178, 1 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Rachbauer 1934 60 [177,11-178,26], Mohr 1958a 212 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Rachbauer 1970 60 [177,11-178,26], Pastré 1978 80 [177,9-179,6], Mohr 1979b 12 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Pastré 1979 366 [177,9-179,6], Rachbauer 1980 60 [177,11-178,26], Pérennec 1984f 204 [177,27-178,5], Wolf, A. 1985a 35 [175,8-179,12], 41 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Wolf, A. 1999h 298 [175,8-179,12], 304 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3] Architektur: Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26] Artusepik: Pérennec 1984f 204 [177,27-178,5], Schirok 1988b 12 [177,27-178,7], Roßnagel 1996 159 [177,27-178,3], Ringeler 2000 133 [177,27-178,3] Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 550 [177,30-178,1], [177,27-178,26], 554 [177,30-178,5] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26] Buch III: Yeandle 1984 64 Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3], Ortmann 1972 33 [177,13-178,26], Ringeler 2000 133 [177,27-178,3], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3], Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Wells, D. 1994 325 [177,15-178,25] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Matz 1907 71, Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], 118 [177,27-178,26], Sutter 2003 86 [177,27-178,16], 203 [177,25-178,26] Erzähler: Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3] Erzähltechnik: Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Ortmann 1972 33 [177,13-178,26], Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24], Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12], Schmid, E. 1976 88 [177,4-178,26], Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Green 1982b 9 [177,30-178,3], 68 [177,30-178,3], 73 Anm. 52 [177,30-178,1], 73 [177,29-178,3], 84 [177,27-178,3], Lieb 2002b 123 [177,14-179,6], Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 234 Anm. 48 [177,27-178,3], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3] Forschungsbericht: Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3] Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 146 [177,13-178,26], 161 Anm. 4 [177,13-178,26] Frauenfiguren: Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3] das Fremde: Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26] Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3] Gattung: Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 234 Anm. 48 [177,27-178,3], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26] Gawan: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3] Gawan-Handlung: Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3] Gebärde u. Geste: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26] Gefühle: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 236 [177,9-178,26] Geschichte: Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 183 [177,27-178,5], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30] Gottfried von Straßburg: Schirok 2004b 27 [177,29-178,3] Gral: Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26], Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24] Hartmann von Aue: Schirok 2004b 27 [177,29-178,3] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26] Hilfe u. Rat: Mohr 1954a 186 [177,30-178,3], Mohr 1979d 50 [177,30-178,3] höfischer Roman: Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3], Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 234 Anm. 48 [177,27-178,3], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26] höfisches Leben: Mersmann 1971 121 Anm. 27, 203 [177,30-178,1] Individualität: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 206 [177,27-178,26] Interpretation: Bauer, G. 1963 67 [176,28-179,12], Mohr 1965b 186 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Mersmann 1971 121 Anm. 27, 203 [177,30-178,1], Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 183 [177,27-178,5], Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26], Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26], Mohr 1979h 150 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Green 1982b 9 [177,30-178,3], 68 [177,30-178,3], 73 Anm. 52 [177,30-178,1], 73 [177,29-178,3], 84 [177,27-178,3], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], Pérennec 1984f 204 [177,27-178,5], Schirok 1988b 12 [177,27-178,7], Czerwinski 1989 124 [177,27-178,26], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 109 [175,7-179,12], Roßnagel 1996 159 [177,27-178,3] Intertextualität: Schirok 1988b 12 [177,27-178,7], Draesner 1993 236 s. auch Anm. 90 [177,27-178,5], 237 Anm. 91 [178,1-178,2], 247 [177,27-178,26], 422 [177,27-178,3] Ironie: Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3] Ither: Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 183 [177,27-178,5] Jüngerer Titurel: Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], Lorenz, A. 2002 206 [177,14-178,26] Kommentar: Yeandle 1984 64, Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 550 [177,30-178,1], [177,27-178,26], 554 [177,30-178,5], Backes, S. 1999 157 [177,28-178,3], Gilmour 2000 77 [177,27-178,10], 261 [177,9-178,26], 272 [177,27-178,26], 309 [177,27-178,26], 