255,17 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben) | [Zu 255,16] |
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 216 [255,1-255,29]
Adaptation: Hilka 1932 696 [255,17-255,19], Kellermann, W. 1936 103 [255,17-255,19], Burdach 1938 524 [254,17-255,20], Stockum 1941 19 [255,17-255,19], Mergell 1943 143 [255,1-255,20], 153 [255,5-255,20], 154 [255,13-255,20], 198 Anm. 108 [255,2-255,20], Birkhan, I. 1968 45 [255,14-255,19], Burdach 1974 524 [254,17-255,20], Kordt 1997 135 [255,17-255,19], Backes, S. 1999 46 [255,1-255,30], 47 [255,5-255,19] Anfortas: Schrodt 1976 616 [255,17-255,19] Bildungsroman: Gerhard 1926 20 Anm. 2 [255,17-255,18], Gerhard 1968 20 Anm. 2 [255,17-255,18] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 179 [255,14-255,20], 181, 267 Anm. 1, 304, 347 [255,13-255,20], Ortmann 1972 129 [255,2-255,20], Ringeler 2000 137 [255,2-255,20] Cundrie la surziere: Böhland 2001 53 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,30] erbarme: Schwab 1989b 108, Störmer-Caysa 2002 86, Müller, M. 2003 153 Erzähltechnik: Lichtenstein 1897 81 [255,17-255,20], Harroff 1974 62 [255,1-255,30], Hirschberg 1976 19, 27 Anm. 22 [255,5-255,19], 102 Anm. 36, 131 [255,2-255,20], 132 [255,17-255,19], 134 [255,2-255,20], 135 [255,2-255,20], Schirok 1976 60 [255,14-255,17], Parshall 1981 267 Anm. 57 [255,1-255,20], Green 1982b 203 Anm. 95 [255,5-255,19], 206 Anm. 105 [254,28-255,20], 212 Anm. 130, 212 [255,5-255,20], 288 Anm. 141 [255,12-255,20], 294 Anm. 168, Schu 2002 273 [255,17-255,19], 392 Anm. 207 [255,13-255,20], Urscheler 2002 151 [254,28-255,19], 164 [255,2-255,20] Erziehung: Grosse 1962 64 [255,17-255,20] Fiktionalität: Grünkorn 1994 161 [255,13-255,29] Fragen: Helm 1953 102 [254,30-255,19], Angress 1969 7 [255,17-255,19], Bertau 1994 13 [255,14-255,17], Bertau 1996a 99 [255,14-255,17], Kordt 1997 227 [255,4-255,20], 228, Auteri 2003 65 Frauen (allgemein): Sterling-Hellenbrand 1993 63 [255,4-255,20] Frauenfiguren: Breyer 1996 62 [255,2-255,30] Gattung: Knapp, F. 1996a 63 Anm. 29 [255,17-255,19], Knapp, F. 1997c 146 Anm. 29 [255,17-255,19] Geographie: Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30] Gral: Burdach 1938 509, Kiene 1944 9, Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 47, Loomis 1963b 205 Anm. 3 [255,13-255,19], Burdach 1974 509, Loomis 1991 205 Anm. 3 [255,13-255,19] Grammatik: Gilmour 2000 169 güete: Meissburger 1968 167 Anm. 55 [255,17-255,20], 173 Anm. 100 [255,13-255,25] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 220 [255,13-255,20], 228 [255,16-255,20] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Schröder, F. 1928 16-17 [255,12-255,20], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 44 [255,17-255,19] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 972 [255,12-255,20], Weber, G. 1948 44 [255,17-255,19], Heer 1952 357, Alker 1953 8 [255,17-255,20], Springer 1959 232, Bauer, G. 1963 80 [255,5-255,19], Johnson, S. 1970a 111 [255,2-256,9], Schröder, Werner 1971a 125 [255,17-255,20], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Poag 1972a 49 [255,17-255,20], 81-82 [255,14-255,17], Roßkopf 1972 274 [255,17-255,19], Kratz, H. 1973a 262 [255,2-255,20], Wieners 1973 125 [254,30-255,19], 191 Anm. 381, Schmidt, J. 1974 375 [255,17-255,20], Hahn, I. 1975 224 [255,12-255,17], Springer 1975b 194, Nagel, B. 1978 93 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Green 1980a 359, Ruh 1980 130, Huber, H. 1981 204 [255,13-255,20], Nagel, B. 1981b 126 Anm. 103 [255,2-255,20], Green 1982a 70, Johnson, L. 1982 95-96 [255,5-255,19], 97 [255,17-255,18], Brall 1983b 254 [255,15-255,17], Yeandle 1984 71 [255,1-255,20], Schweikle, G. 1986c 80, Lampe 1987b 273 [255,12-255,17], Haferland 1988 198, 324 Anm. 154 [255,12-255,20], Huby, Michel 1989 263 Anm. 33, Schröder, Werner 1989q 234 [255,17-255,20], Bräuer 1990 285 [255,1-255,20], Hasty 1990 62 [255,12-255,27], Steppich 1990 265 [255,1-255,20], 283 [255,13-255,20], Bumke 1991d 130, Liebertz-Grün 1993a 105 [255,2-255,20], Steppich 1993 400 [255,13-255,20], 407 [255,17-255,19], Nellmann 1994c 618 [255,14-255,19], 650 [255,2-255,20], Roßnagel 1996 36 Anm. 70 [255,2-255,29], 50 Anm. 142 [255,17-255,19], Kordt 1997 136, 137, 149, Störmer-Caysa 1998b 34 [254,20-255,20], Backes, S. 1999 