160,24 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 160,23]
Abbildungen: Schirok 1988d 128 [158,17-161,3] Adaptation: Wilmotte 1933b 44 Anm. 1 [160,1-160,30], Kellermann, W. 1936 169 [159,22-160,30], Mergell 1943 54 [159,29-160,30], 216 [159,29-160,30] Artus: Schirok 1989c 76 [159,29-160,30] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 330 [160,3-160,30], Ortmann 1972 35 [160,1-160,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13], Nellmann 1994c 550 [160,1-160,30] Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 179 [160,3-160,30], Lofmark 1981 104 [159,25-161,2], Parshall 1981 185 [159,20-160,30], Green 1982b 75 Anm. 59 [159,5-161,3], 83 Anm. 85 [160,11-160,30], Schu 2002 198 Anm. 213 [159,29-160,30], 230 Anm. 36 [159,20-161,3], 262 [160,11-160,30] Fiktionalität: Grünkorn 1994 160 Anm. 40 [159,20-161,3] Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 146 [159,28-161,3] Gebärde u. Geste: Leicher 1927 114 [159,20-160,30], 120 [160,24-160,26], Leicher 1977 114 [159,20-160,30], 120 [160,24-160,26] Ginover: Gibbs 1972 232 [160,1-160,30] Gottfried von Straßburg: Haruta 1978 324 [160,1-160,30] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 17 [160,24-160,25], 165 [160,24-160,25] Herrschaft: Schmidt, K. 1978 187-88 [160,16-160,30], Schröder, J. 2004 173 [160,20-160,26] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 141 [159,26-161,3] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 800 [159,29-160,30], 833 [160,1-160,30], Scholte 1934b 18, Schröder, Walter Johannes 1963 83 [160,1-160,30], Huth 1972 24 [160,3-160,30], 31 [160,3-160,30], Roßkopf 1972 158 [160,3-160,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 227 [159,29-160,30], Ortmann 1973 705 [160,1-160,30], Mohr 1979j 214 [160,1-160,30], Green 1980a 391 [159,20-161,3], Bradley, R. 1981 227 Anm. 22 [160,3-160,30], Huber, H. 1981 12 [160,24-160,26], Johnson, L. 1982 84 [159,20-160,30], Brall 1983b 222 [160,3-160,30], Pérennec 1984f 201 [160,24-160,30], Yeandle 1984 276 [160,1-160,30], Schirok 1986a 170 [159,20-160,30], Eichholz 1987 208 [160,3-160,30], 251 [159,5-161,8], 254 [160,3-160,30], 259 [160,3-160,30], 260-62 [160,3-160,30], 268-69 [160,24-160,25], Mohr 1989 299 [160,1-160,30], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 105 [159,29-160,30], Nellmann 1994c 543 [160,1-160,30], [159,13-161,8], 625 [160,1-160,30], 686 [160,3-160,30], Pratelidis 1994 78 [159,20-160,30], 189 [160,24-160,30], 205 [159,20-161,3], 206 Anm. 29 [160,1-160,30], Garnerus 1999 245 [160,1-160,30], 246 [160,1-160,30], Gilmour 2000 309 [160,1-160,30], Pappas 2001 164 Anm. 25 [160,1-160,30], Izumiya 2002 188 [159,29-160,25], 193 [159,29-160,25], Johnson, L. 2002 201 [159,20-160,30] Ither: Gross, N. 1966 299-300 [160,3-160,30], Hunter 1982 110 Anm. 2 [160,1-160,30] Jagd u. Vogelfang: Hatto 1971 112 Anm. 8 [159,29-160,30], Hatto 1980c 347 Anm. 8 [159,29-160,30] Keie: Gowans 1988 97 [160,24-160,25] Kindheit u. Jugend: Russ 2000 58 [160,18-160,25] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Bock, L. 1879 27 [160,24-160,25], Eichholz 1987 268-69 [160,24-160,25] Minne u. Ehe: Kleber, J. 1992b 241 [160,24-160,25], Riemer, W. und Egert 1992 81 Anm. 50 [160,20-160,30], Karg, I. 1993b 99 [160,1-160,30], Öhlinger 2001 98 Anm. 101 [160,24-160,30] Pflanzen u. Pflanzensymbolik: Hartmann, Heiko 2000 233 Philologie: Eichholz 1987 268-69 [160,24-160,25] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 96 [160,3-160,30], 102 [159,25-160,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 21 [159,5-161,8], Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 1 [159,4-160,30], Rachbauer 1934 51-52 [159,5-161,8], Rachbauer 1970 51-52 [159,5-161,8], Rachbauer 1980 51-52 [159,5-161,8], Eichholz 1987 251 [159,5-161,8] Quellen - Keltisches: Loomis 1949 406 Anm. 51 [159,20-161,2], Goetinck 1975 83 Anm. 95 [160,1-160,30] Rache: Möbius 1993 263 [160,24-160,26] Religion: Mockenhaupt 1942 56 [160,3-160,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 56 [160,3-160,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Thomas, J. 1972a 430 [160,3-160,30], Stein, Peter 2000 109 Anm. 289 [159,29-160,30] Rhetorik: Pastré 1979 10-11 [160,1-160,30], 77 [160,24-160,26] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Sieverding 1985 232 [160,3-160,30], 233 Anm. 1 [160,24-160,30] Rittertum: Green 1978a 71 Anm. 3 [159,20-161,30], Groos 1995 83 [160,3-160,30] Schönheit: Schmid, E. 2004 236-37 [160,24-160,30] Schuld: Schröder, F. 1959 17 [159,20-161,3], Schröder, F. 1966 365 [159,20-161,3] Selbstverteidigung: Boigs 1992 13 Anm. 59 [160,1-160,30], 15 [160,1-160,30] Sprache: Barufke 1995 112, Hübner, G. 2000 96 Anm. 27 [160,14-160,30] Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 92 [159,29-160,30], Weber, G. 1928 253 [160,3-160,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kratz, H. 1973a 99 [160,24-160,25], Kloocke, H. 1974 64 [160,24-160,25], 66 [160,24-160,25], 101 [160,24-160,25], Kutzner 1975 65 [160,24-160,26], 189 [160,24-160,26], 206 [159,13-161,8], Wehrli 1980 307 [160,24-160,26], Yeandle 1984 58, Eichholz 1987 260-62 [160,3-160,30], Wehrli 1997 307 [160,24-160,26] Syntax: Eichholz 1987 268-69 [160,24-160,25], Thim-Mabrey 1990 391 [160,24-160,25] Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Speckenbach 1975 458 [160,1-160,30] triuwe: Heckel, H. 1939 50 [160,1-160,30], Schmid, E. 1976 158 Anm. 225 [160,3-160,30] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 81 [160,3-160,30] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 124 [160,23-160,28], 134 [160,4-161,2], Rolle 2001 141 Anm. 7 Übersetzungsproblematik: Eichholz 1987 268-69 [160,24-160,25] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 39 [160,1-160,30], Delabar 1990 75 [159,4-161,8], 84 [159,4-161,8], 85 [160,18-160,30], Seiffert 1990 178 [159,29-160,30], Sutter 2003 59 Anm. 235 [160,1-160,30] Werkstruktur: Eichholz 1987 251 [159,5-161,8] Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 50 Wortsinn: Singer, S. 1898a 425 [160,24-160,25], Singer, S. 1985 425 [160,24-160,25], Gilmour 2000 64
	[Zu 160,25]