144,26 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 93 [144,23-144,30], 209 [144,26-144,27] Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 12 [144,26-144,27], 16 [144,23-145,2], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 386 [144,17-145,6], Rachbauer 1934 40 [144,23-145,6], 41 [144,23-144,29], Mergell 1943 13 [144,23-144,29], 49 Anm. 73 [144,23-145,25], Rachbauer 1970 40 [144,23-145,6], 41 [144,23-144,29], Rachbauer 1980 40 [144,23-145,6], 41 [144,23-144,29] Artus: Gürttler 1976 134 [144,23-144,29] Artusepik: Gürttler 1976 134 [144,23-144,29], Schultz, J. 1983 89 [144,17-145,5] Bibelmotivik: Wolf, A. 1995 40 [144,23-145,7] Buch II: Hartmann, Heiko 2000 206 Buch III: Kühnel 1972 167 [144,26-144,27], [144,20-145,6], Siefken 1972 112 [144,23-145,2], 113 [144,17-145,2], Yeandle 1984 412 [144,26-144,29], 414 [144,26-144,29], Eichholz 1987 91 [144,17-147,10], 92-93 [144,20-145,5], 94 [144,23-144,27], 95, 140 [144,20-145,6] Charakterisierung: Sosna 2003 174 [144,20-145,6] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13], Cucuel 1937 98 [144,23-145,2] Erzähltechnik: Cucuel 1937 98 [144,23-145,2], Mergell 1943 13 [144,23-144,29], 49 Anm. 73 [144,23-145,25], Siefken 1972 112 [144,23-145,2], 113 [144,17-145,2], Hirschberg 1976 146 [144,17-147,10], Parshall 1981 184 [144,17-145,5], Groos 1995 72 [144,23-145,2], Wolf, A. 1995 40 [144,23-145,7] Frauenfiguren: Lewis 1975 481 [144,17-145,7] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Russ 2000 59 [144,26-144,27] Gahmuret: Cucuel 1937 98 [144,23-145,2] Gattung: Groos 1995 72 [144,23-145,2] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 127 [144,23-145,6], 223 [144,23-145,5] Handschriftliches: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 93 [144,23-144,30], 209 [144,26-144,27] Herzeloyde: Lewis 1975 481 [144,17-145,7] höfischer Roman: Gürttler 1976 134 [144,23-144,29] Humor: Kant 1878 12-13 [144,20-145,5] Individualität: Sosna 2003 174 [144,20-145,6] Interpretation: Schultz, J. 1983 89 [144,17-145,5], Wynn 1984 246 Anm. 54 [144,17-145,6], Ohly 1985b 898 [144,23-144,29], Ohly 1989a 92 [144,23-144,29], Groos 1995 72 [144,23-145,2], Ohly 1995b 349 [144,23-144,29] Intertextualität: Draesner 1993 230 [144,20-145,6] Jüngerer Titurel: Parshall 1981 184 [144,17-145,5] Kindheit u. Jugend: Russ 2000 59 [144,26-144,27] Kommentar: Yeandle 1984 412 [144,26-144,29], 414 [144,26-144,29], Eichholz 1987 91 [144,17-147,10], 92-93 [144,20-145,5], 94 [144,23-144,27], 95, 140 [144,20-145,6], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 206 Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 12 [144,26-144,27], 16 [144,23-145,2], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 386 [144,17-145,6] Metrik: Kraus, C. 1902 209 Namen: Kraus, C. 1902 209 Naturwissenschaft: Ohly 1985b 898 [144,23-144,29], Ohly 1989a 92 [144,23-144,29], Groos 1995 72 [144,23-145,2], Ohly 1995b 349 [144,23-144,29] Parenthese: Cucuel 1937 98 [144,23-145,2] Pferde u. Pferdeschmuck: Segelcke 1969 181 zitiert als 144,16, Ohly 1985b 898 [144,23-144,29], Ohly 1989a 92 [144,23-144,29], Ohly 1995b 349 [144,23-144,29] Pflanzen u. Pflanzensymbolik: Ohly 1985b 898 [144,23-144,29], Ohly 1989a 92 [144,23-144,29], Ohly 1995b 349 [144,23-144,29] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 12 [144,26-144,27], 16 [144,23-145,2], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 386 [144,17-145,6] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 12 [144,26-144,27], 16 [144,23-145,2], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 386 [144,17-145,6], Rachbauer 1934 40 [144,23-145,6], 41 [144,23-144,29], Rachbauer 1970 40 [144,23-145,6], 41 [144,23-144,29], Rachbauer 1980 40 [144,23-145,6], 41 [144,23-144,29] Quellen - Keltisches: Mühlhausen 1924 479 [144,20-144,27], Goetinck 1975 92 Anm. 116 [144,23-144,27] Raum u. Bewegung: Glaser 2004 135 [144,23-144,27] Reim: Kraus, C. 1902 209, Cucuel 1937 98 [144,23-145,2] Religion: Groos 1995 72 [144,23-145,2], Wolf, A. 1995 40 [144,23-145,7] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Gürttler 1976 134 [144,23-144,29], Parshall 1981 184 [144,17-145,5], Unger, R. 1990 100 [144,17-147,8], Russ 2000 59 [144,26-144,27] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Strässle 2001 378 Anm. 608 [144,23-145,6] Richtungskonstruktionen: Wießner 1902 39 [144,26-144,27] Rittertum: Groos 1995 72 [144,23-145,2] Rüstung: Cucuel 1937 98 [144,23-145,2] Schwanritter: Unger, R. 1990 100 [144,17-147,8] Sprache: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 12 [144,26-144,27], 16 [144,23-145,2], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 386 [144,17-145,6], Mergell 1943 13 [144,23-144,29], 49 Anm. 73 [144,23-145,25] Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Ohly 1985b 898 [144,23-144,29], Ohly 1989a 92 [144,23-144,29], Ohly 1995b 349 [144,23-144,29] tumpheit: Strässle 2001 378 Anm. 608 [144,23-145,6] Überlieferung: Kühnel 1972 167 [144,26-144,27], [144,20-145,6], Stephan-Chlustin 2004 93 [144,23-144,30], 209 [144,26-144,27] Utopie: Unger, R. 1990 100 [144,17-147,8] Verskunst: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 79 [144,23-145,6] elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Cucuel 1937 98 [144,23-145,2], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 206, Russ 2000 59 [144,26-144,27] Wappenkunde: Cucuel 1937 98 [144,23-145,2] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 146 [144,17-147,10], Schultz, J. 1983 89 [144,17-145,5] Wortschatz: Cucuel 1937 98 [144,23-145,2], Segelcke 1969 181 zitiert als 144,16
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)