| 202,19 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben) | [Zu 202,18] |
|
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 71 Anm. 3 [201,19-203,11], Pastré 1979 374 [201,18-203,11], 377 [201,18-203,11], 378 [201,18-203,11]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 111, Pastré 1994c 101 [201,21-202,22], 104 [201,21-202,22] Condwiramurs: Kinzel 1889 65 [201,21-202,20] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Schreiber, A. 1922 124 [201,21-202,20], 125 [202,19-202,20], 128, Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 68, 150 [201,21-202,20] Erzähltechnik: Richey 1923b 89 Anm. 94 [202,19-202,20], Walker, E. 1928 113 [202,19-202,20], Richey 1957j 165 [202,19-202,20], Green 1981a 105, Groos 1993a 266 [202,5-202,19], Garnerus 1999 207 [202,19-202,22], Groos 2002 127 [202,5-202,19], Schu 2002 344 [201,19-202,28] Fest: Ehlert 1991 398 [201,19-203,1] französischer Wortschatz: Suolahti 1933 323 Frauen (allgemein): Ehrismann, O. 1987a 45-46 [201,19-203,11], Rinn 1996 92 [201,19-203,1] Frauenfiguren: Carne 1970 3 [201,21-203,11] Gral: Falk 1985c 166 [201,19-203,11] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 154 Anm. 112 [201,19-203,1], 194 Anm. 237 [201,19-203,1] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 327 [201,1-202,30], Bayer, Hans 1978 42 [201,19-203,11] Humor: Kant 1878 51 [202,19-203,11], Coxon 2002 132 Anm. 63 [201,19-202,28] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1992a 147 [201,21-202,22], Pastré 1993c 190-91 [201,21-202,22], Pastré 1993d 67 [201,8-203,1], Pastré 1995a 306 [201,24-202,22] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 819 [202,19-202,28], Weber, G. 1948 31 [201,19-203,1], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 214 Anm. 1 [201,21-203,1], Kratz, H. 1973a 244-45 [202,2-202,20], Dewald 1975 273 Anm. 16, Green 1980a 393 [201,19-203,10], Ruh 1980 126, Green 1982a 55 [201,21-203,6], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 108 [201,19-203,10], Schmid, E. 1993b 182 [201,19-203,1], Groos 1995 107 [202,5-202,19], Mertens, V. 1998 121 [202,6-202,22], Gilmour 2000 327 [201,19-203,10], Reichert, H. 2002 90-92 [201,19-203,10] Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 212 Anm. 858 [202,17-203,10] Jungfräulichkeit: Müller, Maria E 1995 331 [201,19-203,10] Kindheit u. Jugend: Schultz, J. 1995b 54 Anm. 74 [201,21-203,11] Minne u. Ehe: San-Marte 1862b 151 [201,21-202,28], Curschmann 1964 157 [201,18-203,10], Schumacher, Marlis 1967 39 Anm. 34 [201,21-203,1], 39 [201,19-203,11], 41 [201,21-203,1], 44 [202,19-202,22], 49 [201,18-203,1], Faber 1973 258-59 Anm. 37 [201,21-203,1], Wehrli 1980 310 [202,2-203,11], Schnell, Rüdiger 1985a 404 Anm. 257 [201,19-203,10], Wehrli 1997 310 [202,2-203,11] Periphrase u. Umschreibung: Kratz, H. 1973a 89 Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 7 [201,21-202,20], 80 [201,19-203,11], Marx 1952 211 [200,19-203,11], Marx 1981 211 [200,19-203,11] Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 101 [202,19-203,11], Rachbauer 1970 101 [202,19-203,11], Rachbauer 1980 101 [202,19-203,11] Religion: Weber, R. 1918 383-84 [201,21-202,22] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 146 [201,19-203,10], Blamires 1973d 41 [201,19-203,1], Belitz 1978 196 [201,21-203,11], Lorenz, A. 2002 328 [201,19-203,10] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 205 [201,19-203,11], Niermann 2004 211 [201,21-203,11] Sexuelles u. Geschlechterbeziehungen: Bayer, Hans 1983 35 [201,19-202,25], Brunner, K. 1998 251 Anm. 30 [201,19-203,10] Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Stein, W. 1988 95 [202,2-203,1] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 391 [202,19-203,10], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Welter 1974 37, 38 Anm. 12 [202,19-202,22], 38 [202,19-203,11], 42, Pastré 1978 84 [201,18-203,11] Tugenden: Pastré 1994e 232 [201,8-203,1] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 98 Anm. 10 [202,19-202,20] Übersetzungsproblematik: Grubmüller 1988a 160 [202,19-202,22] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Lee, A. 1957 144 [201,19-203,11] | |
| [Zu 202,20] | |