146,21 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 146,20]
Abbildungen: Schirok 1988d 128 [145,7-147,10], Stephan-Chlustin 2004 94 [146,19-146,29] Adaptation: Hilka 1932 636 [146,20-146,24], Mergell 1943 50 Artus: Christoph 1989 27 [146,13-147,8] Artusepik: Emmel 1951 80 Charakterisierung: Groos 1995 77 [146,19-146,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Wolff, L. 1924 182 [146,19-148,18], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13], Wolff, L. 1967e 186 [146,19-148,18], Eichholz 1987 91 [144,17-147,10] Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 146 [144,17-147,10], Schmid, E. 1976 16 Anm. 41 [146,13-147,8], Stein, A. 1993 90 Anm. 136 [146,19-147,8], 112 Anm. 183 [145,29-147,8], Groos 1995 77 Anm. 15 [146,21-146,25], 77 [146,19-146,30], Schu 2002 260 [145,8-147,10], Urscheler 2002 128 [146,20-146,30] Gebärde u. Geste: Peil 1975 215 [146,20-146,25] Gral: Westphal 2000 210 [146,20-146,24] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 144-45, Joos und Whitesell 1951 89 Herrschaft: Schmidt, K. 1978 187 [146,21-147,8], Classen 1998n 847 [146,20-147,8], Schröder, J. 2004 164 [146,19-147,8] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Bayer, Hans 1981a 156 Humor: Braune 1899 198-200 [146,21-146,27] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 148-49 [146,13-147,8], 162 [146,4-147,10], Pastré 1993f 365 [146,13-147,8] Interpretation: Braune 1899 198-200 [146,21-146,27], Joos und Whitesell 1951 89, Zeydel und Morgan 1951 346 [146,21-146,24], Huth 1972 24 [146,20-146,21], [146,5-147,8], Roßkopf 1972 157 [146,20-146,25], 163 Anm. 2 [146,21-146,24], Kratz, H. 1973a 224 [145,7-147,8], Eichholz 1987 116, 122-24 [146,20-147,2], 197, 198 [146,19-147,2], Pratelidis 1994 141 [146,19-146,28], 198 [146,20-146,21], [146,20-146,30], Okken 1996a 249 [146,19-146,30], Garnerus 1999 24 [146,20-146,24], 231 [146,20-146,21], Blank 2000 139 [145,7-147,10] Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 200 Anm. 797 [146,13-146,24] Juristisches: Braune 1899 198-200 [146,21-146,27], Schmidt-Wiegand 1968 167 [146,20-146,30], Eichholz 1987 122-24 [146,20-147,2], 245 [146,20-147,20], Groos 1995 77 Anm. 15 [146,21-146,25], 77 [146,19-146,30], Gilmour 2000 77 Kindheit u. Jugend: Russ 2000 55 Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 257 [146,19-147,8] Männerfiguren: Groos 1995 77 [146,19-146,30] Personenbeziehungen: Delabar 1994 325 [146,20-146,24] Philologie: Eichholz 1987 124 Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 59 [146,21-147,8], 102, Fiore 1967 210 Anm. 20 [146,20-146,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 16 [146,21-146,23], Braune 1899 198-200 [146,21-146,27], Rachbauer 1934 76 [146,13-146,21], Rachbauer 1970 76 [146,13-146,21], Rachbauer 1980 76 [146,13-146,21], Eichholz 1987 91 [144,17-147,10], 122-24 [146,20-147,2] Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Sivertson 1999a 190 [146,20-146,30] Religion: Bayer, Hans 1983 89 [146,20-147,8] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 135 [146,13-148,14], Gürttler 1976 289 [145,7-147,8], Unger, R. 1990 100 [144,17-147,8] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 148 [146,20-146,30] Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 425 [145,9-147,30] Rittertum: Sacker 1963 34 [146,13-147,10] Sprache: Ide 1996 211 [146,20-146,28], 221 [146,20-146,25] Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 119 Anm. 1, Gilmour 2000 77 Suche: Wilson 1988 153 [146,20-146,25] Syntax: Horacek 1952c 280 Anm. 28, 290 [146,5-147,8], 299, Horacek 1964 98 Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Speckenbach 1975 458 [146,20-147,8] triuwe: Schmid, E. 1976 146 [146,14-146,30] Überlieferung: Naß 1987 119 [146,8-147,25], Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 147 [146,8-147,25] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 39 [146,19-146,30], Bertau 1983i 222 [146,20-146,21], Delabar 1990 93 [146,13-147,8] Wortschatz: Mersmann 1971 97 [146,20-146,30], 105 [146,20-146,25], 287 [146,20-146,25] Wortsinn: Joos und Whitesell 1951 89, Gilmour 2000 77
	[Zu 146,22]