186,24 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,24-186,27], Weber, G. 1928 31 [185,1-186,30], Rachbauer 1934 94 [186,21-186,27], Mergell 1943 70 [186,21-186,25], Rachbauer 1970 94 [186,21-186,27], Rachbauer 1980 94 [186,21-186,27], Groos 1993a 269 [186,21-186,29], Groos 2002 130 [186,21-186,29] Architektur: Wiesinger 1976a 254 [186,21-187,23] Artusepik: Ringeler 2000 133 [186,21-187,1] Ausgabe: Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 632 Anm. 58 [186,21-186,27], Nellmann 1994c 686 [186,21-186,25], 775, Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2002 193 [186,21-186,25], 195 [186,20-187,4], 203 [186,21-187,1], Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2003 154 [186,21-186,25], 159 [186,21-186,27] Bogengleichnis: Kaminski 2003 39 Anm. 65 [186,21-186,25] Charakterisierung: Ringeler 2000 133 [186,21-187,1] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 71, Schäfer, H. 1983 86 [186,17-186,25], Schäfer, H. 1985 90 [186,17-186,25], Sutter 2003 81 Anm. 313, 82 Anm. 317, 82 [186,21-186,27], 257, 265 Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 70 [186,21-186,25], Green 1982b 73 Anm. 51, Schirok 1988c 433, Groos 1993a 269 [186,21-186,29], Groos 1995 110 [186,21-186,29], Jäger, D. 1998 30 [185,21-187,6], Groos 2002 130 [186,21-186,29], Kaminski 2003 39 Anm. 65 [186,21-186,25] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Ernst 1985 182 [186,21-186,24] Gattung: Groos 1995 110 [186,21-186,29] Gebärde u. Geste: Peil 1975 41 Anm. 38, 41 [186,21-186,25], 307 Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 240 [185,19-187,6] Geschichte: Passage 1984 183 [186,21-187,1], 184 [186,17-186,27] Gral: Schäfer, H. 1983 86 [186,17-186,25], Schäfer, H. 1985 90 [186,17-186,25] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 64 heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 327 [186,1-186,30], [186,1-186,30] höfisches Leben: Mersmann 1971 234, 236, Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Interpretation: Mersmann 1971 234, 236, Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wiesinger 1976a 254 [186,21-187,23], Green 1982b 73 Anm. 51, Passage 1984 183 [186,21-187,1], 184 [186,17-186,27], Schmid, E. 1986 182, Schirok 1988c 433, Groos 1993a 269 [186,21-186,29], Groos 1995 110 [186,21-186,29], Groos 2002 130 [186,21-186,29], Kaminski 2003 39 Anm. 65 [186,21-186,25] Jüngerer Titurel: Passage 1984 183 [186,21-187,1], 184 [186,17-186,27], Lorenz, A. 2002 38 [186,21-186,27], 47 [186,21-186,27] Kommentar: Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 632 Anm. 58 [186,21-186,27], Nellmann 1994c 686 [186,21-186,25], 775, Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2002 193 [186,21-186,25], 195 [186,20-187,4], 203 [186,21-187,1], Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2003 154 [186,21-186,25], 159 [186,21-186,27] Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,24-186,27], Weber, G. 1928 31 [185,1-186,30], Ernst 1985 182 [186,21-186,24] Literaturgeschichte: Ehrismann, G. 1927 290 [186,21-186,27] Minne u. Ehe: Schumacher, Marlis 1967 19 [186,21-186,25], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kleber, J. 1992b 155 [186,21-187,1] Nacherzählung: Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 632 Anm. 58 [186,21-186,27] Namen: Passage 1984 183 [186,21-187,1], 184 [186,17-186,27], Schirok 1988c 433 Naturwissenschaft: Groos 1995 110 [186,21-186,29] Orient: Schäfer, H. 1983 86 [186,17-186,25], Ernst 1985 182 [186,21-186,24], Schäfer, H. 1985 90 [186,17-186,25] Parenthese: Lühr 1991 192 [186,21-186,25] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 60 [186,21-187,3], 96 [186,21-187,3], 104 [186,21-187,6], Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,24-186,27], Griffith 1911 80 Anm. 1 [186,21-186,27], Weber, G. 1928 31 [185,1-186,30], Passage 1984 183 [186,21-187,1], 184 [186,17-186,27] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,24-186,27], Weber, G. 1928 31 [185,1-186,30], Rachbauer 1934 94 [186,21-186,27], Rachbauer 1970 94 [186,21-186,27], Rachbauer 1980 94 [186,21-186,27], Sutter 2003 81 Anm. 313, 82 Anm. 317, 82 [186,21-186,27], 257, 265 Raum u. Bewegung: Wiesinger 1976a 254 [186,21-187,23], Jäger, D. 1998 30 [185,21-187,6] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Jäger, D. 1998 30 [185,21-187,6] Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Mersmann 1971 234, 236 Religion: Koppitz 1959 283 [186,21-186,27], Groos 1995 110 [186,21-186,29] Rezeption (primär): Kaminski 2003 39 Anm. 65 [186,21-186,25] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Passage 1984 183 [186,21-187,1], 184 [186,17-186,27], Lorenz, A. 2002 38 [186,21-186,27], 47 [186,21-186,27] Ritterorden: Schäfer, H. 1985 90 [186,17-186,25] Rittertum: Groos 1995 110 [186,21-186,29] Schionatulander: Passage 1984 183 [186,21-187,1], 184 [186,17-186,27] Sprache: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 71 Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 27 [186,24-186,27], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 71, Weber, G. 1928 31 [185,1-186,30], Mergell 1943 70 [186,21-186,25], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Syntax: Lühr 1991 192 [186,21-186,25] Titurel: Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 632 Anm. 58 [186,21-186,27], Passage 1984 183 [186,21-187,1], 184 [186,17-186,27], Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2002 193 [186,21-186,25], 195 [186,20-187,4], 203 [186,21-187,1], Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2003 154 [186,21-186,25], 159 [186,21-186,27] Überlieferung: Hofmeister, R. 1976a 94 [186,21-186,24] Übersetzung: Zeydel und Morgan 1951 348 [186,21-186,24], Nellmann 1994c 686 [186,21-186,25], 775, Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2002 193 [186,21-186,25], 195 [186,20-187,4], 203 [186,21-187,1], Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2003 154 [186,21-186,25], 159 [186,21-186,27] Verskunst: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 71 Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 42 [186,21-186,27], Bertau 1983i 199, Schmid, E. 1986 182, Jones, W. 1990 35, Sutter 2003 81 Anm. 313, 82 Anm. 317, 82 [186,21-186,27], 257, 265 Willehalm: Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 632 Anm. 58 [186,21-186,27], Schäfer, H. 1983 86 [186,17-186,25], Schäfer, H. 1985 90 [186,17-186,25] Wortschatz: Schultheiß 1937 42 [186,21-186,27], Mersmann 1971 234, 236, Wiesinger 1976a 254 [186,21-187,23] Zeitverhältnisse: Sutter 2003 81 Anm. 313, 82 Anm. 317, 82 [186,21-186,27], 257, 265
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)