255, 3 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) 
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 216 [255,1-255,29]
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 88 [255,2-255,20], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30], Mergell 1943 143 [255,1-255,20], 153 [254,17-255,4], 198 Anm. 108 [255,2-255,20], Weigand, H. 1952 505-06 [255,2-255,11], Weigand, H. 1969c 110 [255,2-255,11], Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20]
Artusepik: Roßnagel 1996 36 Anm. 70 [255,2-255,29], Ringeler 2000 137 [255,2-255,20], 138 [255,2-255,4]
Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 650 [255,2-255,20]
Blutstropfenepisode: Welz 1976 89 [255,2-255,9]
Buch III: Yeandle 1984 71 [255,1-255,20]
Buch V: Weigand, H. 1952 505-06 [255,2-255,11], Weigand, H. 1969c 110 [255,2-255,11]
Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 129 [255,2-255,20], Ringeler 2000 137 [255,2-255,20], 138 [255,2-255,4], Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20]
Cundrie la surziere: Breyer 1996 62 [255,2-255,30], Böhland 2001 53 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,30]
Datierung: Schröder, Werner 1989a 15, Schröder, Werner 1999h 333
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Matz 1907 50
Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 143 [255,1-255,20], 153 [254,17-255,4], 198 Anm. 108 [255,2-255,20], Ortmann 1972 129 [255,2-255,20], Harroff 1974 62 [255,1-255,30], Hirschberg 1976 131 [255,2-255,20], 134 [255,2-255,20], 135 [255,2-255,20], Parshall 1981 267 Anm. 57 [255,1-255,20], Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29], Green 1982b 206 Anm. 105 [254,28-255,20], Urscheler 2002 151 [254,28-255,19], 164 [255,2-255,20]
Erziehung: Grosse 1962 65 [254,30-255,7]
ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 254 [255,1-255,30], Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Szövérffy 1976 95 [255,1-255,30], Szövérffy 1977b 43 [255,1-255,30], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20]
Exotisches: Böhland 2001 53 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,30]
Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Fragen: Helm 1953 101 [255,2-255,20], 102 [254,30-255,19]
Frauenfiguren: Heise 1957 45 [254,15-256,10], Breyer 1996 62 [255,2-255,30], Niermann 1998 77 [255,2-255,29], 108-09 [255,2-255,20], Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20]
das Fremde: Welz 1976 89 [255,2-255,9]
Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 151 [255,1-257,30]
Gawan: Daiber 1999 195 Anm. 257 [255,2-255,20]
Gawan-Handlung: Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29], Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20]
Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 262 [255,2-255,20], McFarland 2000 60 [255,1-255,30]
Geschichte: Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30]
Gral: San-Marte 1861 254 [255,1-255,30], Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 268 [255,1-255,7], Burdach 1938 524 [254,17-255,20], 532 [254,15-255,20], Burdach 1974 524 [254,17-255,20], 532 [254,15-255,20]
groteske Figuren: Breyer 1996 62 [255,2-255,30], Böhland 2001 53 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,30]
Handschriftliches: Lampe 1987b 272 [254,30-255,3], Schröder, Werner 1989a 15, Schröder, Werner 1999h 333, Stephan-Chlustin 2004 216 [255,1-255,29]
Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20]
Heinrich von dem Türlin: Zingerle, I. 1860 470 [255,1-255,20], Keller, J. 1997 402 Anm. 292 [255,2-255,4]
Heldendichtung: Schröder, Werner 1989a 15, Schröder, Werner 1999h 333
Herzeloyde: Welz 1976 89 [255,2-255,9], Niermann 1998 77 [255,2-255,29], 108-09 [255,2-255,20]
heterodoxe Einflüsse: Schröder, F. 1928 16 [255,2-255,6]
Hilfe u. Rat: Voß, R. 1998 33 [253,19-255,29]
höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Interpretation: Alker 1953 8 [255,1-255,6], Johnson, S. 1970a 111 [255,2-256,9], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wieners 1973 125 [254,30-255,19], Welz 1976 89 [255,2-255,9], Nagel, B. 1978 93 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Nagel, B. 1981b 126 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29], Green 1982b 206 Anm. 105 [254,28-255,20], Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30], Lampe 1987b 272 [254,30-255,3], Steppich 1990 265 [255,1-255,20], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 105 [255,2-255,20], Roßnagel 1996 36 Anm. 70 [255,2-255,29], Störmer-Caysa 1998b 34 [254,20-255,20], Steppich 1999 63 [255,1-255,20]
Intertextualität: Schröder, Werner 1989a 15, Schröder, Werner 1999h 333
Jüngerer Titurel: Parshall 1981 267 Anm. 57 [255,1-255,20], Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30]
Keie: Daiber 1999 195 Anm. 257 [255,2-255,20]
Kommentar: Yeandle 1984 71 [255,1-255,20], Nellmann 1994c 650 [255,2-255,20], Kordt 1997 168, Backes, S. 1999 46 [255,1-255,30], Gilmour 2000 185 [254,30-255,6]
Kommunikation: Urscheler 2002 151 [254,28-255,19], 164 [255,2-255,20], Godsall-Myers 2003b 96 [255,2-255,29]
Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 88 [255,2-255,20], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30]
Literaturgeschichte: Nagel, B. 1977 585 Anm. 3 [252,16-255,29], Bräuer 1990 285 [255,1-255,20], Johnson, L. 1999 336 [255,2-255,20], 339 [255,2-255,20]
