264,10 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 264, 9]
Adaptation: Kellermann, W. 1936 158 [264,1-264,19], Backes, S. 1999 73 [264,1-264,25], 93-94 [264,1-264,19], Bumke 2004 62 [264,1-264,19]
Chaostheorie: Grein Gamra 1999 168 Anm. 1 [264,1-264,20]
Charakterisierung: Backes, S. 1999 74 [264,1-264,25]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Schreiber, A. 1922 140 [264,1-264,19], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 64 [264,1-264,19], Boigs 1987 375 [264,1-264,30]
Erzähltechnik: Salmon, Paul 1960 109 [264,1-264,30], 110 [264,1-264,30], Nellmann 1973a 134 Anm. 26 [264,1-264,30], Hirschberg 1976 16 [264,1-264,19], 21 [263,1-265,9], Green 1978c 142 [262,1-265,19], Parshall 1981 54 [264,1-264,19], 63 [264,1-264,19], Stein, A. 1993 86 [264,6-264,19], Schu 2002 231 [262,14-264,25]
französischer Wortschatz: Wiener 1895 333, Suolahti 1933 294, Backes, S. 1999 96-97
Gebärde u. Geste: Peil 1975 173 Anm. 59 [264,6-264,10]
Gral: Kiene 1944 15 [264,1-264,19]
Hartmann von Aue: Wand 1989 139, 169, 174, Backes, S. 1999 93-94 [264,1-264,19], 96-97
Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 828 [264,1-264,30], Bumke 1970a 299 [264,1-264,30], Huth 1972 17 [264,2-264,24], 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 302 [264,1-264,30], Yeandle 1984 350, Nellmann 1994c 598 [264,1-264,11], [264,1-264,22], 633 [264,1-264,30], Backes, S. 1999 93-94 [264,1-264,19], 96-97, 99 [264,4-264,19], 120, Garnerus 1999 232 Anm. 89 [264,1-264,19]
Jeschute: Gibbs 1972 106 [264,1-264,11]
Juristisches: Bostock 1952b 34-35 [264,1-264,30], Backes, S. 1999 93 [264,4-264,19], 93-94 [264,1-264,19], 96-97
kiusche: San-Marte 1861 184 [264,8-264,10], Kinzel 1886a 457 [264,6-264,10]
Minne u. Ehe: Naumann, H. 1929a 27, Schumacher, Marlis 1967 109, Ernst 1998 218 [264,6-264,11], 232 Anm. 46 [264,2-264,19], Backes, S. 1999 93-94 [264,1-264,19], 96-97
Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 40 [264,1-264,19], Rachbauer 1934 184 [264,1-264,11], 187 [264,6-264,11], 188 [264,4-264,19], Fourquet 1938b 125-28 [262,19-265,4], Fourquet 1966b 98-100 [262,19-265,4], Bumke 1970a 236 [263,1-264,30], Rachbauer 1970 184 [264,1-264,11], 187 [264,6-264,11], 188 [264,4-264,19], Heinzle 1975 32 [263,1-264,30], Rachbauer 1980 184 [264,1-264,11], 187 [264,6-264,11], 188 [264,4-264,19]
Religion: Mockenhaupt 1942 168, Mockenhaupt 1968 168, Thelen 1989 660 [264,1-264,11]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Jürgens-Lochthove 1980 148 [262,23-264,22]
Rittertum: Clifton-Everest 1990 310 Anm. 22 [264,1-264,19]
Schuld: Wieners 1973 6 [264,6-264,10]
Soziologie: Margetts 2002 536 [264,1-264,19]
Sprache: Ide 1996 238 [264,6-264,15]
Stil: Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18]
Symbolismus: Naumann, H. 1932 298
Syntax: Wahnschaffe 1919 104 [264,8-264,10]
Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 110 [261,21-264,27]
Vergewaltigung: Buschinger 1984a 374 [264,2-264,10]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 284 Anm. 24 [264,1-264,19], Backes, S. 1999 93-94 [264,1-264,19]
Wolfram - Biographie: Lichtenstein 1897 62 [262,20-265,17]
 [Zu 264,11]