164,20 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 164,19]
Adaptation: Wolf, A. 1985a 30 [164,12-164,26], 31 [164,14-164,26], 33 [164,12-164,26], Wolf, A. 1999h 293 [164,12-164,26], 294 [164,14-164,26], 295 [164,12-164,26], Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16] Bibelmotivik: Eichholz 1987 118 Anm. 1 [164,19-164,20], Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16], 68-69 [164,19-164,20], 69 [164,12-164,20] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 105 [164,11-164,26] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 95 [164,19-164,20], 117 [164,12-164,20], 324 [164,19-164,20], Ortmann 1972 72 Anm. 31 [164,19-164,21], 129 [164,11-164,21], Johnson, L. 1978a 279 [164,12-164,20], 280 [164,5-164,23], 281 [164,16-164,20], Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [164,12-165,4], Eichholz 1987 118 Anm. 1 [164,19-164,20], Gilmour 2000 26 [163,17-166,16], 136-37 [163,17-166,16] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Wolff, L. 1924 182 [164,5-167,4], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13], Wolff, L. 1967e 186 [164,5-167,4] Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 69 [164,12-164,26], 73 Anm. 21 [164,12-164,26], Green 1981a 115 Anm. 22, Green 1982b 275 [164,19-164,20], Gilmour 2000 69-70 ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 204 [164,19-164,20] Gottfried von Straßburg: Haruta 1978 150 Anm. 26 [164,12-164,26] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 89, Gilmour 2000 69-70 Handschriftliches: Yeandle 1984 72, Gilmour 2000 34 Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 255 Herzeloyde: Lewis 1975 481 [164,6-164,20] höfisches Leben: Wenzel, H. 1986a 282 [164,5-164,26] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 111 [164,12-164,20] Interpretation: Schwietering 1961/62 119 [164,19-164,20], Schwietering 1969l 461 [164,19-164,20], Mersmann 1971 128 [164,11-165,4], Kratz, H. 1973a 230 [164,11-165,2], Wieners 1973 36 [164,19-164,20], Bradley, R. 1981 228 Anm. 22 [164,19-164,20], Huber, H. 1981 85 [164,12-165,2], 177 [164,12-164,20], 283 Anm. 292, Eichholz 1987 118 Anm. 1 [164,19-164,20], Pratelidis 1994 210 [164,2-164,26], Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16], 61 [164,11-165,4], 68-69 [164,19-164,20], 132 [164,11-164,21], 267 [164,12-164,26] Interpunktion: Gilmour 2000 69-70 Intertextualität: Yeandle 2002a 170 Anm. 3 [164,19-164,20] Kindheit u. Jugend: Russ 2000 49 Anm. 187 [164,6-164,26], 62 [164,12-164,20] Periphrase u. Umschreibung: Gilmour 2000 68-69 [164,19-164,20] Philologie: Yeandle 1984 119, 168, 189, 401, Eichholz 1987 145 Anm. 1 Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 22 [164,11-164,23], Rachbauer 1934 54 [164,11-165,14], Rachbauer 1970 54 [164,11-165,14], Rachbauer 1980 54 [164,11-165,14] Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Gilmour 2000 68-69 [164,19-164,20] Religion: Eichholz 1987 118 Anm. 1 [164,19-164,20] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 139 [164,11-166,20], Belitz 1978 364 Anm. 34 [164,11-164,26], Margetts 1987 36 Anm. 8 [163,16-166,30] Rittertum: Reuter, H. 1971 102 Anm. 343 [164,5-164,26], Reuter, H. 1975 72 Anm. 343 [164,5-164,26], Vogt, D. 1985 42 [164,5-164,26] schame: Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16] Schönheit: San-Marte 1862b 154 [164,19-164,20], Heckel, H. 1939 93 [164,2-165,30], Gilmour 2000 62-63 [164,11-164,26], 68-69 [164,19-164,20], 92 Anm. 76 [164,11-164,26], 132 [164,19-164,20], 167 [164,11-164,26] Soziologie: Sowinski 1993 121 [164,12-164,20] Sprache: Gilmour 2000 65 Stil: Weber, G. 1928 261 [164,9-164,23], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Syntax: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 99 Anm. 6, Gilmour 2000 69-70 Überlieferung: Hartl 1928 10, 11, Kühnel 1972 206, Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 105 [162,29-164,26] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 62 [164,9-165,4] Wortsinn: Zimmermann, Gisela 1974 220, Gilmour 2000 69-70 zuht: Gilmour 2000 33 [163,17-166,16]
	[Zu 164,21]