178,21 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 178,20]
Adaptation: Mohr 1958a 212 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Mohr 1979b 12 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Pastré 1979 366 [177,9-179,6], Pérennec 1985b 113 [178,11-178,25], Wolf, A. 1985a 35 [175,8-179,12], 41 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Pérennec 1993 235 [178,11-178,26], Wolf, A. 1999h 298 [175,8-179,12], 304 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Gilmour 2000 309 [177,27-178,26] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24] Chaostheorie: Grein Gamra 1999 96 [178,15-178,26] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 33 [177,13-178,26] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Wells, D. 1994 325 [177,15-178,25] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], Nellmann 1994c 550 [177,27-178,26] Erzähltechnik: Schmid, E. 1976 88 [177,4-178,26], Green 1980b 86 [178,15-178,23], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Groos 1993a 273 [178,11-178,26], Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26], Groos 2002 134 [178,11-178,26], Lieb 2002b 123 [177,14-179,6], Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 234 Anm. 48 [178,15-178,26], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26] Fiktionalität: Green 2002a 35 Anm. 22 [178,11-178,23], 37 [178,20-178,23], Green 2002b 64 [178,20-178,26] französischer Wortschatz: Wiener 1895 340, Suolahti 1933 325 Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 146 [177,13-178,26], 161 Anm. 4 [177,13-178,26] Frauenfiguren: Gibbs 1972 227 [178,16-178,24] Gebärde u. Geste: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26] Handschriftliches: Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12], Gilmour 2000 324-25 Hartmann von Aue: Ehrismann, G. 1927 220 [178,20-178,23], Zeydel und Morgan 1951 363, Schnell, Rüdiger 1973 312 [178,11-178,23], Spiewok 1977 597, Yeandle 1984 361 [178,12-178,26], Pérennec 1985b 113 [178,11-178,25], Spiewok 1986c 609, Wand 1989 30 [178,11-178,26], 56 [178,11-178,26], 110, 169 [178,20-178,26], 174 [178,20-178,26], 209 Anm. 2 [178,15-178,23], Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26], Draesner 1993 237 [178,11-178,26], 247 [177,27-178,26], Wailes 1993 304 [178,11-178,23], Nellmann 1994c 550 [178,20-178,23], [177,27-178,26], 554 [178,20-178,23], 565 [178,15-178,23], 724 [178,20-178,23], Roßnagel 1996 159 [178,15-178,23], Backes, S. 1999 157 [178,15-178,26], Gilmour 2000 309 [177,27-178,26], 318-19 [178,11-178,26], 321 [178,15-178,26], 322 [178,15-178,26], 324-25, Schirok 2004b 27 [178,15-178,26] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26] Herzeloyde: Eder, Annemarie 1989 210 [178,15-178,26] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Bayer, Hans 1980 75 [178,15-178,26] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 206 [177,27-178,26] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 909 [178,15-178,26], Bauer, G. 1963 67 [176,28-179,12], Mohr 1965b 186 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 187 [178,20-178,23], Kratz, H. 1973a 236 [177,9-178,26], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26], Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26], Schweikle, G. 1977 197, Mohr 1979h 150 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Huber, H. 1981 244 Anm. 73 [178,15-178,25], Brall 1983b 230 [178,21-178,23], Pérennec 1984f 206 [178,20-178,26], Wynn 1984 318 Anm. 17 [178,15-178,26], Spiewok 1986c 609, Schirok 1988c 443 [178,20-178,23], Czerwinski 1989 124 [177,27-178,26], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 109 [175,7-179,12], Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 551, 656 [178,15-178,26], Groos 1995 117 [178,11-178,26], Backes, S. 1999 157 [178,15-178,26], Garnerus 1999 126 [178,15-178,26], Drecoll 2000 285 Anm. 25 [178,15-178,22], Gilmour 2000 77 [178,11-178,26], 261 [177,9-178,26], 272 [177,27-178,26], 309 [177,27-178,26], 318-19 [178,11-178,26], 322 [178,15-178,26], 324-25, Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2002 232 [178,15-178,26], Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2003 171 [178,15-178,23], Carey 2003 301 [177,14-179,12] Interpretation - Strukturalismus: Simon, R. 1990 67 [178,11-178,26] Intertextualität: Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 635 Anm. 74 [178,20-178,26], 637 Anm. 84 [178,15-178,23], Spiewok 1986c 609, Draesner 1993 237 [178,11-178,26], 247 [177,27-178,26], Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26] Intratextualität: Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26] Ironie: Green 1979a 65 [178,20-178,23] Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 262 [177,25-178,26], Lasch und Liebig 2002 77 Anm. 26 [177,14-178,26] Minne u. Ehe: Schumacher, Marlis 1967 80 Anm. 11 [178,15-178,26], Riemer, W. und Egert 1992 71 [178,15-178,26], Karg, I. 1993b 39 [178,15-178,26], Spiewok 1994b 156 [177,27-178,26], Spiewok 1995b 300 [177,27-178,26], Emmerling 2003 283 [178,20-178,23], Sager 2003a 277 Anm. 26 [178,15-178,24] Namen: Mohr 1979q 480, Schröder, Werner 1982b 110, Passage 1984 176 [178,15-178,25], 185 [178,15-178,26], 194 [178,21-178,23], Backes, S. 1999 157 [178,15-178,26], Braunagel 1999 43 Anm. 111, Gilmour 2000 320, 324-25, Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26] Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Passage 1984 80 [178,15-178,26], 96 [177,1-178,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 26 [178,11-178,24], Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26], Rachbauer 1934 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1970 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1980 60 [177,11-178,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Kölbing 1869 151 [177,9-179,12], Cormeau 1977a 202 [178,11-178,23], Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26], Kern, Peter 1981 96 Anm. 18 [178,11-178,26], 109 Anm. 50 [178,20-178,23], Schirok 1982 24 [178,15-178,26], 26 [178,11-178,26], Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26], Wailes 1993 304 [178,11-178,23], Lorenz, A. 2002 39 Anm. 75 [178,21-178,23], 167 [178,20-178,23], 206 [177,14-178,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 134 [176,30-178,30], 196 [177,27-178,26] Rittertum: Green 1978a 52 [178,20-178,23] Schionatulander: Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26], Passage 1984 100 [177,1-178,30] Sigune: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26] Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 118 [177,27-178,26], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 206 [177,10-179,12], Pastré 1978 80 [177,9-179,6] Syntax: Horacek 1964 219 [178,15-178,26], Kashiwagi 1970 12 Anm. 2 [178,20-178,22], Gilmour 2000 324-25 Titurel: Ehrismann, G. 1927 290 [178,15-178,24] Tod: Johnson, L. 1999 344 [177,12-178,26] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 134 [178,8-179,7] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26], Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2002 251 [178,15-178,26], Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2003 179 [178,15-178,23], Sutter 2003 86 Anm. 333 [178,9-178,26], 203 [177,25-178,26] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12] Wortsinn: Gilmour 2000 324-25
	[Zu 178,22]