205,10 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 205, 9]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 21 Anm. 18 [205,9-205,10], 41 Anm. 59 [205,9-205,16], 71 Anm. 3 [205,9-205,16] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 48 [205,9-205,12], 59 [205,9-205,16] Erzähltechnik: Gerz 1930 68 [205,9-205,12], Gerz 1967 68 [205,9-205,12] Hartmann von Aue: Golther 1925a 154 [205,9-205,14] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Rahn 1933 324 [205,1-206,30] Interpretation: Mohr 1965b 186 Anm. 5 [205,9-205,16], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Mohr 1979h 150 Anm. 5 [205,9-205,16], Pérennec 1984f 204 [205,9-205,12] Interpretation - Strukturalismus: Simon, R. 1990 210 [205,9-205,16] Ironie: Green 1979a 62 Anm. 1 [205,9-205,16], 143 [205,9-205,12], 267 [205,9-205,12] Krieg u. Heerzug: Jackson, William Henry 1999 170 [205,9-205,16] Namen: Kleiber 1962 83 [205,9-205,16], Mohr 1979q 470, 472, Schröder, Werner 1982b 46, Chandler 1992 109 Quellen - allgemein: San-Marte 1842 307 Anm. 21 [205,9-205,10] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 31 [205,9-205,14], Rachbauer 1934 102 [205,9-205,16], Fourquet 1938b 55 [205,9-205,16], Fourquet 1966b 36 [205,9-205,16], Rachbauer 1970 102 [205,9-205,16], Rachbauer 1980 102 [205,9-205,16] Rittertum: Mohr 1968a 128 [205,9-205,16], Green 1978a 38 [205,9-205,16], Mohr 1979p 352 [205,9-205,16] Soziologie: Lawn 1977 23 [205,10-205,16] Sprache: Tao 1997 139 [205,9-205,12] Stil: Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18]
	[Zu 205,11]