148,14 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 148,13]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 94 [147,27-149,4], 95 [147,27-148,18]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 51 [148,9-148,14], 53 [148,9-148,14]
Charakterisierung: Pastré 1994c 95 [148,8-148,14]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Wolff, L. 1924 182 [146,19-148,18], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13], Wolff, L. 1967e 186 [146,19-148,18]
Erzähltechnik: Schwartzkopff 1909 78 [147,29-150,26], Green 1980b 106, Schu 2002 260 [147,30-148,18], Urscheler 2002 95 [147,30-148,18], 120 [147,30-148,18], 129 [148,8-148,14]
Grammatik: Yeandle 1984 12 [148,9-148,18], Gilmour 2000 149 [148,13-148,14]
Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 165 [148,1-148,18]
Interpretation: Kratz, H. 1973a 224 [147,11-149,24], Eichholz 1987 127 [148,13-148,14], 138 [148,13-148,14], 139 [148,9-148,14], Huby, Michel 1989 266 Anm. 45 [148,9-148,18], Pratelidis 1994 202 [148,9-148,14], Blank 1999 222 [148,9-148,18], Garnerus 1999 28 [147,10-148,21]
Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 96 [148,13-148,14], Weber, G. 1928 40 [148,13-148,14]
Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 18 [148,13-148,14], Rachbauer 1934 43 [148,13-148,14], Rachbauer 1970 43 [148,13-148,14], Rachbauer 1980 43 [148,13-148,14], Eichholz 1987 139 [148,9-148,14]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 135 [146,13-148,14]
Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Stein, W. 1988 90 [148,13-148,16]
Syntax: Mourek 1911 5 [148,13-148,14]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 103 Anm. 71 [148,13-148,14]
 [Zu 148,15]