], [133,29-136,8]
Sprache: Barufke 1995 182
Stil: Kloocke, H. 1974 51 [134,27-135,23]
Tafelrunde: Spiewok 1977 595, Yeandle 1984 375-76 [135,7-135,8], Spiewok 1986c 607
Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Gilmour 2000 38 [135,7-135,11]
Überlieferung: Kühnel 1972 187 [135,7-135,8]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Mohr 1958b 22 [134,23-136,8], Mohr 1966a 318 [134,23-136,8], Mohr 1979e 93 [134,23-136,8], Delabar 1990 286 [135,7-135,9], Sutter 2003 110 [133,30-136,6], 203 [134,6-135,15]
Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Nellmann 1994c 527 [133,30-135,24]
 [Zu 135, 9]