| 186,11 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) | |
|
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,11-186,14], Morgan 1913 182, Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30], Rachbauer 1934 93 [186,11-186,14], Mergell 1943 71 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,20], Rachbauer 1970 93 [186,11-186,14], Rachbauer 1980 93 [186,11-186,14], Lofmark 1981 104 [186,1-186,20]
Apokoinu: Karg, F. 1929a 65 [186,11-186,12] Artusepik: Ringeler 2000 132 [185,27-186,12], 136 Anm. 73 [186,7-186,14] Buch III: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] Buch IV: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] Buch V: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] Buch VI: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] Charakterisierung: Morgan 1913 182, Ringeler 2000 132 [185,27-186,12], 136 Anm. 73 [186,7-186,14] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [186,11-186,14] Erzähltechnik: Schwartzkopff 1909 27, Mergell 1943 71 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,20], Lofmark 1981 104 [186,1-186,20], Jäger, D. 1998 30 [185,21-187,6] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Frauen (allgemein): Weinhold 1882b 201 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,14], Weinhold 1968b 201 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,14] Frauenfiguren: Morgan 1913 182, Heise 1957 41 [186,11-186,20] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 240 [185,19-187,6] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 327 [186,1-186,30], [186,1-186,30] höfisches Leben: Weinhold 1882b 201 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,14], Weinhold 1968b 201 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,14], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Neuendorff 1987b 55 [186,11-186,16] Humor: Kant 1878 51 > Interpretation: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Kleidung, Mode, Textilien: Weinhold 1882b 201 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,14], Weinhold 1968b 201 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,14] Kommunikation: Schwartzkopff 1909 27 Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,11-186,14], Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30] Minne u. Ehe: Weinhold 1882b 201 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,14], Weinhold 1968b 201 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,14], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Pädagogik: Heise 1957 41 [186,11-186,20] Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 202 Anm. 179 [186,11-186,16] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,11-186,14], Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30], Lofmark 1981 104 [186,1-186,20] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,11-186,14], Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30], Rachbauer 1934 93 [186,11-186,14], Rachbauer 1970 93 [186,11-186,14], Rachbauer 1980 93 [186,11-186,14] Raum u. Bewegung: Jäger, D. 1998 30 [185,21-187,6] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Jäger, D. 1998 30 [185,21-187,6] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Kern, Peter 1981 202 Anm. 179 [186,11-186,16] Rhetorik: Lofmark 1981 104 [186,1-186,20] Sprache: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [186,11-186,14] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,11-186,14], Schwartzkopff 1909 27, Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [186,11-186,14], Weber, G. 1928 31 [186,1-186,14], [185,1-186,30], Mergell 1943 71 Anm. 5 [186,11-186,20], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Syntax: Horacek 1964 232 [186,11-186,12] Verskunst: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [186,11-186,14] Werkstruktur: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] Zahlenkomposition: Fourquet 1965 146 [185,19-186,20], Fourquet 1979j 171 [185,19-186,20] | |
| (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) |