254,17 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 254,16]
Adaptation: Burdach 1938 524 [254,17-255,20], Mergell 1943 153 [254,17-255,4], Weigand, H. 1952 496 Anm. 19 [253,24-254,19], Weigand, H. 1969c 93 Anm. 22 [253,24-254,19], Burdach 1974 524 [254,17-255,20], Backes, S. 1999 38 [253,24-254,30], 41 [253,25-254,19], 46 [253,24-254,30] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 87 Anm. 59 [253,19-254,30] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 129 [253,19-254,30], Ringeler 2000 139 Anm. 84 [253,24-254,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Bertau 1972/73 781 [254,15-254,22], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 49 [254,15-254,19], Bertau 1972 88 Anm. 61 [254,15-254,30], Bertau 1983c 40 Anm. 27 [254,15-254,30] Erzähltechnik: Parshall 1981 112 [253,24-254,19], Green 1982b 112 [253,24-254,30], Green 2002e 168 [253,24-254,30], Urscheler 2002 164 [253,19-254,30] ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 198 [254,15-254,19] Geographie: Passage 1984 216 [253,1-254,30] Gral: Ehrismann, G. 1927 253 [253,24-254,30], Burdach 1938 508-09 [254,17-254,30], Mergell 1951b 9 [254,17-254,19], Mergell 1952b 9 [254,17-254,19], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 40 [254,15-254,30], Burdach 1974 508-09 [254,17-254,30] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Bayer, Hans 1978 63 [254,15-254,19] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 361-62 [254,15-254,30] Interpretation: Misch 1927 287 Anm. 1 [254,1-254,19], Weber, G. 1948 44 [254,7-254,30], Mersmann 1971 136 [253,25-254,30], Schröder, Werner 1971a 125 [254,16-254,17], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 286 Anm. 1 [254,2-254,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 261 [252,9-254,19], Poag 1974a 278 [254,15-254,19], Dewald 1975 252 Anm. 4 [254,15-254,30], Huber, H. 1981 277 Anm. 255 [253,24-254,30], Pérennec 1984f 191 [253,25-254,19], [254,16-254,30], Wynn 1984 207 [253,24-254,30], Lampe 1987b 276 [254,15-254,19], 369 Anm. 142 [254,2-254,30], Haferland 1988 311 Anm. 30 [253,24-254,30], Czerwinski 1989 109 [253,24-254,19], Schröder, Werner 1989q 234 [254,16-254,17], Lampe 1990 265-66 [254,2-254,19], Nellmann 1994c 585 [254,17-254,30], 594 [254,17-254,30], Kordt 1997 143 [253,25-254,30], 147 [254,17-254,30], Backes, S. 1999 43 [254,17-254,30], 171, 176 [254,15-254,19], Steppich 1999 69 Anm. 78 [254,15-254,30] Kommunikation: James-Raoul 1997 299 Anm. 3 [254,1-254,30] Körper u. Körperteile: Gilmour 2000 130 Medizin: Pastré 1993c 361-62 [254,15-254,30] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Bock, L. 1879 27 [254,17-254,19] Minne u. Ehe: Kleber, J. 1992b 229 [254,15-254,19] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 43 [254,15-254,30], 73 [253,19-255,20], Hagen, P. 1900 86 [253,24-254,30], Burdach 1938 532 [254,15-255,20], Burdach 1974 532 [254,15-255,20] Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 155 [253,25-254,30], 156 [254,17-254,29], Hatto 1949 383 Anm. 10 [253,24-254,30], 384-85 [254,15-255,3], Rachbauer 1970 155 [253,25-254,30], 156 [254,17-254,29], Hatto 1980g 163 [254,15-255,3], 341 Anm. 52 [253,24-254,30], Rachbauer 1980 155 [253,25-254,30], 156 [254,17-254,29] Quellen - Keltisches: Los 1927 52 [254,15-254,19] Religion: Weber, R. 1918 387 [253,19-254,30], Bayer, Hans 1983 372 [254,15-254,19] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Zingerle, I. 1860 471 [253,24-254,30], Nyholm 1964 175 [254,4-254,19] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Winkler 1988 569 [253,24-254,19] Ritterethik: Voß, R. 1998 33 [253,19-255,29] Schuld: Schröder, F. 1959 18 [253,24-254,30], Schröder, F. 1966 366 [253,24-254,30], Nagel, B. 1977 585 Anm. 3 [252,16-255,29] Sigune: Heise 1957 45 [254,15-256,10], Braunagel 1999 14 [253,19-254,30], 17 Stil: Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Syntax: Horacek 1964 240 [254,17-254,19] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Busse, Werner 1979 123 [251,21-255,1] Wortschatz: Schultheiß 1937 7 [254,15-254,30]
	[Zu 254,18]