221, 3 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 34 [220,25-221,6], 85 [221,1-221,6], Weber, G. 1928 41 [220,25-222,9], Rachbauer 1934 109 [220,25-221,6], 130 [220,30-221,3], Fourquet 1938b 55-56 [220,30-221,9], Stockum 1941 15 [221,2-221,9], Fourquet 1966b 37 [220,30-221,9], Rachbauer 1970 109 [220,25-221,6], 130 [220,30-221,3], Rachbauer 1980 109 [220,25-221,6], 130 [220,30-221,3] Anakoluth: Horacek 1968 118 [221,2-221,3] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6] Artusepik: Emmel 1951 90-91 [220,30-221,12] Charakterisierung: Mohr 1952/53 47 [220,30-221,6], Mohr 1962b 137 [220,30-221,6], Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6], Mohr 1952/53 47 [220,30-221,6] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6] Enjambement: Horacek 1954/55 225 [221,2-221,3], Horacek 1968 118 [221,2-221,3], Horacek 1954/55 225 [221,2-221,3] Erzähltechnik: Green 1982b 147 Anm. 53 [221,1-221,6], Stein, A. 1993 105 Anm. 163 [220,30-221,6] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Forschungsbericht: Stockum 1941 15 [221,2-221,9] Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6] Gawan: Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 247 Anm. 85 [220,30-221,12], 247 [216,5-222,9] Geschichte: Roßkopf 1972 295 [221,1-221,12] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 96, Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 145 [221,2-221,6] Heinrich von dem Türlin: Cormeau 1977a 141 [221,2-221,3] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6] höfischer Roman: Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 145 [221,2-221,6], [221,2-221,6] höfisches Leben: Mersmann 1971 21 [221,2-221,3], 211 [221,2-221,3], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6] Interpretation: Mersmann 1971 21 [221,2-221,3], 211 [221,2-221,3], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 295 [221,1-221,12], Green 1982b 147 Anm. 53 [221,1-221,6], Stein, A. 1993 105 Anm. 163 [220,30-221,6], Pratelidis 1994 110 [220,30-221,6] Ither: Roßkopf 1972 295 [221,1-221,12] Kommentar: Garnerus 1999 59 [221,2-221,9], 167 [221,2-221,3] Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 34 [220,25-221,6], 85 [221,1-221,6], Weber, G. 1928 41 [220,25-222,9], Stockum 1941 15 [221,2-221,9] Medizin: Haferlach 1991 58 Anm. 14 [220,28-221,6] Metrik: Horacek 1968 118 [221,2-221,3], Horacek 1954/55 225 [221,2-221,3] Minne u. Ehe: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kleber, J. 1992b 256 [221,2-221,6] Parzival: Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 34 [220,25-221,6], 85 [221,1-221,6], Weber, G. 1928 41 [220,25-222,9], Fourquet 1938b 55-56 [220,30-221,9], Stockum 1941 15 [221,2-221,9], Fourquet 1966b 37 [220,30-221,9] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 34 [220,25-221,6], 85 [221,1-221,6], Weber, G. 1928 41 [220,25-222,9], Rachbauer 1934 109 [220,25-221,6], 130 [220,30-221,3], Fourquet 1938b 55-56 [220,30-221,9], Fourquet 1966b 37 [220,30-221,9], Rachbauer 1970 109 [220,25-221,6], 130 [220,30-221,3], Rachbauer 1980 109 [220,25-221,6], 130 [220,30-221,3] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Mersmann 1971 21 [221,2-221,3], 211 [221,2-221,3] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Cormeau 1977a 141 [221,2-221,3] Rittertum: Green 1978a 56 Anm. 4 [220,30-221,9] Soziologie: Pratelidis 1994 110 [220,30-221,6] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 34 [220,25-221,6], 85 [221,1-221,6], Riemer, G. 1906 75, Weber, G. 1928 41 [220,25-222,9], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Syntax: Horacek 1968 118 [221,2-221,3] Traummotivik: Roßkopf 1972 295 [221,1-221,12] Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 370 [221,2-221,6] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 110 [220,5-221,21] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 114 [221,2-221,6] Werkstruktur: Stein, A. 1993 105 Anm. 163 [220,30-221,6] Wirnt von Grafenberg: Cormeau 1977a 141 [221,2-221,3] Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 75, Mersmann 1971 21 [221,2-221,3], 211 [221,2-221,3]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)