255, 6 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 255, 5]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 216 [255,1-255,29] Adaptation: Kellermann, W. 1936 103 [255,4-255,11], Burdach 1938 524 [254,17-255,20], 526 [255,5-255,11], Stockum 1941 19 [255,5-255,7], Mergell 1943 143 [255,1-255,20], 153 [255,5-255,20], 198 Anm. 108 [255,2-255,20], Weigand, H. 1952 505-06 [255,2-255,11], Richter, W. 1959 371 [255,5-255,11], Birkhan, I. 1968 45 [255,5-255,6], Weigand, H. 1969c 110 [255,2-255,11], Burdach 1974 524 [254,17-255,20], 526 [255,5-255,11], Backes, S. 1999 46 [255,1-255,30], 47 [255,5-255,19] Bildungsroman: Gerhard 1926 20 Anm. 3 [255,5-255,6], Gerhard 1968 20 Anm. 3 [255,5-255,6] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 129 [255,2-255,20], Ringeler 2000 137 [255,2-255,20] Cundrie la surziere: Böhland 2001 53 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,30] Erzähltechnik: Harroff 1974 62 [255,1-255,30], Hirschberg 1976 27 Anm. 22 [255,5-255,19], 102 Anm. 36, 131 Anm. 36 [255,5-255,6], 131 [255,2-255,20], 134 [255,2-255,20], 135 [255,2-255,20], Parshall 1981 267 Anm. 57 [255,1-255,20], Green 1982b 203 Anm. 95 [255,5-255,19], 206 Anm. 105 [254,28-255,20], 212 [255,5-255,20], Northcott 1983 420 [255,5-255,7], Schu 2002 273 [255,5-255,6], Urscheler 2002 151 [254,28-255,19], 164 [255,2-255,20] Erziehung: Grosse 1962 65 [254,30-255,7] Fragen: Helm 1953 102 [254,30-255,19], Angress 1969 7 [255,5-255,7], Kordt 1997 227 [255,4-255,20], 228 [255,5-255,6], Gilmour 2000 185 [254,30-255,6] Frauen (allgemein): Sterling-Hellenbrand 1993 63 [255,4-255,20] Frauenfiguren: Breyer 1996 62 [255,2-255,30] Geographie: Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30] Gral: Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 268 [255,1-255,7], Burdach 1938 509 [255,4-255,6], Burdach 1974 509 [255,4-255,6] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 142 heterodoxe Einflüsse: Schröder, F. 1928 16 [255,2-255,6] Interpretation: Alker 1953 8 [255,1-255,6], Wynn 1962 156 Anm. 23, Bauer, G. 1963 80 [255,5-255,19], Johnson, S. 1970a 111 [255,2-256,9], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 262 [255,2-255,20], Wieners 1973 125 [254,30-255,19], 132 [255,5-255,6], Welz 1976 89 [255,2-255,9], Nagel, B. 1978 93 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Nagel, B. 1981b 126 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Johnson, L. 1982 95-96 [255,5-255,19], Wynn 1984 176 Anm. 93, Yeandle 1984 71 [255,1-255,20], Schweikle, G. 1986c 80 [255,5-255,6], Haferland 1988 198 [255,5-255,6], Bräuer 1990 285 [255,1-255,20], Steppich 1990 265 [255,1-255,20], 266 [255,5-255,11], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 105 [255,2-255,20], Steppich 1993 415 [255,6-255,7], Nellmann 1994c 650 [255,2-255,20], Roßnagel 1996 36 Anm. 70 [255,2-255,29], Kordt 1997 72 [255,5-255,11], Störmer-Caysa 1998b 34 [254,20-255,20], Backes, S. 1999 47-48 [255,5-255,7], Johnson, L. 1999 336 [255,2-255,20], 339 [255,2-255,20], Steppich 1999 63 [255,1-255,20], McFarland 2000 60 [255,1-255,30], Johnson, L. 2002 212 [255,5-255,19], Wynn 2002b 196 Anm. 17 Interpunktion: Backes, S. 1999 47-48 [255,5-255,7] Kommunikation: Godsall-Myers 2003b 96 [255,2-255,29], Schnyder, M. 2003 186 [255,5-255,7] Kyot: Lowet 1955 56 [255,4-255,11] Minne u. Ehe: Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20] Parenthese: Cucuel 1937 35 Philologie: Schröder, Werner 1975c 293 [255,5-255,6], Schröder, Werner 1989z 431 [255,5-255,6] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 62 [255,4-255,20], 73 [253,19-255,20], Junk 1912 157 [255,2-255,20], Burdach 1938 532 [254,15-255,20], Burdach 1974 532 [254,15-255,20] Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 178 [255,6-255,7], Rachbauer 1970 178 [255,6-255,7], Rachbauer 1980 178 [255,6-255,7], Nellmann 1996a 143 [255,5-255,11] Quellen - Keltisches: Ehrismann, G. 1905 50 [255,4-255,20], Nitze 1954a 237 [255,4-255,7], Nitze 1956 285 [255,4-255,7] Religion: San-Marte 1861 254 [255,1-255,30], Knorr 1934b 364 [255,1-255,20], Simson 1953 32 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Simson 1966 216 [255,2-255,20], Duckworth 1980 353 [255,5-255,7], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Zingerle, I. 1860 470 [255,1-255,20], Nyholm 1964 151 [255,1-257,30], Daiber 1999 195 Anm. 257 [255,2-255,20] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 111 [255,4-255,8] Ritterethik: Keferstein 1937a 55 Anm. 9 [255,2-255,30], Voß, R. 1998 33 [253,19-255,29] schame: Szövérffy 1976 95 [255,1-255,30], Szövérffy 1977b 43 [255,1-255,30] Schuld: Adolf 1950b 297 [255,2-255,20], Nagel, B. 1977 585 Anm. 3 [252,16-255,29], Kordt 1997 234 [255,5-255,6] Sigune: Heise 1957 45 [254,15-256,10], Niermann 1998 77 [255,2-255,29], 108-09 [255,2-255,20], Braunagel 1999 14 [255,2-255,16] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 88 [255,2-255,20], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kloocke, H. 1974 54 [255,2-255,6] Sünde: Helm 1953 101 [255,2-255,20] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 112 [255,2-255,7], 134 [255,2-255,20] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 115 [254,27-255,8] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 43 [255,2-255,16], Delabar 1990 259 [255,2-255,20] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Schirok 2002b 102 [255,5-255,6] Werkstruktur: Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29] Zauberei: Ernst 1995 123 [255,2-255,20] Zeitverhältnisse: Groos 1995 124 [255,5-255,19], 125 [255,5-255,6]
	[Zu 255, 7]