255,14 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 255,13]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 216 [255,1-255,29] Adaptation: Kellermann, W. 1936 105 [255,14-255,16], Burdach 1938 524 [254,17-255,20], Mergell 1943 143 [255,1-255,20], 153 [255,5-255,20], 154 [255,13-255,20], 198 Anm. 108 [255,2-255,20], Richey 1957d 62 [255,13-255,16], Birkhan, I. 1968 45 [255,14-255,19], Burdach 1974 524 [254,17-255,20], Backes, S. 1999 46 [255,1-255,30], 47 [255,5-255,19] Blutstropfenepisode: Ehlert und Meissburger 1975 225 Anm. 234 [255,12-255,16] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 179 [255,14-255,20], 347 [255,13-255,20], 352 [255,14-255,16], Ortmann 1972 129 [255,2-255,20], Ringeler 2000 137 [255,2-255,20] Cundrie la surziere: Böhland 2001 53 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Schreiber, A. 1922 196, Richey 1923b 74 Anm. 63 [255,14-255,16], Cucuel 1937 6 Anm. 2 [255,14-255,16] Erzähltechnik: Harroff 1974 62 [255,1-255,30], Hirschberg 1976 27 Anm. 22 [255,5-255,19], 102 Anm. 36, 131 [255,2-255,20], 134 [255,2-255,20], 135 [255,2-255,20], Schirok 1976 60 [255,14-255,17], Parshall 1981 267 Anm. 57 [255,1-255,20], Green 1982b 203 Anm. 95 [255,5-255,19], 206 Anm. 105 [254,28-255,20], 212 [255,5-255,20], 288 Anm. 141 [255,12-255,20], Schu 2002 274 [255,14-255,16], 380 Anm. 166 [255,13-255,16], 392 Anm. 207 [255,13-255,20], Urscheler 2002 151 [254,28-255,19], 164 [255,2-255,20] Fiktionalität: Grünkorn 1994 161 [255,13-255,29] Fragen: Helm 1953 102 [254,30-255,19], Angress 1969 7 [255,14-255,16], Bertau 1994 13 [255,14-255,17], Bertau 1996a 97, 99 [255,14-255,17], Kordt 1997 227 [255,4-255,20] Frauen (allgemein): Sterling-Hellenbrand 1993 63 [255,4-255,20] Frauenfiguren: Breyer 1996 62 [255,2-255,30] Geographie: Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30] Gral: Loomis 1963b 205 Anm. 3 [255,13-255,19], Loomis 1991 205 Anm. 3 [255,13-255,19] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 57 güete: Meissburger 1968 173 Anm. 100 [255,13-255,25] Handschriftliches: Backes, S. 1999 50 Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 220 [255,13-255,20] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Schröder, F. 1928 16-17 [255,12-255,20] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 972 [255,12-255,20], Weber, G. 1948 44 [255,13-255,16], Zeydel und Morgan 1951 351, Bauer, G. 1963 80 [255,5-255,19], Johnson, L. 1967 78 [255,14-255,16], Groos 1968 643 [255,14-255,16], Johnson, S. 1970a 111 [255,2-256,9], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Poag 1972a 81-82 [255,14-255,17], Kratz, H. 1973a 262 [255,2-255,20], Wieners 1973 125 [254,30-255,19], Poag 1974a 277 [255,13-255,16], Hahn, I. 1975 224 [255,12-255,17], Nagel, B. 1978 93 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Bertau 1980 24, Huber, H. 1981 204 [255,13-255,20], Nagel, B. 1981b 126 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Johnson, L. 1982 95-96 [255,5-255,19], Bertau 1983h 172, Wynn 1984 219 [255,14-255,16], Yeandle 1984 71 [255,1-255,20], McConnell 1985a 449, Lampe 1987b 273 [255,12-255,17], Haferland 1988 324 Anm. 154 [255,12-255,20], Bräuer 1990 285 [255,1-255,20], Hasty 1990 62 [255,12-255,27], Steppich 1990 265 [255,1-255,20], 283 [255,13-255,20], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 105 [255,2-255,20], Steppich 1993 400 [255,13-255,20], Nellmann 1994c 618 [255,14-255,19], 650 [255,2-255,20], Roßnagel 1996 36 Anm. 70 [255,2-255,29], Störmer-Caysa 1998b 34 [254,20-255,20], Backes, S. 1999 50, 176 [255,13-255,20], Johnson, L. 1999 336 [255,2-255,20], 339 [255,2-255,20], Steppich 1999 63 [255,1-255,20], Drecoll 2000 283 Anm. 17 [255,12-255,14], McFarland 2000 60 [255,1-255,30], Bumke 2001a 72 [255,13-255,20], Johnson, L. 2002 212 [255,5-255,19], Williams-Krapp 2003 33 [255,13-255,20] Kommunikation: Godsall-Myers 2003b 96 [255,2-255,29] Leitmotive: Rupp, H. 1985 92 [255,13-255,14] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Mieder 2004 234 [255,13-255,20] Minne u. Ehe: Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20] Naturwissenschaft: Nellmann 1994c 595 Oxymoron: Freytag, W. 1972a 36 Anm. 8 [255,14-255,20], 75 [255,14-255,16] Psychologie: Endres 1978 381 [255,13-255,16] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 62 [255,4-255,20], 73 [253,19-255,20], Junk 1912 157 [255,2-255,20], Golther 1925a 162 [255,12-255,20], Burdach 1938 532 [254,15-255,20], Burdach 1974 532 [254,15-255,20] Quellen - Keltisches: Ehrismann, G. 1905 50 [255,4-255,20] Religion: San-Marte 1861 75 [255,13-255,16], 254 [255,1-255,30], Knorr 1934b 364 [255,1-255,20], Simson 1953 32 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Simson 1966 216 [255,2-255,20], Groos 1975a 60 [255,14-255,16], Duckworth 1980 90 [255,14-255,16], 94 [255,14-255,16], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Bumke 2004 133 [255,13-255,20] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Zingerle, I. 1860 470 [255,1-255,20], Nyholm 1964 151 [255,1-257,30], Daiber 1999 195 Anm. 257 [255,2-255,20] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 156 [255,14-255,17] Ritterethik: Keferstein 1937a 55 Anm. 9 [255,2-255,30], Voß, R. 1998 33 [253,19-255,29] schame: Szövérffy 1976 95 [255,1-255,30], Szövérffy 1977b 43 [255,1-255,30], Marchand 1983a 288 [255,13-255,27] Schönheit: Backes, S. 1999 54 [255,13-255,20] Schuld: Adolf 1950b 297 [255,2-255,20], Heuberger 1961 195 [255,13-255,20], Nagel, B. 1977 585 Anm. 3 [252,16-255,29], Hasty 1988 361 [255,12-255,27], Birkhan, H. 2003b 136 [255,13-255,20] Sigune: Heise 1957 45 [254,15-256,10], 49 [255,13-255,14], Gibbs 1972 43 [255,14-255,16], Jost, D. 1977 33 [255,14-255,15], Niermann 1998 77 [255,2-255,29], 108-09 [255,2-255,20], Braunagel 1999 14 [255,2-255,16], 17 Sprichwörter u. Sentenzen: Joos und Whitesell 1951 119, Mieder 2004 261 [255,14-255,15] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 88 [255,2-255,20], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 81 [255,13-255,16], 190 [255,12-255,16], 208 Anm. 12 [255,14-255,16] Suche: Wilson 1988 160 [255,14-255,16], 165 [255,13-255,16] Sünde: Helm 1953 101 [255,2-255,20] Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Lewis 1974 93, Backes, S. 1999 50 triuwe: San-Marte 1861 163 [255,14-255,16], Kratz, H. 1973a 77 [255,14-255,17], Wieners 1973 55 [255,14-255,16], Schwab 1989b 109 [255,14-255,15], Backes, S. 1999 6 [255,14-255,20], Gibbs 1999 15 [255,14-255,16] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 134 [255,2-255,20] Überlieferung: Kühnel 1972 168 [255,14-255,16] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 43 [255,2-255,16], Delabar 1990 259 [255,2-255,20] Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Lowet 1955 123 [255,14-255,17] Wagner, Richard: Salvan-Renucci 1994 252 [255,13-255,20] Werkstruktur: Henzen 1951 215 [255,14-255,20], Henzen 1966 154 [255,14-255,20], Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29] Wortschatz: Backes, S. 1999 50 Wortsinn: Joos und Whitesell 1951 119 Zauberei: Ernst 1995 123 [255,2-255,20], Maksymiuk 1996 104 Anm. 1 [255,13-255,16] Zeitverhältnisse: Groos 1995 124 [255,5-255,19]
	[Zu 255,15]