162,28 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 162,27]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 97 [162,27-163,2] Adaptation: Mergell 1943 68 Anm. 107, Wehrli 1954 21-25 [161,9-163,2], Wolf, A. 1985a 33 [162,28-163,2], Wolf, A. 1999h 296 [162,28-163,2], Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16], 35 [162,27-163,6] Charakterisierung: Pastré 1994c 97, Gilmour 2000 17 zitiert als 162,25 Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Boesch 1977 36 [162,1-162,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13] Erzähltechnik: Parshall 1981 265 Anm. 48, Wolf, A. 1995 43, Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16], Schu 2002 192 Anm. 196 [162,6-163,9], Urscheler 2002 198 Anm. 221 [162,27-162,28], 199 [162,20-163,16] Geographie: Greub, W. 1974 253 [162,28-162,30] Handschriftliches: Hirschberg 1976 62 [161,23-163,16] Hartmann von Aue: Wand 1989 146 [162,20-163,14], 169 [162,20-163,14], 176 [162,20-163,14] Humor: Coxon 2002 132 Anm. 63 [162,27-163,2] Interpretation: Kratz, H. 1973a 229 [162,6-163,2], Wieners 1973 175 Anm. 162, Schmidt, J. 1974 381 Anm. 15, Green 1980a 365 Anm. 78 [162,27-163,2], Huber, H. 1981 176, Green 1982a 42 [162,27-162,28], 64 [162,27-163,2], 76 Anm. 33 [162,27-162,28], 77 Anm. 51 [162,27-163,2], Johnson, L. 1999 336 [162,27-163,2], Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16], 35, [162,27-163,6], Schirok 2002a 89 Anm. 79 Ironie: Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16], 35 Kindheit u. Jugend: Geering 1899 23 [162,27-163,2], Russ 2000 52, 62 [162,27-163,2] Kommentarmethodik: Green 2002d 478 [161,9-163,16] Medizin: Haferlach 1991 57 Anm. 10 Oxymoron: Gilmour 2000 35 Parzival: Gilmour 2000 17 zitiert als 162,25 Quellen - Chrétien: Rochat 1858 90 [162,27-162,30], Lichtenstein 1897 21 [162,27-162,28], Rachbauer 1934 54 [162,15-163,18], 83 [162,27-163,6], Rachbauer 1970 54 [162,15-163,18], 83 [162,27-163,6], Rachbauer 1980 54 [162,15-163,18], 83 [162,27-163,6] Raum u. Bewegung: Jäger, D. 1998 30 [161,23-164,5], Glaser 2004 73 [161,23-163,16] Reim: Zwierzina 1898a 469 Anm. 1 [162,27-162,28], Cucuel 1937 30 [162,27-162,28], Zwierzina 1985 469 Anm. 1 [162,27-162,28], Gilmour 2000 35 Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 139 [162,26-163,6], Jürgens-Lochthove 1980 148 [162,27-163,2] Rittertum: Reuter, H. 1971 102 Anm. 343 [162,20-163,18], Reuter, H. 1975 72 Anm. 343 [162,20-163,18] Schuld: Nowak 1968b 42 [162,27-162,28] Sprache: Barufke 1995 155, Ide 1996 100 [162,27-162,30] Stil: Wehrli 1954 21-25 [161,9-163,2], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Wehrli 1969d 199-202 [161,9-163,2] tumpheit: Rupp, H. 1957a 100, Haas, A. 1964 84, Gilmour 2000 17 zitiert als 162,25 Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 134 [162,5-163,2] Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Peschel-Rentsch 1998c 113 Anm. 53 [162,27-162,28] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 62 [161,23-163,16], Gilmour 2000 8-10 [161,9-163,16] Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 84, Büchel 1925 39 [162,27-162,28], 44, Trier 1931a 248 [162,27-162,28], 249, 257 [162,27-162,28], 266 [162,27-162,28], 267 [162,27-162,28], 268 [162,27-162,28], Trier 1973 248 [162,27-162,28], 249, 257 [162,27-162,28], 266 [162,27-162,28], 267 [162,27-162,28], 268 [162,27-162,28] Wortsinn: Pretzel 1982 114 [162,27-162,28], Gilmour 2000 35 Zeitverhältnisse: Hartmann, Heiko 2000 413 [162,28-162,29]
	[Zu 162,29]