255,12 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 255,11]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 216 [255,1-255,29] Adaptation: Burdach 1938 524 [254,17-255,20], Mergell 1943 143 [255,1-255,20], 153 [255,5-255,20], 198 Anm. 108 [255,2-255,20], Burdach 1974 524 [254,17-255,20], Backes, S. 1999 46 [255,1-255,30], 47 [255,5-255,19] Blutstropfenepisode: Ehlert und Meissburger 1975 225 Anm. 234 [255,12-255,16] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 129 [255,2-255,20], Ringeler 2000 137 [255,2-255,20] Cundrie la surziere: Böhland 2001 53 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,30] Erzähltechnik: Lichtenstein 1897 81, Harroff 1974 62 [255,1-255,30], Hirschberg 1976 27 Anm. 22 [255,5-255,19], 131 [255,2-255,20], 134 [255,2-255,20], 135 [255,2-255,20], Parshall 1981 267 Anm. 57 [255,1-255,20], Green 1982b 203 Anm. 95 [255,5-255,19], 206 Anm. 105 [254,28-255,20], 212 [255,5-255,20], 288 Anm. 141 [255,12-255,20], Urscheler 2002 151 [254,28-255,19], 164 [255,2-255,20] Fragen: Helm 1953 102 [254,30-255,19], Kordt 1997 227 [255,4-255,20] Frauen (allgemein): Sterling-Hellenbrand 1993 63 [255,4-255,20] Frauenfiguren: Breyer 1996 62 [255,2-255,30] Geographie: Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Schröder, F. 1928 16-17 [255,12-255,20] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 972 [255,12-255,20], Bauer, G. 1963 80 [255,5-255,19], Johnson, S. 1970a 111 [255,2-256,9], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 262 [255,2-255,20], Wieners 1973 125 [254,30-255,19], Hahn, I. 1975 224 [255,12-255,17], Nagel, B. 1978 93 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Nagel, B. 1981b 126 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Johnson, L. 1982 95-96 [255,5-255,19], Yeandle 1984 71 [255,1-255,20], Lampe 1987b 273 [255,12-255,17], Haferland 1988 324 Anm. 154 [255,12-255,20], Bräuer 1990 285 [255,1-255,20], Hasty 1990 62 [255,12-255,27], Steppich 1990 265 [255,1-255,20], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 105 [255,2-255,20], Nellmann 1994c 650 [255,2-255,20], Roßnagel 1996 36 Anm. 70 [255,2-255,29], Störmer-Caysa 1998b 34 [254,20-255,20], Johnson, L. 1999 336 [255,2-255,20], 339 [255,2-255,20], Steppich 1999 63 [255,1-255,20], Drecoll 2000 283 Anm. 17 [255,12-255,14], McFarland 2000 60 [255,1-255,30], Johnson, L. 2002 212 [255,5-255,19] Kommunikation: Godsall-Myers 2003b 96 [255,2-255,29] Minne u. Ehe: Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 62 [255,4-255,20], 73 [253,19-255,20], Junk 1912 157 [255,2-255,20], Golther 1925a 162 [255,12-255,20], Burdach 1938 532 [254,15-255,20], Burdach 1974 532 [254,15-255,20] Quellen - Keltisches: Ehrismann, G. 1905 50 [255,4-255,20] Religion: San-Marte 1861 254 [255,1-255,30], Knorr 1934b 364 [255,1-255,20], Simson 1953 32 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Simson 1966 216 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Zingerle, I. 1860 470 [255,1-255,20], Nyholm 1964 151 [255,1-257,30], Daiber 1999 195 Anm. 257 [255,2-255,20] Richtungskonstruktionen: Wießner 1901 550 Ritterethik: Keferstein 1937a 55 Anm. 9 [255,2-255,30], Voß, R. 1998 33 [253,19-255,29] schame: Szövérffy 1976 95 [255,1-255,30], Szövérffy 1977b 43 [255,1-255,30] Schuld: Adolf 1950b 297 [255,2-255,20], Nagel, B. 1977 585 Anm. 3 [252,16-255,29], Hasty 1988 361 [255,12-255,27] Sigune: Heise 1957 45 [254,15-256,10], Niermann 1998 77 [255,2-255,29], 108-09 [255,2-255,20], Braunagel 1999 14 [255,2-255,16], 17 Sprache: Beck, Hartmut 1994 71 Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 88 [255,2-255,20], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 190 [255,12-255,16] Sünde: Helm 1953 101 [255,2-255,20] Syntax: Horacek 1964 232, 236 tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 112 [255,12-255,13], 134 [255,2-255,20] Überlieferung: Hofstätter 1951 78 <, Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 128 < Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 43 [255,2-255,16], Delabar 1990 259 [255,2-255,20] Werkstruktur: Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29] Zauberei: Ernst 1995 123 [255,2-255,20] Zeitverhältnisse: Groos 1995 124 [255,5-255,19]
	[Zu 255,13]