309-10 [177,27-178,3], 311-12, 317 Kommentarmethodik: Carey 2003 301 [177,14-179,12] Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 262 [177,25-178,26], Lasch und Liebig 2002 77 Anm. 26 [177,14-178,26], Lieb 2002b 123 [177,14-179,6] Kyot: Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 909 [177,27-178,13], Johnson, L. 1999 344 [177,12-178,26], Bertau 1972/73 909 [177,27-178,13] Männerfiguren: Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3] Minne u. Ehe: Bauer, G. 1963 67 [176,28-179,12], Schumacher, Marlis 1967 80 Anm. 11 [177,29-178,3], Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24], Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3], Schnell, Rüdiger 1985a 131 [177,29-178,3], Kleber, J. 1992b 249 [177,14-178,5], Riemer, W. und Egert 1992 71 [177,27-178,3], Spiewok 1994b 156 [177,27-178,26], Spiewok 1995b 300 [177,27-178,26], Öhlinger 2001 51 Anm. 16 [177,29-178,3], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3] Namen: Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], Rosumek 1989 194 [177,27-178,3], Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26] Parodie: Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26] Parzival: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3] Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 251 Anm. 76 [177,30-178,3] Psychologie: Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26] Quellen - allgemein: Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26], Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], Wells, D. 1994 325 [177,15-178,25] Quellen - Chrétien: Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Rachbauer 1934 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1970 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1980 60 [177,11-178,26], Sutter 2003 86 [177,27-178,16], 203 [177,25-178,26] Raum u. Bewegung: Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26] Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Matz 1907 71 Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Mersmann 1971 121 Anm. 27, 203 [177,30-178,1] Reim: Matz 1907 71 Religion: Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3] Rezeption (allgemein): Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Kölbing 1869 151 [177,9-179,12], Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26], Kern, Peter 1981 251 Anm. 76 [177,30-178,3], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30], Schirok 1988b 12 [177,27-178,7], Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26], Roßnagel 1996 159 [177,27-178,3], Lorenz, A. 2002 206 [177,14-178,26], Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 134 [176,30-178,30], 196 [177,27-178,26] Rhetorik: Pastré 1979 366 [177,9-179,6], Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26] Ritterethik: Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3], 286 [177,30-178,3] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26] Rittertum: Green 1978a 51 [177,27-178,5], Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3] Schionatulander: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26], Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30] Sigune: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26], Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26] Soziologie: Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26] Sprache: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], 118 [177,27-178,26], Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24] Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], 118 [177,27-178,26], Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 206 [177,10-179,12], Pastré 1978 80 [177,9-179,6] Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24] Titurel: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26], Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30], 100 [177,1-178,30] Tod: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26], Öhlinger 2001 51 Anm. 16 [177,29-178,3] Traummotivik: Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 183 [177,27-178,5] Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3] triuwe: Schmid, E. 1976 88 [177,4-178,26] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 134 [177,8-178,6] übersetzter Abschnitt: Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26] Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 550 [177,30-178,1], [177,27-178,26], 554 [177,30-178,5] Verskunst: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], 118 [177,27-178,26] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 38 [177,27-178,2], Sutter 2003 86 [177,27-178,16], 203 [177,25-178,26] elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12], Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Pastré 1993c 206 [177,27-178,26] Wittenwiler, Heinrich: Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26] Wortschatz: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Schultheiß 1937 38 [177,27-178,2], Mersmann 1971 121 Anm. 27, 203 [177,30-178,1], Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26], Mohr 1979d 50 [177,30-178,3] Zeitverhältnisse: Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Sutter 2003 86 [177,27-178,16], 203 [177,25-178,26]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)