178,24 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 178,23]
Adaptation: Mohr 1958a 212 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Mohr 1979b 12 Anm. 1 [177,23-178,26], Pastré 1979 366 [177,9-179,6], Pérennec 1985b 113 [178,11-178,25], Wolf, A. 1985a 35 [175,8-179,12], 41 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Pérennec 1993 235 [178,11-178,26], Wolf, A. 1999h 298 [175,8-179,12], 304 s. auch Anm. 55. [177,14-178,26], Gilmour 2000 309 [177,27-178,26] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 112 [177,23-178,24] Chaostheorie: Grein Gamra 1999 96 [178,15-178,26] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 33 [177,13-178,26] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Wells, D. 1994 325 [177,15-178,25] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [177,27-178,26], 60 Anm. 1 [177,27-178,26], 75 [177,27-178,26], Nellmann 1994c 550 [177,27-178,26] Erzähltechnik: Schmid, E. 1976 88 [177,4-178,26], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 2 [177,14-178,26], Groos 1993a 273 [178,11-178,26], Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26], Groos 2002 134 [178,11-178,26], Lieb 2002b 123 [177,14-179,6], Schu 2002 95 Anm. 180 [177,27-178,26], 234 Anm. 48 [178,15-178,26], 371 Anm. 138 [177,27-178,30], 377 [177,13-178,26], 387 Anm. 187 [178,24-178,25] Farben u. Farbensymbolik: Jacobsohn 1915 40, Brinker-von der Heyde 1996b 87 Anm. 158 Fiktionalität: Green 2002b 64 [178,20-178,26] Frauen (allgemein): Brackert 1989 146 [177,13-178,26], 161 Anm. 4 [177,13-178,26] Frauenfiguren: Gibbs 1972 227 [178,16-178,24], Greenfield 2002b 167 [178,24-178,26] Gebärde u. Geste: Leicher 1927 114 [177,14-178,26], Leicher 1977 114 [177,14-178,26] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 155, 156-57 [178,22-178,24], Gilmour 2000 325-26 Handschriftliches: Heinzle 1972 73, Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12] Hartmann von Aue: Yeandle 1984 361 [178,12-178,26], Pérennec 1985b 113 [178,11-178,25], Wand 1989 30 [178,11-178,26], 31 [178,24-178,26], 56 [178,11-178,26], 169 [178,20-178,26], 174 [178,20-178,26], 218 Anm. 83 [178,24-178,28], Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26], Draesner 1993 237 [178,11-178,26], 247 [177,27-178,26], Nellmann 1994c 550 [177,27-178,26], Backes, S. 1999 157 [178,15-178,26], Gilmour 2000 309 [177,27-178,26], 318-19 [178,11-178,26], 321 [178,15-178,26], 322 [178,15-178,26], Schirok 2004b 27 [178,15-178,26] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 195 [177,14-178,26] Herzeloyde: Eder, Annemarie 1989 210 [178,15-178,26] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Bayer, Hans 1980 75 [178,15-178,26] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 206 [177,27-178,26] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 909 [178,15-178,26], Bauer, G. 1963 67 [176,28-179,12], Mohr 1965b 186 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Zutt 1968 183 [177,27-178,26], Roßkopf 1972 182 [177,27-178,26], 188 [178,24-178,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 236 [177,9-178,26], Welz 1976 84 [177,14-178,26], Wiesinger 1976a 254 [177,27-178,26], Mohr 1979h 150 Anm. 5 [177,13-178,26], Huber, H. 1981 58 [178,23-178,24], 81, 142 [178,23-178,24], 244 Anm. 73 [178,15-178,25], Pérennec 1984f 206 [178,20-178,26], Wynn 1984 318 Anm. 17 [178,15-178,26], Yeandle 1984 326, Czerwinski 1989 124 [177,27-178,26], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 109 [175,7-179,12], Nellmann 1994c 455 [177,14-178,26], 656 [178,15-178,26], Groos 1995 117 [178,11-178,26], Brinker-von der Heyde 1996b 265 [178,24-178,26], Backes, S. 1999 157 [178,15-178,26], Garnerus 1999 126 [178,15-178,26], Gilmour 2000 77 [178,11-178,26], 261 [177,9-178,26], 264 Anm. 162 [178,24-178,25], 272 [177,27-178,26], 309 [177,27-178,26], 318-19 [178,11-178,26], 322 [178,15-178,26], 325 [178,24-178,25], 325-26, Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2002 232 [178,15-178,26], Carey 2003 301 [177,14-179,12] Interpretation - Strukturalismus: Simon, R. 1990 67 [178,11-178,26] Intertextualität: Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 635 Anm. 74 [178,20-178,26], Draesner 1993 237 [178,11-178,26], 247 [177,27-178,26], 254 Anm. 124, Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26] Intratextualität: Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26] Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 262 [177,25-178,26], Lasch und Liebig 2002 77 Anm. 26 [177,14-178,26] Lichtmetaphorik: Gilmour 2000 325-26 Minne u. Ehe: Wilmanns 1916 493 Anm. 315, Schumacher, Marlis 1967 80 Anm. 11 [178,15-178,26], 131, Riemer, W. und Egert 1992 71, [178,15-178,26], Karg, I. 1993b 39 [178,15-178,26], Spiewok 1994b 156 [177,27-178,26], Spiewok 1995b 300 [177,27-178,26], Ernst 1998 229 [178,22-178,26], Fritsch-Rößler 1999 234, Drecoll 2000 138, 139 Anm. 101, Sager 2003a 277 Anm. 26 [178,15-178,24] Namen: Heinzle 1972 73, Passage 1984 176 [178,15-178,25], 185 [178,15-178,26], 186, Backes, S. 1999 157 [178,15-178,26], Müller, M. 2003 208 [177,27-178,26] Philologie: Yeandle 1984 157 Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 28 [177,13-179,12], Passage 1984 80 [178,15-178,26], 96 [177,1-178,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 26 [178,11-178,24], Golther 1925a 153 [177,23-178,26], Rachbauer 1934 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1970 60 [177,11-178,26], Rachbauer 1980 60 [177,11-178,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Kölbing 1869 151 [177,9-179,12], Belitz 1978 114 [177,27-178,26], Kern, Peter 1981 96 Anm. 18 [178,11-178,26], Schirok 1982 20 [178,24-178,25], 24 [178,15-178,26], 26 [178,11-178,26], Bastert 1993 229 [178,1-178,26], Lorenz, A. 2002 206 [177,14-178,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 134 [176,30-178,30], 196 [177,27-178,26] Richtungskonstruktionen: Wießner 1901 462 [178,24-178,25] Schionatulander: Richey 1960 42 [177,27-178,26], Passage 1984 100 [177,1-178,30] Schönheit: Gilmour 2000 325-26 Sigune: Richey 1927 43 [177,27-178,26] Sprache: Barufke 1995 150 Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 118 [177,27-178,26], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 206 [177,10-179,12], Pastré 1978 80 [177,9-179,6] Syntax: Horacek 1964 219 [178,15-178,26] Titurel: Ehrismann, G. 1927 290 [178,15-178,24] Tod: Johnson, L. 1999 344 [177,12-178,26] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 134 [178,8-179,7] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Gilmour 2000 318-19 [178,11-178,26], Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2002 251 [178,15-178,26], Sutter 2003 86, 86 Anm. 333 [178,9-178,26], 203 [177,25-178,26] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 63 [177,9-179,12] Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 34, Mersmann 1971 250
	[Zu 178,25]