168,10 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 168, 9]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 97 [168,2-168,20], 103 [168,9-168,14] Adaptation: Mergell 1943 56 [166,21-168,19], Gilmour 2000 91-93 [166,17-169,20], 119 [168,1-168,20] Ausgabenmethodik: Bumke 1970a 23 Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 120 [168,1-168,19], Johnson, L. 1978a 279 [168,7-169,4], Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [168,7-169,4], Yeandle 1984 354 [168,7-169,4], Gilmour 2000 119 [168,1-168,20] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Kästner 1978 192 [168,1-168,19] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13] Erzähltechnik: Green 1982b 208 Anm. 114 [168,1-168,23], Urscheler 2002 199 [166,11-169,4] Erziehung: Brall-Tuchel und Haussmann 2003 22 [168,1-168,20] Farben u. Farbensymbolik: Jacobsohn 1915 89 [168,9-168,12], 160 [168,9-168,14], Ehrismann, G. 1927 231 [168,2-168,20], Pastré 1994e 233 [168,2-168,14] französischer Wortschatz: Wiener 1895 344, Suolahti 1933 322 Frauen (allgemein): Weinhold 1882b 200 Anm. 3 [168,3-168,19], Weinhold 1968b 200 Anm. 3 [168,3-168,19] Gral: Delcourt-Angélique 1977 93 [168,5-168,19] groteske Figuren: Michel 1976 283 Anm. 91.1 [168,1-168,27] Handschriftliches: Hirschberg 1976 62 [166,12-169,4] Hartmann von Aue: Wand 1989 142 [168,1-168,19], Gilmour 2000 119 [168,1-168,20] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 180 [168,1-168,19] höfisches Leben: Gilmour 2000 119 [168,1-168,20] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 179 [168,2-168,19], Pastré 1993d 68 [168,2-168,14] Interpretation: Kratz, H. 1973a 214 Anm. 19 [168,1-168,19], 230 [168,1-169,2], Huber, H. 1981 85 [168,1-168,27], 237 Anm. 39 [168,9-168,14], Green 1982a 81 Anm. 123 [168,1-168,19], Steppich 1993 405 Anm. 39 [168,1-168,19], Gilmour 2000 91-93 [166,17-169,20], 119 [168,1-168,20], 124-25 Interpunktion: Kordt 1997 24, Gilmour 2000 124 [168,9-168,12] Intratextualität: Gilmour 2000 123-24 [168,9-168,14] Inzest: Buschinger 1985a 130 [168,2-168,19], Buschinger 1994d 51 [168,2-168,19], Buschinger 1995e 41 Anm. 73 [168,2-168,19], Buschinger 1995h 70 [168,2-168,19], Buschinger 2001h 81 [168,2-168,20] Kleidung, Mode, Textilien: Bertelt 1936a 22-24 [168,1-168,19], 27 [168,2-168,19], Jones, G. 1956 64 Anm. 6 [168,1-168,14], Lehmann-Langholz 1985 48 [168,1-168,20], Raudszus 1985 114 Anm. 497 [168,2-168,19], Brüggen 1989 61 Anm. 171 [168,9-168,12], 82 Anm. 220 [168,9-168,14], 125 [168,1-168,19], 242 [168,9-168,14], 247 [168,9-168,12], 261 [168,9-168,12], 286 [168,9-168,12], Brüggen 1993 207 [168,1-168,19], Nellmann 1994c 545 [168,2-168,19], 546, Speckner 1995 31-32 [168,1-168,19], Gilmour 2000 91-93 [166,17-169,20], 92-93 Anm. 81 [168,2-168,20], 119 [168,1-168,20], 123-24 [168,9-168,14], 124-25 Litotes: Gilmour 2000 124-25 Metrik: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 114 Anm. 1 [168,1-168,20] Minne u. Ehe: Karg, I. 1993b 101 [166,21-168,20], Gilmour 2000 91-93 [166,17-169,20] Parataxe: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 104-05 Anm. 3 Parenthese: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 102 Anm. 1 [168,10-168,11], 104 [168,10-168,11], Cucuel 1937 35, Lühr 1991 184 [168,9-168,12] Philologie: Schmidt, E. 1979 382 Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 23 [168,2-168,14] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Neumann, F. 1964 33 Anm. 1 [168,9-168,12], Neumann, F. 1969b 167 Anm. 2 [168,9-168,12], Belitz 1978 342 Anm. 112 [168,2-168,19], Kern, Peter 1981 225 Anm. 37 [165,15-169,20], Schröder, Werner 1986b 237 [168,9-168,12], Schröder, Werner 1989ak 607 [168,9-168,12], Gilmour 2000 124 [168,9-168,12] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Strässle 2001 388 Anm. 653 [168,2-168,19] Ritterethik: San-Marte 1862b 69 [168,1-168,19] Rittertum: Bumke 1964c 241 Anm. 14 [168,2-168,19], Vogt, D. 1985 42 [168,1-169,4], Gilmour 2000 51 [168,1-168,20] Schönheit: Gilmour 2000 91-93 [166,17-169,20] Sprache: Barufke 1995 109 [168,9-168,12], Gilmour 2000 124-25 Stil: Kinzel 1874 9, Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 112 [168,1-168,20], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Yeandle 1984 81, 308, Gilmour 2000 81, 124-25, 325 Syntax: Singer, S. 1898a 421, Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 104 [168,10-168,11], Horacek 1964 242 [168,9-168,14], Kashiwagi 1970 12 Anm. 2 [168,9-168,12], Yeandle 1984 308, Singer, S. 1985 421, Gilmour 2000 124 [168,9-168,12] tumpheit: Gilmour 2000 91-93 [166,17-169,20] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 105 [167,3-168,27], 110 > Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 62 [166,12-169,4], Schultz, J. 1983 90 [168,1-168,20] Wirnt von Grafenberg: Gilmour 2000 124 [168,9-168,12] Wortschatz: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 138, Heinzle 1972 188, Vorderstemann 1974b 361, Schröder, Werner 1978b 602, Nellmann 1994c 546 Wortsinn: Gilmour 2000 124-25
	[Zu 168,11]