178,13 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 178,12]
Adaptation: Mohr 1958a 212 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Mohr 1979b 12 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Pastré 1979 366 [177,9-179,6], Pérennec 1985b 113 [178,11-178,25], Wolf, A. 1985a 35 [175,8-179,12], 41 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Pérennec 1993 235 [178,11-178,26], Wolf, A. 1999h 298 [175,8-179,12], 304 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Gilmour 2000 309 [177,27-178,26] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 33 [177,13-178,26] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Wells, D. 1994 325 [177,15-178,25] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Grimm, Walther Ludwig 1897 51 Anm. 94 [178,11-178,13], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], Nellmann 1994c 550 [177,27-178,26] Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 51 [178,11-178,13], Schmid, E. 1976 88 [177,4-178,26], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Groos 1993a 273 [178,11-178,26], Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26], Groos 2002 134 [178,11-178,26], Lieb 2002b 123 [177,14-179,6], Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26] Fiktionalität: Green 2002a 35 Anm. 22 [178,11-178,23], Green 2002b 216 Anm. 41 [178,11-178,14] Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 146 [177,13-178,26], 161 Anm. 4 [177,13-178,26] Gebärde u. Geste: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 155 [178,12-178,14] Handschriftliches: Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12] Hartmann von Aue: Grimm, Walther Ludwig 1897 51 Anm. 94 [178,11-178,13], Ehrismann, G. 1927 220 [178,11-178,13], Schnell, Rüdiger 1973 312 [178,11-178,23], Yeandle 1984 361 [178,12-178,26], Pérennec 1985b 113 [178,11-178,25], Wand 1989 30 [178,11-178,26], 56 [178,11-178,26], 169 [178,11-178,14], 174 [178,11-178,14], Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26], Draesner 1993 237 [178,11-178,26], 241 s. auch Anm. 102 [178,11-178,14], 247 [177,27-178,26], Wailes 1993 304 [178,11-178,23], Nellmann 1994c 550 [178,12-178,13], [177,27-178,26], Roßnagel 1996 159, Gilmour 2000 309 [177,27-178,26], 318-19 [178,11-178,26], 319-20 [178,11-178,14], Schirok 2004b 27 [178,11-178,14] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 206 [177,27-178,26] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 909 [177,27-178,13], Bauer, G. 1963 67 [176,28-179,12], Mohr 1965b 186 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 186 [178,11-178,13], Kratz, H. 1973a 236 [177,9-178,26], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26], Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26], Mohr 1979h 150 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Brall 1983b 230 [178,12-178,13], Pérennec 1984f 206 [178,11-178,13], Yeandle 1984 377 [178,11-178,13], Schirok 1988c 443 [178,11-178,14], Czerwinski 1989 124 [177,27-178,26], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 109 [175,7-179,12], Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 661 [178,11-178,14], Groos 1995 117 [178,11-178,26], Gilmour 2000 77 [178,11-178,26], 261 [177,9-178,26], 265 Anm. 171, 272 [177,27-178,26], 309 [177,27-178,26], 318-19 [178,11-178,26], 319-20 [178,11-178,14], 321-22, Carey 2003 301 [177,14-179,12] Interpretation - Strukturalismus: Simon, R. 1990 67 [178,11-178,26] Intertextualität: Draesner 1993 210 Anm. 39 [178,11-178,13], 237 [178,11-178,26], 241 s. auch Anm. 102 [178,11-178,14], 247 [177,27-178,26], Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26] Intratextualität: Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26] Ironie: Green 1979a 64 [178,11-178,13] Jagd u. Vogelfang: Dalby 1965 210 [178,11-178,14], 213 [178,11-178,14], Gilmour 2000 321-22 Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 262 [177,25-178,26], Lasch und Liebig 2002 77 Anm. 26 [177,14-178,26] Minne u. Ehe: Riemer, W. und Egert 1992 71 [178,11-178,13], Spiewok 1994b 156 [177,27-178,26], Spiewok 1995b 300 [177,27-178,26], Emmerling 2003 283 [178,11-178,13] Namen: Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26] Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Passage 1984 96 [177,1-178,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 26 [178,11-178,24], Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26], Rachbauer 1934 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1970 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1980 60 [177,11-178,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Kölbing 1869 151 [177,9-179,12], Cormeau 1977a 202 [178,11-178,23], Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26], Kern, Peter 1981 96 Anm. 18 [178,11-178,26], Schirok 1982 26 [178,11-178,26], Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26], Wailes 1993 304 [178,11-178,23], Lorenz, A. 2002 39 Anm. 75 [178,12-178,13], 206 [177,14-178,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 134 [176,30-178,30], 196 [177,27-178,26] Rittertum: Green 1978a 52, 57 Anm. 2 [178,11-178,14] Schionatulander: Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26], Passage 1984 100 [177,1-178,30] Sigune: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26] Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 118 [177,27-178,26], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 206 [177,10-179,12], Pastré 1978 80 [177,9-179,6] Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Lewis 1974 98 [178,12-178,13], Schnell, Rüdiger 1974 267 Anm. 70, Gilmour 2000 38 [178,11-178,13], 39 Tod: Johnson, L. 1999 344 [177,12-178,26] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 134 [178,8-179,7] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26], Sutter 2003 86 [177,27-178,16], 86 Anm. 333 [178,9-178,26], 203 [177,25-178,26], 258 [178,9-178,15] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12] Zeitverhältnisse: Draesner 1993 241 s. auch Anm. 102 [178,11-178,14]
	[Zu 178,14]