255,26 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 255,25]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 113 [255,25-256,4], 216 [255,1-255,29] Adaptation: Mergell 1943 154 [255,25-255,30], Backes, S. 1999 46 [255,1-255,30] Artusepik: Roßnagel 1996 135 [255,26-255,27] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 171 [255,26-255,27], 304 [255,26-255,27], Ortmann 1972 129 [255,24-255,29] Cundrie la surziere: Böhland 2001 53 Anm. 38 [255,2-255,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Schreiber, A. 1922 196 [255,26-255,27] erbarme: Müller, M. 2003 153 [255,25-255,27] Erzähltechnik: Harroff 1974 62 [255,1-255,30], Hirschberg 1976 300 [255,26-255,27], Parshall 1981 113 [255,26-255,27], Urscheler 2002 164 [255,24-255,29] ethischer Wortschatz: Heckel, H. 1939 103 zitiert als 255, 7 [255,26-255,27], Maurer 1951b 278 [255,26-255,27] Fiktionalität: Grünkorn 1994 161 [255,13-255,29] Frauenfiguren: Breyer 1996 62 [255,2-255,30] Geographie: Wynn 1961a 42 [255,25-255,27], Passage 1984 216 [255,1-255,30], Wynn 1984 156 [255,25-255,27], Classen 2000j 60 Gral: Burdach 1938 509 [255,26-255,27], Burdach 1974 509 [255,26-255,27], Dewald 1975 143 [255,21-255,30] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 262 [255,25-255,29] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Schröder, F. 1928 17 [255,26-255,27] Individualität: Sosna 2003 186 [255,25-255,29] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 827 [255,25-255,29], Weber, G. 1948 44 [255,21-255,30], Johnson, L. 1967 78 [255,26-255,27], Johnson, S. 1970a 111 [255,2-256,9], Kashiwagi 1970 6 [255,25-255,29], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 263 [255,21-256,4], Wieners 1973 103 [255,24-255,29], 129 [255,26-255,27], Schmidt, J. 1974 376 [255,26-255,27], Dewald 1975 258 [255,22-255,29], Nagel, B. 1978 93 Anm. 103 [255,24-255,29], Brackert 1979 166 [255,26-255,27], Nagel, B. 1981b 126 Anm. 103 [255,24-255,29], Hasty 1990 62 [255,12-255,27], Pratelidis 1994 213 [255,25-255,27], Roßnagel 1996 36 Anm. 70 [255,2-255,29], Gibbs und Johnson, S. 1997 182 [255,24-255,29], Kordt 1997 148 [255,25-256,4], Garnerus 1999 150 [255,23-256,4], Steppich 1999 63 [255,25-255,27], McFarland 2000 60 [255,1-255,30], Shockey 2002 87 [255,25-255,27], Williams-Krapp 2003 33 [255,26-255,27] Jungfräulichkeit: Müller, Maria E 1995 211 [255,26-255,27] Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 269 [255,24-255,29], Godsall-Myers 2003b 96 [255,2-255,29] Memoria: Remscheid 1999 174 [255,25-255,27] Minne u. Ehe: Willson, H. 1968 192 [255,25-255,27], Kleber, J. 1992b 261 [255,24-255,30] Oxymoron: Freytag, W. 1972a 58 Anm. 43 [255,25-255,29] Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 34 [255,21-255,29] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 38 [255,21-255,29], Rachbauer 1934 157 [255,21-256,10], Rachbauer 1970 157 [255,21-256,10], Rachbauer 1980 157 [255,21-256,10] Religion: San-Marte 1861 254 [255,1-255,30], Duckworth 1980 134 [255,25-255,29], 217 [255,25-255,27], Bayer, Hans 1983 199 Anm. 505 [255,26-255,29] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 151 [255,1-257,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wasielewski-Knecht 1993 128 [255,25-255,29] Ritterethik: Keferstein 1937a 55 Anm. 9 [255,2-255,30], Christoph 1982 33 [255,26-255,27], Voß, R. 1998 33 [253,19-255,29] Rittertum: Sacker 1963 30 [255,26-255,27] schame: Szövérffy 1976 95 [255,1-255,30], Szövérffy 1977b 43 [255,1-255,30], Marchand 1983a 288 [255,13-255,27] Schuld: Schröder, F. 1959 2 [255,26-255,27], Schröder, F. 1966 342 [255,26-255,27], Nagel, B. 1977 585 Anm. 3 [252,16-255,29], Hasty 1988 361 [255,12-255,27], Kordt 1997 229 [255,25-256,6] Sigune: Gibbs 1967/68 300 [255,24-255,29], Heise 1957 45 [254,15-256,10], Gibbs 1972 42 [255,24-255,29], Niermann 1998 77 [255,2-255,29], 109 [255,25-255,29], Braunagel 1999 10 [255,21-255,29], 14 [255,24-255,30], 17, Braunagel 2001 82 [255,21-255,30] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 387 [255,1-255,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 144 [255,21-255,26] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Schirok 2002b 109 [255,25-255,27] Werkstruktur: Sauer, M. 1981 264 Anm. 1 [255,2-255,29] Wildenberg: Schreiber, A. 1922 40 Anm. 8
	[Zu 255,27]