135,22 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 135,21]
Adaptation: Ehrismann, G. 1927 240 [134,5-135,24], Mergell 1943 38 Anm. 54, 43 [135,22-135,24], Pastré 1979 366 [133,23-136,6]
Artusepik: Emmel 1951 75 [133,30-136,8]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 160 [133,30-136,8], Ortmann 1972 29 [133,29-136,8]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Grimm, Walther Ludwig 1897 42 [134,1-135,30], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13]
Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 154 [135,16-135,24], Green 1982b 71, 71 Anm. 45 [135,21-135,24], 72 Anm. 46, 81 [135,21-135,24], 115 [135,21-135,22], 124 Anm. 112 [134,23-135,24], Schu 2002 225 [134,5-135,24], 229 [135,20-135,24], 364 Anm. 122 [134,5-136,8], Urscheler 2002 93 [133,3-137,19], 251 [133,30-136,8]
ethischer Wortschatz: Maurer 1951b 199
Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 149 [133,30-136,8]
Gebärde u. Geste: Peil 1975 278 Anm. 65 [135,21-135,24]
Gewalt: Lienert 2002a 228 [134,5-135,24], 231 [135,21-135,24]
Handschriftliches: Yeandle 1984 386-87
Hartmann von Aue: Nellmann 1994c 527 [133,30-135,24]
höfisches Leben: Brall 1986 568 [134,24-135,24]
Interpretation: Zutt 1968 183 [135,21-135,24], Huth 1972 16 [134,5-135,24], Roßkopf 1972 298 [135,21-135,24], Kratz, H. 1973a 219 [134,5-135,24], 220 [135,13-135,24], Mohr 1979j 212 [133,28-136,8], Ruh 1980 141 [135,20-135,24], Huber, H. 1981 282 Anm. 282 [135,12-135,24], Brall 1983b 208 Anm. 17 [133,29-136,8], Yeandle 1984 292, 370, 384 [135,18-135,24], 386-87, 387, 417 [135,19-135,24], 422, Eichholz 1987 50 [135,21-135,24], 54 [135,21-135,24], Schirok 1988c 443 [135,19-135,24], Nellmann 1994c 527 [133,30-135,24], 528, Raucheisen 1997 167 Anm. 731, Backes, S. 1999 110 [133,5-135,24], Hasty 2002c 254 [135,7-135,24]
Intertextualität: Draesner 1993 266 [135,21-135,24], Huber, C. 1998b 383 [134,5-135,24]
Ironie: Yeandle 1984 386-87
Jeschute: Kinzel 1889 61 [133,30-136,8]
Litotes: Yeandle 1984 386-87
Minne u. Ehe: Bauß 1938 69 [133,6-135,24], Weigand, H. 1969f 172 [133,5-135,24], Emmerling 2003 272 [135,20-135,24]
Namen: Mohr 1979q 472
Pferde u. Pferdeschmuck: Ohly 1985b 867 [135,21-135,24], Ohly 1989a 78 [135,21-135,24], Ohly 1995b 332 [135,21-135,24]
Philologie: Yeandle 1984 386-87
Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 37 [135,21-135,24]
Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 15 [135,21-135,24], 39 [135,21-135,24], Rachbauer 1934 37 [135,19-135,24], 175 [135,20-135,24], Bauß 1938 69 [133,6-135,24], Rachbauer 1970 37 [135,19-135,24], 175 [135,20-135,24], Rachbauer 1980 37 [135,19-135,24], 175 [135,20-135,24], Yeandle 1984 386-87, Eichholz 1987 51 [135,21-135,24]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 134 [135,20-135,24], Kern, Peter 1981 320 Anm. 31 [135,21-135,24], Parshall 1981 101 [135,19-135,24], Schirok 1982 92 [135,20-135,24], Lorenz, A. 2002 219-20 [135,21-135,24]
Rittertum: Green 1978a 47 [135,20-135,24], 50 [135,21-135,24], Backes, S. 1999 104 [135,21-135,24]
Sigune: Gibbs 1972 56 Anm. 7 [135,20-135,24], Braunagel 1999 44 [135,20-135,24]
Soziologie: Margetts 2002 536 [133,29-136,8]
Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Stein, W. 1988 83 [135,16-135,24]
Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 88 [135,21-135,24], Kloocke, H. 1974 51 [134,27-135,23]
Suche: Wilson 1988 158 [135,16-135,24]
Titurel: Ehrismann, G. 1927 290 [135,20-135,24]
Überlieferung: Kühnel 1972 192
Vergewaltigung: Meister 1991 25 [135,20-135,24]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Mohr 1958b 22 [134,23-136,8], Mohr 1966a 318 [134,23-136,8], Mohr 1979e 93 [134,23-136,8], Sutter 2003 110 [133,30-136,6]
Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Nellmann 1994c 527 [133,30-135,24]
 [Zu 135,23]