160, 1 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 159,30]
Abbildungen: Schirok 1988d 128 [158,17-161,3] Adaptation: Wilmotte 1933b 44 Anm. 1 [160,1-160,30], Kellermann, W. 1936 169 [159,22-160,30], Mergell 1943 54 [159,29-160,30], 216 [159,29-160,30], Johnson, L. 2000 198 [159,20-160,3] Artus: Schirok 1989c 76 [159,29-160,30] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 35 [160,1-160,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13], Nellmann 1994c 550 [160,1-160,30] Erzähltechnik: Lofmark 1981 104 [159,25-161,2], Parshall 1981 185 [159,20-160,30], Green 1982b 75 Anm. 59 [159,5-161,3], Schu 2002 198 Anm. 213 [159,29-160,30], 230 Anm. 36 [159,20-161,3] Fiktionalität: Grünkorn 1994 160 Anm. 40 [159,20-161,3] Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 146 [159,28-161,3] Gebärde u. Geste: Leicher 1927 114 [159,20-160,30], Leicher 1977 114 [159,20-160,30] Ginover: Gibbs 1972 232 [160,1-160,30] Gottfried von Straßburg: Haruta 1978 324 [160,1-160,30] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 141 [159,26-161,3], 164 [160,1-160,3] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 800 [159,29-160,30], 833 [160,1-160,30], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1963 83 [160,1-160,30], Huth 1972 33 [159,29-160,2], Kratz, H. 1973a 227 [159,29-160,30], Ortmann 1973 705 [160,1-160,30], Mohr 1979j 214 [160,1-160,30], Green 1980a 391 [159,20-161,3], Johnson, L. 1982 84 [159,20-160,30], Yeandle 1984 276 [160,1-160,30], Schirok 1986a 170 [159,20-160,30], Eichholz 1987 251 [159,5-161,8], 262 [159,29-160,1], Mohr 1989 299 [160,1-160,30], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 105 [159,29-160,30], Nellmann 1994c 543 [160,1-160,30], [159,13-161,8], 625 [160,1-160,30], Pratelidis 1994 72-73 [160,1-160,8], 78 [159,20-160,30], 205 [159,20-161,3], 206 Anm. 29 [160,1-160,30], Garnerus 1999 245 [160,1-160,30], 246 [160,1-160,30], Gilmour 2000 309 [160,1-160,30], Pappas 2001 164 Anm. 25 [160,1-160,30], Izumiya 2002 188 [159,29-160,25], 193 [159,29-160,25], Johnson, L. 2002 201 [159,20-160,30], Schirok 2002a 89 [160,1-160,15] Ither: Hunter 1982 110 Anm. 2 [160,1-160,30] Jagd u. Vogelfang: Hatto 1971 112 Anm. 8 [159,29-160,30], Hatto 1980c 347 Anm. 8 [159,29-160,30] Minne u. Ehe: Karg, I. 1993b 99 [160,1-160,30] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 102 [159,25-160,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 21 [159,5-161,8], Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 1 [159,4-160,30], Rachbauer 1934 51-52 [159,5-161,8], Rachbauer 1970 51-52 [159,5-161,8], Rachbauer 1980 51-52 [159,5-161,8], Eichholz 1987 251 [159,5-161,8] Quellen - Keltisches: Loomis 1949 406 Anm. 51 [159,20-161,2], Goetinck 1975 83 Anm. 95 [160,1-160,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 363, Stein, Peter 2000 109 Anm. 289 [159,29-160,30] Rhetorik: Pastré 1979 10-11 [160,1-160,30] Richtungskonstruktionen: Wießner 1902 44 [159,29-160,2] Rittertum: Green 1978a 71 Anm. 3 [159,20-161,30] Schuld: Schröder, F. 1959 17 [159,20-161,3], Schröder, F. 1966 365 [159,20-161,3] Selbstverteidigung: Boigs 1992 13, 13 Anm. 59 [160,1-160,30], 15 [160,1-160,30] Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 92 [159,29-160,30], Weber, G. 1928 47 [159,25-160,8], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 206 [159,13-161,8] Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Speckenbach 1975 458 [160,1-160,30] triuwe: Heckel, H. 1939 50 [160,1-160,30] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 81 Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 39 [160,1-160,30], Delabar 1990 75 [159,4-161,8], 84 [159,4-161,8], Seiffert 1990 178 [159,29-160,30], Sutter 2003 59 Anm. 235 [160,1-160,30] Werkstruktur: Eichholz 1987 251 [159,5-161,8]
	[Zu 160, 2]