161,23 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 161,22]
Abbildungen: Schirok 1985 197, 200 Adaptation: Hilka 1932 647 [161,23-161,26], Mergell 1943 36 Anm. 48, 48 [161,23-161,27], Wehrli 1954 21-25 [161,9-163,2], Wolf, A. 1972 80 Anm. 10 [161,23-161,30], Huby, Michel 1975a 42 >, Hilgers 1983 68, Wolf, A. 1999g 256 Anm. 10 [161,23-161,30], Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16], Schmid, E. 2002a 100 [161,23-161,27] Architektur: Lichtenberg 1931 78 [161,23-161,28], 80 [161,23-161,30], Wiesinger 1976a 243-44 [161,23-162,14], Wiesinger 1976b 98-99 [161,23-162,14] Ausgabenmethodik: Bumke 1970a 22 Charakterisierung: Ringeler 2000 126 [161,23-162,5] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13] Erzähltechnik: Schäfer, J. 1972 225 Anm. 11 [161,23-161,27], Parshall 1981 17 [161,23-161,30], Green 1982b 64, Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16], 20 [161,23-161,30], Mertens, V. 2001 104 [161,23-161,27], Lieb 2002b 118 >, Urscheler 2002 197 [161,23-162,5], Klein, D. 2003b 17 [161,23-162,5] Geographie: Wynn 1961a 35 Anm. 1 [161,23-161,24], Wynn 1984 147 Anm. 64 [161,23-161,24] Gral: Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 263 [161,23-161,24] Grammatik: Hartmann, Heiko 2000 86 Handschriftliches: Hirschberg 1976 62 [161,23-163,16], Gilmour 2000 20, 194 Individualität: Sosna 2003 176 [161,23-161,30] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 221 [161,23-162,14] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 800 [161,23-162,5], 998 [161,23-161,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 229 [161,23-162,5], Wynn 1984 94 [161,23-161,24], Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16], Schmid, E. 2000b 58 [161,23-162,5], Shockey 2002 71 [161,23-161,30], 149 [161,23-161,30] Ironie: Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16] Kindheit u. Jugend: Geering 1899 21 [161,23-161,30] Kommentarmethodik: Green 2002d 478 [161,9-163,16] Kommunikation: Schnyder, M. 2003 295 [161,23-161,30] Lesarten: Gilmour 2000 20 Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Gilmour 2000 20 [161,23-161,30] Pferde u. Pferdeschmuck: Ohly 1985b 901 Anm. 84 [161,10-162,13], Ohly 1989a 93 Anm. 84 [161,10-162,13], Ohly 1995b 350 Anm. 86 [161,10-162,13] Psychologie: Meyer zur Capellen 1993 114 [161,23-162,5] Quellen - Chrétien: Rochat 1858 90 [161,23-161,27], Lichtenstein 1897 21 [161,23-161,27], Golther 1925a 153 [161,23-161,30], Rachbauer 1934 83 [161,23-161,28], Hatto 1947 243 [161,23-162,11], 244 [161,23-162,11], Rachbauer 1970 83 [161,23-161,28], Hatto 1980g 152 [161,23-162,11], 153 [161,23-162,11], Rachbauer 1980 83 [161,23-161,28] Raum u. Bewegung: Wynn 1961b 398 [161,23-161,24], Jäger, D. 1998 30 [161,23-164,5], 259 [161,23-162,26], Glaser 2004 73 [161,23-163,16], 271 [161,23-161,30] Religion: Groos 1975a 57 [161,23-161,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Schirok 1982 143 Rittertum: Green 1978a 71 Anm. 3 [159,20-161,30], Ehrismann, O. 1995 173 > Schuld: Dimler 1970 129 [161,5-162,1] Sprache: Gilmour 2000 20 Stil: Weber, G. 1928 250 Anm. 378 [161,9-162,26], Wehrli 1954 21-25 [161,9-163,2], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Wehrli 1969d 199-202 [161,9-163,2] Syntax: Horacek 1952c 279 [161,23-161,24], Horacek 1964 71 [161,23-161,24] Überlieferung: Braune 1899 194, Hartl 1928 9, Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 105 [160,29-162,22], 134 [161,5-162,2], Okken 2003 230, 231 Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Peschel-Rentsch 1998c 120 Anm. 64 [161,23-162,7] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 61 Anm. 9, 61 [161,23-161,30], 62 [161,23-163,16], Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16] Wortschatz: Ehrismann, O. 1995 173 > Zeitverhältnisse: Rührmund 1848 466 <, Lohr 1999 60 [161,23-161,24], Gilmour 2000 20
	[Zu 161,24]