177,30 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) 
Adaptation: Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Rachbauer 1934 60 [177,11-178,26], Mergell 1943 38 Anm. 54, Mohr 1958a 212 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Rachbauer 1970 60 [177,11-178,26], Pastré 1978 80 [177,9-179,6], Mohr 1979b 12 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Pastré 1979 366 [177,9-179,6], Rachbauer 1980 60 [177,11-178,26], Pérennec 1984f 204 [177,27-178,5], Wolf, A. 1985a 35 [175,8-179,12], 41 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Wolf, A. 1999h 298 [175,8-179,12], 304 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3]
Analphabetentum: Horacek 1954b 142
Anfortas: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3]
Architektur: Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26]
Artusepik: Pérennec 1984f 204 [177,27-178,5], Schirok 1988b 12 [177,27-178,7], Roßnagel 1996 159 [177,27-178,3], Ringeler 2000 133 [177,27-178,3]
Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 550 [177,30-178,1], [177,27-178,26], 554 [177,30-178,5]
Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 97 Anm. 14 [177,29-177,30], 112 [177,23-178,24], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3], Ortmann 1972 33 [177,13-178,26], Ringeler 2000 133 [177,27-178,3], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3], Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26]
Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3]
Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Wells, D. 1994 325 [177,15-178,25]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], 118 [177,27-178,26], Sutter 2003 81 Anm. 314. Zitiert als 177,29, 86 [177,27-178,16], 203 [177,25-178,26], 249 zitiert als 177,29
Erzähler: Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3]
Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 38 Anm. 54, Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Ortmann 1972 33 [177,13-178,26], Dewald 1975 97 Anm. 14 [177,29-177,30], 112 [177,23-178,24], Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12], Schmid, E. 1976 88 [177,4-178,26], Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3], Green 1980b 125, Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Green 1982b 9 [177,30-178,3], 68 [177,30-178,3], 73 Anm. 52 [177,30-178,1], 73 [177,29-178,3], 84 [177,27-178,3], Lieb 2002b 123 [177,14-179,6], Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 234 Anm. 48 [177,27-178,3], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26]
Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3]
Forschungsbericht: Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3]
Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 146 [177,13-178,26], 161 Anm. 4 [177,13-178,26]
Frauenfiguren: Braunagel 2001 53 Anm. 96, Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3]
das Fremde: Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26]
Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 366
Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3]
Gattung: Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 234 Anm. 48 [177,27-178,3], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26]
Gawan: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3]
Gawan-Handlung: Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3]
Gebärde u. Geste: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26]
Gefühle: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26]
Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 236 [177,9-178,26]
Geschichte: Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 183 [177,27-178,5], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], 184, 185
Gottfried von Straßburg: Schirok 2004b 27 [177,29-178,3]
Gral: Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26], Dewald 1975 97 Anm. 14 [177,29-177,30], 112 [177,23-178,24]
Hartmann von Aue: Wand 1989 112, Schirok 2004b 27 [177,29-178,3]
Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26]
Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26]
Hilfe u. Rat: Mohr 1954a 186 [177,30-178,3], Mohr 1979d 50 [177,30-178,3]
höfischer Roman: Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3], Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 234 Anm. 48 [177,27-178,3], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26]
höfisches Leben: Mersmann 1971 203 [177,30-178,1]
Individualität: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3]
indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 206 [177,27-178,26]
Interpretation: Bauer, G. 1963 67 [176,28-179,12], Mohr 1965b 186 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Mersmann 1971 203 [177,30-178,1], Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 183 [177,27-178,5], Dewald 1975 97 Anm. 14 [177,29-177,30], 112 [177,23-178,24], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26], Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26], Mohr 1979h 150 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Green 1982b 9 [177,30-178,3], 68 [177,30-178,3], 73 Anm. 52 [177,30-178,1], 73 [177,29-178,3], 84 [177,27-178,3], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], 184, 185, Pérennec 1984f 204 [177,27-178,5], Schirok 1988b 12 [177,27-178,7], Czerwinski 1989 124 [177,27-178,26], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 109 [175,7-179,12], Roßnagel 1996 159 [177,27-178,3]
Intertextualität: Schirok 1988b 12 [177,27-178,7], Wand 1989 112, Draesner 1993 236 s. auch Anm. 90 [177,27-178,5], 247 [177,27-178,26], 422 [177,27-178,3]
Ironie: Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3]
Ither: Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 183 [177,27-178,5]
Jüngerer Titurel: Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], 184, 185, Lorenz, A. 2002 206 [177,14-178,26]
Kommentar: Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 550 [177,30-178,1], [177,27-178,26], 554 [177,30-178,5], Backes, S. 1999 157 [177,28-178,3], Garnerus 1999 46, Gilmour 2000 77 [177,27-178,10], 249, 261 [177,9-178,26], 272 [177,27-178,26], 309 [177,27-178,26], 309-10 [177,27-178,3], 310, 311
Kommentarmethodik: Carey 2003 301 [177,14-179,12]
Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 262 [177,25-178,26], Lasch und Liebig 2002 77 Anm. 26 [177,14-178,26], Lieb 2002b 123 [177,14-179,6]
Kyot: Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3], Pérez Varas 2000 45
Lesarten: Lomnitzer 1972 114 Anm. 25
Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 909 [177,27-178,13], Johnson, L. 1999 344 [177,12-178,26], Bertau 1972/73 909 [177,27-178,13]
Männerfiguren: Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3]
Märchen: Junk 1912 131
Metrik: Kraus, C. 1902 214, Lomnitzer 1972 114 Anm. 25
Minne u. Ehe: Bauer, G. 1963 67 [176,28-179,12], Schumacher, Marlis 1967 80 Anm. 11 [177,29-178,3], Dewald 1975 97 Anm. 14 [177,29-177,30], 112 [177,23-178,24], Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3], Schnell, Rüdiger 1985a 131 [177,29-178,3], Kleber, J. 1992b 249 [177,14-178,5], Riemer, W. und Egert 1992 71 [177,27-178,3], Spiewok 1994b 156 [177,27-178,26], Spiewok 1995b 300 [177,27-178,26], Fritsch-Rößler 1999 234, Öhlinger 2001 51 Anm. 16 [177,29-178,3], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3]
Namen: Kraus, C. 1902 214, Nitze und Williams, H. 1955 268, Kleiber 1962 82, Rosenfeld, Hellmut 1971 207, Rosenfeld, Hellmut 1974 44, Mohr 1979q 465, Green 1980b 125, Schröder, Werner 1982b 24, Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], 184, 185, Rosumek 1989 192, 194 [177,27-178,3], Chandler 1992 164, Braunagel 1999 43 Anm. 110, Pérez Varas 2000 45, Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26]
Parodie: Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26]
Parzival: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3]
Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 251 Anm. 76 [177,30-178,3]
Psychologie: Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26]
Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 11, 60, Griffith 1911 80 Anm. 1, Junk 1912 131, Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26], Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], 184, 185, Wells, D. 1994 325 [177,15-178,25], Pérez Varas 2000 45
Quellen - Chrétien: Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Rachbauer 1934 60 [177,11-178,26], Hatto 1949 383 Anm. 2, Rachbauer 1970 60 [177,11-178,26], Hatto 1980g 341 Anm. 45, Rachbauer 1980 60 [177,11-178,26], Sutter 2003 81 Anm. 314. Zitiert als 177,29, 86 [177,27-178,16], 203 [177,25-178,26], 249 zitiert als 177,29
Raum u. Bewegung: Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26]
Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Mersmann 1971 203 [177,30-178,1]
Reim: Kraus, C. 1902 214
Religion: Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3]
Rezeption (allgemein): Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Kölbing 1869 151 [177,9-179,12], Nyholm 1964 366, Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26], Kern, Peter 1981 251 Anm. 76 [177,30-178,3], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], 184, 185, Schirok 1988b 12 [177,27-178,7], Roßnagel 1996 159 [177,27-178,3], Lorenz, A. 2002 206 [177,14-178,26], Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Spreckelsen u.a. 1997 618, Wagemann 1998 134 [176,30-178,30], 196 [177,27-178,26]
Rhetorik: Pastré 1979 366 [177,9-179,6], Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26]
Ritterethik: Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3]
Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26]
Rittertum: Green 1978a 51 [177,27-178,5], Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3]
Schionatulander: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26], Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], 184, 185
Sigune: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26], Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26], Braunagel 1999 43 Anm. 110
Soziologie: Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26]
Sprache: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], 118 [177,27-178,26], Dewald 1975 97 Anm. 14 [177,29-177,30], 112 [177,23-178,24]
Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], 118 [177,27-178,26], Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Mergell 1943 38 Anm. 54, Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 206 [177,10-179,12], Pastré 1978 80 [177,9-179,6]
Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 97 Anm. 14 [177,29-177,30], 112 [177,23-178,24]
Syntax: Horacek 1954b 142
Titurel: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26], Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], 184, 185, Braunagel 1999 43 Anm. 110
Tod: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26], Öhlinger 2001 51 Anm. 16 [177,29-178,3]
Traummotivik: Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 183 [177,27-178,5]
Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3]
triuwe: Schmid, E. 1976 88 [177,4-178,26]
Überlieferung: Hofstätter 1951 76, 82, Engels 1970 40 Anm. 31, Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 134 [177,8-178,6]
übersetzter Abschnitt: Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26]
Übersetzung: Mohr 1979q 465, Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 550 [177,30-178,1], [177,27-178,26], 554 [177,30-178,5]
Übersetzungsproblematik: Mohr 1979q 465
Verskunst: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], 118 [177,27-178,26], Lomnitzer 1972 114 Anm. 25, Mohr 1979q 465
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 38 [177,27-178,2], Mohr 1979q 465, Sutter 2003 81 Anm. 314. Zitiert als 177,29, 86 [177,27-178,16], 203 [177,25-178,26], 249 zitiert als 177,29
elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3]
Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12], Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Pastré 1993c 206 [177,27-178,26]
Wittenwiler, Heinrich: Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26]
Wortschatz: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Schultheiß 1937 38 [177,27-178,2], Mersmann 1971 203 [177,30-178,1], Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26], Mohr 1979d 50 [177,30-178,3]
Zeitverhältnisse: Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Sutter 2003 81 Anm. 314. Zitiert als 177,29, 86 [177,27-178,16], 203 [177,25-178,26], 249 zitiert als 177,29
 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)