186, 3 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 103 [186,2-186,3] Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,1-186,6], 63 [186,2-186,3], Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30], Rachbauer 1934 93 [186,1-186,6], Mergell 1943 15 Anm. 4 [186,1-186,5], Rachbauer 1970 93 [186,1-186,6], Rachbauer 1980 93 [186,1-186,6], Lofmark 1981 104 [186,1-186,20] Apokoinu: Gärtner 1969 245 [186,2-186,3] Artusepik: Ringeler 2000 132 [185,27-186,12], 143 Anm. 104 [185,30-186,6] Ausgabe: Heinzle 1991a 958 [186,2-186,3], Nellmann 1994c 555 [186,2-186,3], 569 [186,1-186,10] Blutstropfenepisode: Lofmark 1977b 991 [186,2-186,5] Buch III: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20], Yeandle 1984 55 [186,1-186,5] Buch IV: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] Buch V: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] Buch VI: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] Charakterisierung: Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [186,1-186,6], Huber, H. 1981 187 [186,1-186,6], 278 Anm. 261 [186,1-186,5], Ringeler 2000 132 [185,27-186,12], 143 Anm. 104 [185,30-186,6] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Hennig, U. 1975 324 [186,1-186,5], Green 1982a 55 [186,1-186,5], 81 Anm. 123 [186,1-186,6] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Matz 1907 14 [186,2-186,3] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 15 Anm. 4 [186,1-186,5], Lofmark 1977b 991 [186,2-186,5], Lofmark 1981 104 [186,1-186,20], Green 1982b 208 Anm. 114 [185,30-186,10], Jäger, D. 1998 30 [185,21-187,6], Urscheler 2002 209 [186,1-186,3] Erziehung: Cosman 1966 95 [186,1-186,5], Hennig, U. 1975 324 [186,1-186,5] Farben u. Farbensymbolik: Jacobsohn 1915 11 [186,2-186,5], 142 [186,1-186,5] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Fragen: Hennig, U. 1975 324 [186,1-186,5] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Russ 2000 66 [186,2-186,3] Gebärde u. Geste: Peil 1975 41 Anm. 37 [186,2-186,3], 307 [186,2-186,3] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 96 [186,2-186,5], 240 [185,19-187,6] Gral: Lofmark 1977b 991 [186,2-186,5] Grammatik: Gärtner 1969 245 [186,2-186,3] Handschriftliches: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 103 [186,2-186,3] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 327 [186,1-186,30], [186,1-186,30] höfisches Leben: Naumann, H. 1929a 14 [186,2-186,5], Mersmann 1971 129 Anm. 23 [185,27-186,6], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Neuendorff 1987b 55 [185,27-186,10] Interpretation: Mersmann 1971 129 Anm. 23 [185,27-186,6], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Hahn, I. 1975 226 [186,1-186,5], Lofmark 1977b 991 [186,2-186,5], Mohr 1979l 231 [186,2-186,6], Huber, H. 1981 187 [186,1-186,6], 278 Anm. 261 [186,1-186,5], Green 1982a 55 [186,1-186,5], 81 Anm. 123 [186,1-186,6], Green 1982b 208 Anm. 114 [185,30-186,10], Smits 1996 28 [186,2-186,3] Kindheit u. Jugend: Cosman 1966 95 [186,1-186,5], Russ 2000 66 [186,2-186,3] Kommentar: Yeandle 1984 55 [186,1-186,5], Heinzle 1991a 958 [186,2-186,3], Nellmann 1994c 555 [186,2-186,3], 569 [186,1-186,10], Kordt 1997 42 [186,1-186,5], Backes, S. 1999 54 [186,1-186,5], Gilmour 2000 47 [185,27-186,10], 102 [186,2-186,3], 107-08 [186,2-186,6], 197 [185,30-186,6], 198 [186,2-186,3], 200, [186,1-186,6] Kommunikation: Urscheler 2002 209 [186,1-186,3] Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,1-186,6], 63 [186,2-186,3], Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30] Lichtmetaphorik: Hahn, I. 1975 226 [186,1-186,5], Huber, H. 1981 187 [186,1-186,6], 278 Anm. 261 [186,1-186,5], Lemke 1981 84 [185,30-186,5], James-Raoul 1998 228 [186,1-186,6], Cessari 2000 76 [185,30-186,6] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Mohr 1979l 231 [186,2-186,6], Lemke 1981 84 [185,30-186,5], James-Raoul 1998 228 [186,1-186,6] Minne u. Ehe: Naumann, H. 1929a 14 [186,2-186,5], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Lofmark 1977b 991 [186,2-186,5] Naturwissenschaft: Lemke 1981 84 [185,30-186,5], James-Raoul 1998 228 [186,1-186,6] Philologie: Smits 1996 28 [186,2-186,3] Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 176 Anm. 45 [185,27-186,10], 201 Anm. 177 [186,1-186,10] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,1-186,6], 63 [186,2-186,3], Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30], Lofmark 1981 104 [186,1-186,20] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,1-186,6], 63 [186,2-186,3], Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30], Rachbauer 1934 93 [186,1-186,6], Rachbauer 1970 93 [186,1-186,6], Rachbauer 1980 93 [186,1-186,6] Raum u. Bewegung: Jäger, D. 1998 30 [185,21-187,6] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Jäger, D. 1998 30 [185,21-187,6] Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Matz 1907 14 [186,2-186,3] Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Mersmann 1971 129 Anm. 23 [185,27-186,6] Reim: Kraus, C. 1898a 124 [186,3-186,4], Matz 1907 14 [186,2-186,3], Kraus, C. 1985 124 [186,3-186,4] Religion: Naumann, H. 1929a 14 [186,2-186,5], Cessari 2000 76 [185,30-186,6] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Cosman 1966 95 [186,1-186,5], Kern, Peter 1981 176 Anm. 45 [185,27-186,10], 201 Anm. 177 [186,1-186,10], Russ 2000 66 [186,2-186,3] Rhetorik: Lofmark 1981 104 [186,1-186,20] Ritterethik: Naumann, H. 1929a 14 [186,2-186,5], Naumann, H. 1970 104 [186,2-186,3] Schönheit: Hahn, I. 1975 226 [186,1-186,5], Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [186,1-186,6], Huber, H. 1981 187 [186,1-186,6], 278 Anm. 261 [186,1-186,5] Sexuelles u. Geschlechterbeziehungen: Smits 1996 28 [186,2-186,3] Sprache: Kraus, C. 1898a 124 [186,3-186,4], Lofmark 1977b 991 [186,2-186,5], Mohr 1979l 231 [186,2-186,6], Kraus, C. 1985 124 [186,3-186,4] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,1-186,6], 63 [186,2-186,3], Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30], Mergell 1943 15 Anm. 4 [186,1-186,5], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Wolff, L. 1967d 265 [186,2-186,5], Kutzner 1975 70 [186,1-186,5] Subjektivität: Lofmark 1977b 991 [186,2-186,5] Syntax: Gärtner 1969 245 [186,2-186,3] Überlieferung: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 103 [186,2-186,3] Übersetzung: Heinzle 1991a 958 [186,2-186,3], Nellmann 1994c 555 [186,2-186,3], 569 [186,1-186,10] elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Russ 2000 66 [186,2-186,3] Werkstruktur: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] Willehalm: Heinzle 1991a 958 [186,2-186,3] Wortschatz: Mersmann 1971 129 Anm. 23 [185,27-186,6] Wortsinn: Kraus, C. 1930b 327-28 Anm. 3 [186,2-186,5] Zahlenkomposition: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)