48, 68, 176 [255,13-255,20], Johnson, L. 1999 336 [255,2-255,20], 339 [255,2-255,20], Steppich 1999 63 [255,1-255,20], Gilmour 2000 166, McFarland 2000 60 [255,1-255,30], Bumke 2001a 72 [255,13-255,20], Johnson, L. 2002 212 [255,5-255,19], 214 [255,17-255,18], Williams-Krapp 2003 33 [255,13-255,20] Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 228 Anm. 944 [255,17-255,20] Kommunikation: Godsall-Myers 2003b 96 [255,2-255,29] Memoria: Remscheid 1999 146, 162 [255,17-255,19] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Mieder 2004 234 [255,13-255,20] Minne u. Ehe: Horacek 1991 367, Emmerling 2003 305 [255,2-255,20] Oxymoron: Freytag, W. 1972a 36 Anm. 8 [255,14-255,20], 76 Anm. 18, 123 Anm. 30 [255,15-255,20] Pädagogik: Ludwig, E. 1953 66, Essen 1967 127 [255,17-255,19] Philologie: Schröder, Werner 1975c 293 [255,17-255,18], Schröder, Werner 1989z 431 [255,17-255,18] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 36 [255,17-255,19], 62 [255,4-255,20], 73 [253,19-255,20], Junk 1912 157 [255,2-255,20], Golther 1925a 162 [255,12-255,20], Bruce, James Douglas 1928a 338, Burdach 1938 532 [254,15-255,20], Bruce, James Douglas 1958a 338, Burdach 1974 532 [254,15-255,20] Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 178 [255,17-255,19], Rachbauer 1970 178 [255,17-255,19], Rachbauer 1980 178 [255,17-255,19] Quellen - Keltisches: Ehrismann, G. 1905 50 [255,4-255,20], Nitze 1954a 238 [255,17-255,20], Nitze 1956 285 [255,17-255,20] Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Sivertson 1999a 216 [255,17-255,19] Religion: San-Marte 1861 254 [255,1-255,30], Lichtenstein 1897 66, Knorr 1934b 364 [255,1-255,20], Simson 1953 32 [255,2-255,20], Wapnewski 1955 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Wolff, L. 1955 265 [255,17-255,20], Simson 1966 216 [255,2-255,20], Wolff, L. 1967c 204 [255,17-255,20], Duckworth 1980 94 [255,17-255,19], Wapnewski 1982 157 Anm. 21 [255,2-255,20], Bumke 1997a 104, Bumke 2004 133 [255,13-255,20] Rezeption (primär): Green 1994a 417 Anm. 336 [255,17-255,19] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Zingerle, I. 1860 470 [255,1-255,20], Nyholm 1964 151 [255,1-257,30], Schmid, E. 1994 287 Anm. 27 [255,17-255,19], Daiber 1999 195 Anm. 257 [255,2-255,20] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 46 [255,15-255,19], 156 [255,14-255,17] Rhetorik: Schröder, Werner 1961a 86 [255,17-255,20], Schröder, Werner 1989t 283 [255,17-255,20] Ritterethik: Keferstein 1937a 55 Anm. 9 [255,2-255,30], 56 Anm. 1 [255,17-255,19], Voß, R. 1998 33 [253,19-255,29] schame: Szövérffy 1976 95 [255,1-255,30], Szövérffy 1977b 43 [255,1-255,30], Marchand 1983a 288 [255,13-255,27] Schönheit: Backes, S. 1999 54 [255,13-255,20] Schuld: Adolf 1950b 297 [255,2-255,20], Schröder, F. 1959 4, Heuberger 1961 195 [255,13-255,20], Schröder, F. 1966 346, Nagel, B. 1977 585 Anm. 3 [252,16-255,29], Hasty 1988 361 [255,12-255,27], Kordt 1997 229, Birkhan, H. 2003b 136 [255,13-255,20] Sigune: Heise 1957 45 [254,15-256,10], Niermann 1998 77 [255,2-255,29], 108-09 [255,2-255,20], Braunagel 1999 14 [255,17-255,20], 17 Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 88 [255,2-255,20], Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 190 [255,17-255,19] Sünde: Helm 1953 101 [255,2-255,20], Sacker 1963 54 [255,17-255,19], Bumke 2004 129 Syntax: Mourek 1911 3, 16 [255,17-255,18], Horacek 1968 73 [255,17-255,19] Tafelrunde: Emmel 1951 120 Traummotivik: Fischer, S. 1978 126 [255,17-255,20] triuwe: Emmel 1936 48, Kratz, H. 1973a 77 [255,14-255,17], Emmel 1980 48, Backes, S. 1999 6 [255,14-255,20] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 113 [255,17-255,20], 134 [255,2-255,20] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 43 [255,17-255,20], Delabar 1990 259 [255,2-255,20] Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Lowet 1955 123 [255,14-255,17] Wagner, Richard: Salvan-Renucci 1994 252 [255,13-255,20] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Schirok 2002b 102 Werkstruktur: Henzen 1951 215 [255,14-255,20], Henzen 1966 154 [255,14-255,20], Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29] Wildheit: Hufeland 1976 13 [255,17-255,20] Zauberei: Ernst 1995 123 [255,2-255,20] Zeitverhältnisse: Groos 1995 124 [255,5-255,19] | |
[Zu 255,18] |