164,18 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 164,17]
Adaptation: Wolf, A. 1985a 30 [164,12-164,26], 31 [164,14-164,26], 32, 33 [164,12-164,26], Wolf, A. 1999h 293 [164,12-164,26], 294, [164,14-164,26], 295 [164,12-164,26], Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16] Bibelmotivik: Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16], 69, [164,12-164,20] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 105 [164,11-164,26] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 117 [164,12-164,20], Ortmann 1972 129 [164,11-164,21], Johnson, L. 1978a 279 [164,12-164,20], 280 [164,5-164,23], 281 [164,16-164,20], Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [164,12-165,4], Gilmour 2000 26 [163,17-166,16], 136-37 [163,17-166,16] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Wolff, L. 1924 182 [164,5-167,4], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13], Cucuel 1937 10, Wolff, L. 1967e 186 [164,5-167,4] Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 69 [164,12-164,26], 73 Anm. 21 [164,12-164,26], 97, Green 1981a 115 Anm. 22, Wolf, A. 1995 50 [164,17-164,18] Gottfried von Straßburg: Haruta 1978 150 Anm. 26 [164,12-164,26] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 75, Yeandle 1984 269 [164,17-164,18], Gilmour 2000 20, 67 [164,17-164,18] Herzeloyde: Lewis 1975 481 [164,6-164,20] höfisches Leben: Wenzel, H. 1986a 282 [164,5-164,26] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 111 [164,12-164,20], 178 [164,17-164,18] Interpretation: Mersmann 1971 128 [164,11-165,4], Kratz, H. 1973a 230 [164,11-165,2], Huber, H. 1981 85 [164,12-165,2], 177 [164,12-164,20], Pratelidis 1994 210 [164,2-164,26], Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16], 61 [164,11-165,4], 67-68, 132 [164,11-164,21], 267 [164,12-164,26] Ironie: Gilmour 2000 67-68 jâmer: Gilmour 2000 67 [164,17-164,18] Kindheit u. Jugend: Russ 2000 49 Anm. 187 [164,6-164,26], 62 [164,8-164,18], [164,12-164,20] Kleidung, Mode, Textilien: Bertelt 1936a 22 [164,17-164,18], Raudszus 1985 114 [164,17-164,18], Gilmour 2000 120 Memoria: Remscheid 1999 166 [164,17-164,18] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 22 [164,11-164,23], Rachbauer 1934 54 [164,11-165,14], Rachbauer 1970 54 [164,11-165,14], Rachbauer 1980 54 [164,11-165,14] Religion: Mockenhaupt 1942 37, 39, Mockenhaupt 1968 37, 39, Gilmour 2000 67-68 Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 139 [164,11-166,20], Belitz 1978 364 Anm. 34 [164,11-164,26], Margetts 1987 36 Anm. 8 [163,16-166,30] Rittertum: Reuter, H. 1971 102 Anm. 343 [164,5-164,26], Reuter, H. 1975 72 Anm. 343 [164,5-164,26], Vogt, D. 1985 42 [164,5-164,26] schame: Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16] Schönheit: Heckel, H. 1939 93 [164,2-165,30], Gilmour 2000 62-63 [164,11-164,26], 92 Anm. 76 [164,11-164,26], 167 [164,11-164,26] Soziologie: Sowinski 1993 121 [164,12-164,20] Sprache: Moebius 1898 40 [164,17-164,18], Hübner, G. 2000 97 Anm. 32 [164,14-164,18] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 261 [164,9-164,23], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 65-66 [164,12-164,18], Gilmour 2000 67-68 Syntax: Kordt 1997 129 tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 84 Überlieferung: Kühnel 1972 176, Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 105 [162,29-164,26] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 62 [164,9-165,4] Wortsinn: Gilmour 2000 67-68, 75, 104 zuht: Gilmour 2000 33 [163,17-166,16]
	[Zu 164,19]