Longinuslegende: Burdach 1938 524 [254,17-255,20], 532 [254,15-255,20], Burdach 1974 524 [254,17-255,20], 532 [254,15-255,20]
Männerfiguren: Meister 1990a 262 [255,2-255,4], Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20]
Märchen: Junk 1912 157 [255,2-255,20]
Minne u. Ehe: Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20]
Mündlichkeit: Sussman 1995 68 [255,2-255,4]
Namen: Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30], Braunagel 1999 14 [255,2-255,16]
Nibelungenlied u. Nibelungenklage: Schröder, Werner 1989a 15, Schröder, Werner 1999h 333
Pädagogik: Heise 1957 45 [254,15-256,10]
Parzival: Meister 1990a 262 [255,2-255,4]
Philosophie: Alker 1953 8 [255,1-255,6]
Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20]
Psychologie: Welz 1976 89 [255,2-255,9], Sussman 1995 68 [255,2-255,4]
Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 73 [253,19-255,20], Lichtenstein 1897 88 [255,2-255,20], Junk 1912 157 [255,2-255,20], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30], Burdach 1938 524 [254,17-255,20], 532 [254,15-255,20], Burdach 1974 524 [254,17-255,20], 532 [254,15-255,20], Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30]
Quellen - Chrétien: Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 268 [255,1-255,7], Lichtenstein 1897 88 [255,2-255,20], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30], Hatto 1949 384-85 [254,15-255,3], Hatto 1980g 163 [254,15-255,3]
Quellen - Keltisches: Steppich 1999 63 [255,1-255,20]
Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Matz 1907 50
Reim: Matz 1907 50
Religion: San-Marte 1861 254 [255,1-255,30], Knorr 1934b 364 [255,1-255,20], Adolf 1950b 297 [255,2-255,20], Simson 1953 32 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Simson 1966 216 [255,2-255,20], Wieners 1973 125 [254,30-255,19], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Lampe 1987b 272 [254,30-255,3]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Zingerle, I. 1860 470 [255,1-255,20], Nyholm 1964 151 [255,1-257,30], Parshall 1981 267 Anm. 57 [255,1-255,20], Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30], Roßnagel 1996 36 Anm. 70 [255,2-255,29], Keller, J. 1997 402 Anm. 292 [255,2-255,4], Daiber 1999 195 Anm. 257 [255,2-255,20]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Niermann 1998 77 [255,2-255,29], 108-09 [255,2-255,20]
Ritterethik: Keferstein 1937a 55 Anm. 9 [255,2-255,30], Wieners 1973 125 [254,30-255,19], Szövérffy 1977b 43 [255,1-255,30], Voß, R. 1998 33 [253,19-255,29], Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20]
schame: Szövérffy 1976 95 [255,1-255,30], Szövérffy 1977b 43 [255,1-255,30]
Schicksal u. Fortuna: Alker 1953 8 [255,1-255,6]
Schionatulander: Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30]
Schuld: Keferstein 1937a 55 Anm. 9 [255,2-255,30], Adolf 1950b 297 [255,2-255,20], Wieners 1973 125 [254,30-255,19], Szövérffy 1976 95 [255,1-255,30], Szövérffy 1977b 43 [255,1-255,30]
Sigune: Niermann 1998 77 [255,2-255,29], 108-09 [255,2-255,20], Braunagel 1999 14 [255,2-255,16]
Soziologie: Welz 1976 89 [255,2-255,9]
Sprache: Kloocke, H. 1974 54 [255,2-255,6]
Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Lampe 1987b 272 [254,30-255,3], Sussman 1995 68 [255,2-255,4]
Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 88 [255,2-255,20], Riemer, G. 1906 88, Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30], Mergell 1943 143 [255,1-255,20], 153 [254,17-255,4], 198 Anm. 108 [255,2-255,20], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kloocke, H. 1974 54 [255,2-255,6]
Suche: Harroff 1974 62 [255,1-255,30]
Sünde: Helm 1953 101 [255,2-255,20], 102 [254,30-255,19], Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20]
Syntax: Kloocke, H. 1974 54 [255,2-255,6]
Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Fuchs-Jolie 2003 206 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,4]
Titurel: Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30], Braunagel 1999 14 [255,2-255,16], Fuchs-Jolie 2003 206 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,4]
tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 112 [255,2-255,7], 134 [255,2-255,20]
Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 115 [254,27-255,8], Stephan-Chlustin 2004 216 [255,1-255,29]
Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 650 [255,2-255,20]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 43 [255,2-255,16], Harroff 1974 62 [255,1-255,30], Delabar 1990 259 [255,2-255,20]
vreude: Steppich 1999 63 [255,1-255,20]
Wagner, Richard: Alker 1953 8 [255,1-255,6]
Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Hirschberg 1976 131 [255,2-255,20], 134 [255,2-255,20], 135 [255,2-255,20], Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20]
Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 88, Schultheiß 1937 43 [255,2-255,16], Fuchs-Jolie 2003 206 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,4]
Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20]
Zauberei: Ernst 1995 123 [255,2-255,20]
Zeitverhältnisse: Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29]
zwîvel: Adolf 1950b 297 [255,2-255,20], Helm 1953 101 [255,2-255,20], 102 [254,30-255,19], Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20]
 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)