199, 3 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 30 [199,3-199,4], Bernhardt 1901 376 [198,5-199,12], Hilka 1932 664 [198,23-199,12], Rachbauer 1934 122 [199,3-199,4], Mergell 1943 71 Anm. 3 [198,23-199,12], Rachbauer 1970 122 [199,3-199,4], Rachbauer 1980 122 [199,3-199,4], Groos 1993a 270 [198,3-199,12], Groos 2002 131 [198,3-199,12], Emmerling 2003 287 [197,28-199,14] Anakoluth: Horacek 1968 21 Artusepik: Emmel 1951 85 [199,3-199,5], Stein, Peter 2000 244 Anm. 654 [197,30-199,14] Buch II: Hartmann, Heiko 2000 259 [199,3-199,4] Charakterisierung: Classen 1988a 391 [198,29-199,7], 392 [198,3-199,9], Pastré 1994c 102 [198,2-199,14], Emmerling 2003 287 [197,28-199,14], Sosna 2003 181 [197,30-199,12], 182 Anm. 43 [198,13-199,12], Schröder, J. 2004 195 [198,15-199,13] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Kästner 1978 184 [197,28-199,14] Enjambement: Horacek 1968 21 Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 48 [199,1-199,6], 62 [199,3-199,4], 69-70 [198,29-199,9], 71 [199,3-199,4] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 71 Anm. 3 [198,23-199,12], Hirschberg 1976 354 [198,23-199,12], Groos 1993a 270 [198,3-199,12], Stein, A. 1993 104 Anm. 159 [197,30-199,12], Groos 1995 112 [198,3-199,12], Groos 2002 131 [198,3-199,12], Schu 2002 229 Anm. 33 [198,23-199,12], Urscheler 2002 238 [198,23-199,12], 239 [198,23-199,12] Erziehung: Grosse 1962 64 [197,28-199,14] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Frauen (allgemein): Classen 1987/88 85, Lienert 2002a 240 Anm. 71 [197,30-199,13], Classen 1987/88 85 Frauenfiguren: Emmerling 2003 287 [197,28-199,14] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 144 [198,18-200,9] Gattung: Haferland 1988 160 [196,24-199,21], Wessel-Fleinghaus 1992 74 Anm. 293 [197,30-199,13], Groos 1995 112 [198,3-199,12], Stein, Peter 2000 244 Anm. 654 [197,30-199,14], Schu 2002 229 Anm. 33 [198,23-199,12] Gawan-Handlung: Emmerling 2003 287 [197,28-199,14] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 243 [196,15-199,14] Geschichte: Roßkopf 1972 317 [197,30-199,12] Gewalt: Lienert 2002a 240 Anm. 71 [197,30-199,13] Grammatik: Bernhardt 1901 376 [198,5-199,12], Zwierzina 1901a 258 Anm. 2 [199,3-199,4], Adelberg 1960 146-47 [199,3-199,12], Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 148 [198,5-199,12] Handschriftliches: Bonath 1971 138 [199,3-199,6], 214 [199,3-199,6] Heinrich von dem Türlin: Stein, Peter 2000 244 Anm. 654 [197,30-199,14] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 195 [198,15-199,13] höfischer Roman: Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 148 [198,5-199,12], Haferland 1988 160 [196,24-199,21], Schu 2002 229 Anm. 33 [198,23-199,12], Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 148 [198,5-199,12] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Brall 1986 568 Anm. 45 [198,23-199,12] Individualität: Sosna 2003 181 [197,30-199,12], 182 Anm. 43 [198,13-199,12] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1992a 148 [198,2-199,14], Pastré 1995a 308 [198,2-199,14] Interpretation: Essen 1967 70 [198,23-199,12], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 317 [197,30-199,12], Brall 1986 568 Anm. 45 [198,23-199,12], Haferland 1988 160 [196,24-199,21], Groos 1993a 270 [198,3-199,12], Stein, A. 1993 104 Anm. 159 [197,30-199,12], Pratelidis 1994 72 [199,3-199,4], 78 [198,23-199,12], 211 [197,30-199,12], Groos 1995 112 [198,3-199,12], Steppich 1999 59 [198,23-199,14], Groos 2002 131 [198,3-199,12] Ither: Roßkopf 1972 317 [197,30-199,12] Jüngerer Titurel: Lorenz, A. 2002 168 [198,23-199,12] Keie: Classen 1988a 391 [198,29-199,7], 392 [198,3-199,9] Kommentar: Backes, S. 1999 101 [197,30-199,14], 108 [199,3-199,4], 148 [199,3-199,4], Garnerus 1999 25 [198,23-199,12], Gilmour 2000 327 [197,3-199,14], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 259 [199,3-199,4] Kommunikation: Kästner 1978 184 [197,28-199,14], Urscheler 2002 238 [198,23-199,12], 239 [198,23-199,12], Wandhoff 2002a 134 [197,30-199,12] Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 30 [199,3-199,4] Lesarten: Hofmeister, R. 1974b 30 [199,3-199,4], 31 Lichtmetaphorik: Cessari 2000 98 Anm. 72 [198,23-199,12] Männerfiguren: Classen 1988a 391 [198,29-199,7], 392 [198,3-199,9], Emmerling 2003 287 [197,28-199,14] Metrik: Horacek 1968 21 Minne u. Ehe: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kleber, J. 1992b 253 [199,3-199,12], Pastré 1995a 308 [198,2-199,14], Emmerling 2003 287 [197,28-199,14] Narrheit: Pastré 1994c 102 [198,2-199,14] Naturwissenschaft: Groos 1995 112 [198,3-199,12] Pädagogik: Essen 1967 70 [198,23-199,12] Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 182 Anm. 73 [198,23-199,22], 269 Anm. 21 [198,23-199,12] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 30 [199,3-199,4] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 30 [199,3-199,4], Rachbauer 1934 122 [199,3-199,4], Rachbauer 1970 122 [199,3-199,4], Rachbauer 1980 122 [199,3-199,4] Quellen - Keltisches: Steppich 1999 59 [198,23-199,14] Rache: Möbius 1993 253 Anm. 915 [198,23-199,12] Rappoltsteiner Parzifal: Oltrogge und Schubert 2002 363 [199,3-199,4] Raum u. Bewegung: Ramin 1994 45 Anm. 72 [198,23-199,12] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Reim: Zwierzina 1901a 258 Anm. 2 [199,3-199,4] Religion: Groos 1995 112 [198,3-199,12], Cessari 2000 98 Anm. 72 [198,23-199,12] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 144 [198,18-200,9], Kern, Peter 1981 182 Anm. 73 [198,23-199,22], 269 Anm. 21 [198,23-199,12], Stein, Peter 2000 244 Anm. 654 [197,30-199,14], Lorenz, A. 2002 168 [198,23-199,12], Oltrogge und Schubert 2002 363 [199,3-199,4] Rhetorik: Wessel-Fleinghaus 1992 74 Anm. 293 [197,30-199,13] Ritterethik: Keferstein 1937a 44 Anm. 4 [197,1-199,12], Wessel-Fleinghaus 1992 74 Anm. 293 [197,30-199,13], Althoff 2000 119 Anm. 48 [198,1-199,14], Emmerling 2003 287 [197,28-199,14] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Schröder, J. 2004 195 [198,15-199,13] Rittertum: Green 1978a 28 Anm. 2 [197,30-199,13], Groos 1995 112 [198,3-199,12], Pastré 1995a 308 [198,2-199,14] Schuld: Keferstein 1937a 44 Anm. 4 [197,1-199,12] Soziologie: Pratelidis 1994 72 [199,3-199,4], 78 [198,23-199,12], 211 [197,30-199,12] Sprache: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 48 [199,1-199,6], 62 [199,3-199,4], 69-70 [198,29-199,9], 71 [199,3-199,4], Barufke 1995 20, Tao 1997 141 [199,3-199,10] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 30 [199,3-199,4], Zwierzina 1901a 258 Anm. 2 [199,3-199,4], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 48 [199,1-199,6], 62 [199,3-199,4], 69-70 [198,29-199,9], 71 [199,3-199,4], Mergell 1943 71 Anm. 3 [198,23-199,12], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Syntax: Mourek 1911 12 [199,3-199,4], Horacek 1968 21 Traummotivik: Roßkopf 1972 317 [197,30-199,12] tumpheit: Pastré 1994c 102 [198,2-199,14] Überlieferung: Bonath 1971 138 [199,3-199,6], 214 [199,3-199,6], Hofmeister, R. 1972b 703 Anm. 5 [199,3-199,4], Hofmeister, R. 1974b 30 [199,3-199,4], 31, Hofmeister, R. 1976a 111 [199,3-199,4], Oltrogge und Schubert 2002 363 [199,3-199,4] Verskunst: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 48 [199,1-199,6], 62 [199,3-199,4], 69-70 [198,29-199,9], 71 [199,3-199,4] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Brall 1986 568 Anm. 45 [198,23-199,12] elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Hartmann, Heiko 2000 259 [199,3-199,4] vreude: Steppich 1999 59 [198,23-199,14] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 354 [198,23-199,12], Pastré 1992a 148 [198,2-199,14], Stein, A. 1993 104 Anm. 159 [197,30-199,12], Pastré 1995a 308 [198,2-199,14] Willehalm: Wessel-Fleinghaus 1992 74 Anm. 293 [197,30-199,13] Wortsinn: Pretzel 1982 11 [199,3-199,4] Zeitverhältnisse: Rührmund 1848 466 [196,20-199,14]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)