248,24 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 62 [248,20-248,30], Rachbauer 1934 153 [248,19-248,30], 172 [247,19-249,2], Stockum 1941 19 [248,17-248,30], Mergell 1943 140 [248,17-248,30], Rachbauer 1970 153 [248,19-248,30], 172 [247,19-249,2], Rachbauer 1980 153 [248,19-248,30], 172 [247,19-249,2] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30] Artusepik: Trachsler, E. 1979 255 Anm. 69 [248,17-249,8], Roßnagel 1996 32 Anm. 56 [248,19-248,30], Ringeler 2000 137 Anm. 75 [248,19-248,30] âventiure: Green 1978c 151 [248,19-248,30] Blutstropfenepisode: Schirok 2002b 109 [248,17-248,30] Buch I: Green 1977a 179 Anm. 95 [248,19-248,30] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30], Ortmann 1972 129 [248,19-248,30], Ringeler 2000 137 Anm. 75 [248,19-248,30], Schröder, J. 2004 220 [248,6-249,3], 221 [247,5-249,8] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30] Erzähler: Green 1979a 78 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], 156 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30] Erzähltechnik: Schwartzkopff 1909 33 [248,19-248,30], Walker, E. 1928 235 [248,19-248,30], 239 [248,19-248,30], 240 [248,19-248,30], 268 Anm. 22 [248,19-248,30], 286 Anm. 153 [248,19-248,30], Mergell 1943 140 [248,17-248,30], Ortmann 1972 129 [248,19-248,30], Green 1974a 17 Anm. 42 [248,19-248,30], Hirschberg 1976 105 [247,21-248,30], Green 1977a 179 Anm. 95 [248,19-248,30], Green 1978c 151 [248,19-248,30], Green 1979a 78 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], 156 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 8 [248,17-249,8], Green 1982b 96 [248,19-248,30], Green 2002e 159 [248,19-248,30], Schu 2002 198 Anm. 214 [248,19-248,30], 270 [248,19-248,30] ethischer Wortschatz: Maurer 1951b 133 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1958b 13 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1966a 303 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1979e 78 [248,19-248,30] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Forschungsbericht: Stockum 1941 19 [248,17-248,30], Horacek 1952b 321 [248,19-248,30] Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30] Gattung: Schu 2002 198 Anm. 214 [248,19-248,30], 270 [248,19-248,30] Gawan: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30], Shockey 2002 322 Anm. 104 [247,1-248,30] Gawan-Handlung: Clifton-Everest 1980 153 [248,19-248,30], Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 8 [248,17-249,8] Gefühle: Ridder 1999 30 [248,6-248,30] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 259 [248,1-248,30] Geschichte: Roßkopf 1972 267 [248,20-248,28] Gral: Mockenhaupt 1968 85 [248,19-249,1], 181 [248,17-248,30] Heinrich von dem Türlin: Mentzel-Reuters 1989 278 [248,17-249,2], Shockey 2002 322 Anm. 104 [247,1-248,30] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 220 [248,6-249,3], 221 [247,5-249,8] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30] höfischer Roman: Green 1974a 17 Anm. 42 [248,19-248,30], Green 1979a 78 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], 156 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], Schu 2002 198 Anm. 214 [248,19-248,30], 270 [248,19-248,30] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30] Interpretation: Maurer 1951b 133 [248,19-248,30], Maurer 1956a 54 [248,19-248,28], Mohr 1958b 13 [248,19-248,30], Maurer 1963d 45 [248,19-248,28], Mohr 1966a 303 [248,19-248,30], Johnson, S. 1970a 110 [248,19-248,30], Maurer 1971c 45 [248,19-248,28], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 267 [248,20-248,28], Wieners 1973 59 [248,19-248,30], Green 1978c 151 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1979e 78 [248,19-248,30], Trachsler, E. 1979 255 Anm. 69 [248,17-249,8], Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 8 [248,17-249,8], Green 1982b 96 [248,19-248,30], Pratelidis 1994 213 [248,17-248,30], Roßnagel 1996 32 Anm. 56 [248,19-248,30], Blank 1999 215 [248,17-249,10], Green 2002e 159 [248,19-248,30], Shockey 2002 322 Anm. 104 [247,1-248,30] Ironie: Green 1979a 78 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], 156 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30] Ither: Roßkopf 1972 267 [248,20-248,28] kiusche: Philipowski, K. 2002 116 [248,19-248,28] Kommentar: Schmidt, E. 1979 494 zitiert als 284,28, Kordt 1997 195, Gilmour 2000 206 Kommunikation: Schwartzkopff 1909 33 [248,19-248,30] Kreuzzug u. Pilgerfahrt: Semper 1934 121 Anm. 1 [248,1-249,8], Samson-Himmelstjerna 2004 222 Anm. 336 [248,18-249,2] Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 62 [248,20-248,30], Stockum 1941 19 [248,17-248,30] Literaturgeschichte: Ehrismann, O. und Kaminsky 1976 215 [248,17-248,30] Memoria: Ridder 1999 30 [248,6-248,30] Minne u. Ehe: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Green 1979a 78 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], 156 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], Philipowski, K. 2002 116 [248,19-248,28] Orient: Semper 1934 121 Anm. 1 [248,1-249,8], Green 1977a 179 Anm. 95 [248,19-248,30] Parzival: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30] Philologie: Green 1978c 151 [248,19-248,30], Clifton-Everest 1980 153 [248,19-248,30] Prosa-Lancelot: Philipowski, K. 2002 116 [248,19-248,28] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 62 [248,20-248,30], Semper 1934 121 Anm. 1 [248,1-249,8], Stockum 1941 19 [248,17-248,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 62 [248,20-248,30], Rachbauer 1934 153 [248,19-248,30], 172 [247,19-249,2], Rachbauer 1970 153 [248,19-248,30], 172 [247,19-249,2], Rachbauer 1980 153 [248,19-248,30], 172 [247,19-249,2] Raum u. Bewegung: Green 1977a 179 Anm. 95 [248,19-248,30], Trachsler, E. 1979 255 Anm. 69 [248,17-249,8], Shockey 2002 322 Anm. 104 [247,1-248,30], Glaser 2004 145 [248,17-248,30], 151 [248,17-249,8] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Religion: Ehrismann, G. 1908 422 [248,19-248,28], Weber, G. 1935 17 [248,19-248,30], Mockenhaupt 1942 85 [248,19-249,1], 181 [248,17-248,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 85 [248,19-249,1], 181 [248,17-248,30], Wieners 1973 59 [248,19-248,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Mentzel-Reuters 1989 278 [248,17-249,2], Roßnagel 1996 32 Anm. 56 [248,19-248,30], Philipowski, K. 2002 116 [248,19-248,28], Shockey 2002 322 Anm. 104 [247,1-248,30] Ritterethik: Mohr 1951/52 151 [248,19-248,30], Ehrismann, G. 1908 422 [248,19-248,28], Maurer 1951b 133 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1962a 199 [248,19-248,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 85 [248,19-249,1], 181 [248,17-248,30], Mohr 1970 337 [248,19-248,30], Wieners 1973 59 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1979c 19 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 2002 142 [248,19-248,30], Philipowski, K. 2002 116 [248,19-248,28], Mohr 1951/52 151 [248,19-248,30] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Schröder, J. 2004 220 [248,6-249,3], 221 [247,5-249,8] Rittertum: Green 1978c 151 [248,19-248,30], Green 1979a 78 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], 156 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], Trachsler, E. 1979 255 Anm. 69 [248,17-249,8], Clifton-Everest 1980 153 [248,19-248,30] Schuld: Maurer 1950 315 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1962a 199 [248,19-248,30], Maurer 1966 63 [248,19-248,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 85 [248,19-249,1], 181 [248,17-248,30], Mohr 1970 337 [248,19-248,30], Wieners 1973 59 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1979c 19 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 2002 142 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1951/52 151 [248,19-248,30] Soziologie: Pratelidis 1994 213 [248,17-248,30] Sprachgeschichte: Maurer 1951b 133 [248,19-248,30] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 62 [248,20-248,30], Schwartzkopff 1909 33 [248,19-248,30], Mergell 1943 140 [248,17-248,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Sünde: Maurer 1950 315 [248,19-248,30], Maurer 1951b 133 [248,19-248,30], Maurer 1966 63 [248,19-248,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 85 [248,19-249,1], 181 [248,17-248,30] Syntax: Erbe 1878 46 [248,22-248,24] Traummotivik: Roßkopf 1972 267 [248,20-248,28] Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 132 [248,19-248,30] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 124 [248,19-248,30] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Mohr 1958b 13 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1966a 303 [248,19-248,30], Mohr 1979e 78 [248,19-248,30] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Schirok 2002b 109 [248,17-248,30] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 105 [247,21-248,30], Green 1979a 78 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], 156 Anm. 2 [248,19-248,30], Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 8 [248,17-249,8] Willehalm: Schmidt, E. 1979 494 zitiert als 284,28 Wortschatz: Trachsler, E. 1979 255 Anm. 69 [248,17-249,8] Zeitverhältnisse: Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 8 [248,17-249,8]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)