178, 3 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 178, 2]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 38 Anm. 54 [178,2-178,3], Mohr 1958a 212 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Mohr 1979b 12 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Pastré 1979 366 [177,9-179,6], Wolf, A. 1985a 35 [175,8-179,12], 41 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Wolf, A. 1999h 298 [175,8-179,12], 304 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Gilmour 2000 309 [177,27-178,26] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 221 [177,30-178,3], Ortmann 1972 33 [177,13-178,26], Ringeler 2000 133 [177,27-178,3] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Wells, D. 1994 325 [177,15-178,25] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], Nellmann 1994c 550 [177,27-178,26] Erzähltechnik: Schmid, E. 1976 88 [177,4-178,26], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Green 1982b 9 [177,30-178,3], 68 [177,30-178,3], 72 Anm. 46, 73 [177,29-178,3], 84 [177,27-178,3], Gilmour 2000 309-10 [177,27-178,3], Lieb 2002b 123 [177,14-179,6], Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 234 Anm. 48 [177,27-178,3], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26] Etymologie: Eichholz 1987 49 Anm. 1 Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 146 [177,13-178,26], 161 Anm. 4 [177,13-178,26] Gebärde u. Geste: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26] Handschriftliches: Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12], Gilmour 2000 313 Hartmann von Aue: Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26], Draesner 1993 247 [177,27-178,26], Nellmann 1994c 550 [177,27-178,26], Roßnagel 1996 159 [177,27-178,3], Gilmour 2000 309 [177,27-178,26], Schirok 2004b 27 [177,29-178,3] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26] Hilfe u. Rat: Mohr 1954a 186 [177,30-178,3], Mohr 1979d 50 [177,30-178,3] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 206 [177,27-178,26] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 909 [177,27-178,13], Bauer, G. 1963 67 [176,28-179,12], Mohr 1965b 186 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 183 [177,27-178,5], Kratz, H. 1973a 236 [177,9-178,26], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26], Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26], Spiewok 1977 597, Mohr 1979h 150 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Pérennec 1984f 204 [177,27-178,5], 444 Anm. 49 [178,2-178,3], Spiewok 1986c 609, Czerwinski 1989 124 [177,27-178,26], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 109 [175,7-179,12], Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 552, 554 [177,30-178,5], Backes, S. 1999 156 [178,2-178,3], 157 [177,28-178,3], Gilmour 2000 77 [177,27-178,10], 261 [177,9-178,26], 272 [177,27-178,26], 309 [177,27-178,26], 309-10 [177,27-178,3], 313, Carey 2003 301 [177,14-179,12] Intertextualität: Schirok 1988b 12 [177,27-178,7], Draesner 1993 236 s. auch Anm. 90 [177,27-178,5], 247 [177,27-178,26], 422 [177,27-178,3] Ironie: Green 1979a 63 [177,27-178,3] Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 262 [177,25-178,26], Lasch und Liebig 2002 77 Anm. 26 [177,14-178,26] Kyot: Lowet 1955 46 [177,27-178,3] Minne u. Ehe: Schumacher, Marlis 1967 80 Anm. 11 [177,29-178,3], Schnell, Rüdiger 1985a 131 [177,29-178,3], Kleber, J. 1992b 249 [177,14-178,5], Riemer, W. und Egert 1992 71 [177,27-178,3], Spiewok 1994b 156 [177,27-178,26], Spiewok 1995b 300 [177,27-178,26], Öhlinger 2001 51 Anm. 16 [177,29-178,3], Emmerling 2003 283 [177,30-178,3] Namen: Fourquet 1949 247, Nitze und Williams, H. 1955 265, Rosenfeld, Hellmut 1971 206, Rosenfeld, Hellmut 1974 42, 43, Fourquet 1979l 192, Mohr 1979q 464, 483, Schröder, Werner 1982b 22, 68, Rosumek 1989 192, 194 [177,27-178,3], Chandler 1992 159 [178,2-178,3], 160 [178,2-178,3], Gilmour 2000 313, Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 106, Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Brown, A. 1943 179 [178,2-178,5], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26], Rachbauer 1934 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1970 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1980 60 [177,11-178,26] Reim: Gilmour 2000 310 Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Kölbing 1869 151 [177,9-179,12], Nyholm 1964 366, Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26], Kern, Peter 1981 251 Anm. 76 [177,30-178,3], Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26], Lorenz, A. 2002 206 [177,14-178,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Spreckelsen u.a. 1997 623, Wagemann 1998 134 [176,30-178,30], 196 [177,27-178,26] Ritterethik: Emmerling 2003 286 [177,30-178,3] Rittertum: Green 1978a 51 [177,27-178,5] Schionatulander: Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26], Passage 1984 100 [177,1-178,30] Sigune: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26] Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 118 [177,27-178,26], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 206 [177,10-179,12], Pastré 1978 80 [177,9-179,6] Tod: Johnson, L. 1999 344 [177,12-178,26] Überlieferung: Hofstätter 1951 76, Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 134 [177,8-178,6] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Nellmann 1994c 550, Sutter 2003 86 [177,27-178,16], 108 Anm. 393, 203 [177,25-178,26], 248, 256 Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12] Wortschatz: Büchel 1925 13 [178,2-178,5] Wortsinn: Gilmour 2000 313
	[Zu 178, 4]