264,18 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 264,17]
Adaptation: Kellermann, W. 1936 158 [264,1-264,19], Backes, S. 1999 73 [264,1-264,25], 93-94 [264,1-264,19], Bumke 2004 62 [264,1-264,19] Chaostheorie: Grein Gamra 1999 168 Anm. 1 [264,1-264,20] Charakterisierung: Backes, S. 1999 74 [264,1-264,25] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Schreiber, A. 1922 140 [264,1-264,19], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 64 [264,1-264,19], Boigs 1987 375 [264,1-264,30] Erzähltechnik: Salmon, Paul 1960 109 [264,1-264,30], 110 [264,1-264,30], Nellmann 1973a 134 Anm. 26 [264,1-264,30], Hirschberg 1976 16 [264,1-264,19], 21 [263,1-265,9], Green 1978c 142 [262,1-265,19], Parshall 1981 54 [264,1-264,19], 63 [264,1-264,19], Stein, A. 1993 86 [264,6-264,19], Schu 2002 231 [262,14-264,25] Gewalt: Lienert 2002a 229 [264,16-264,19], 230 Gral: Kiene 1944 15 [264,1-264,19] Handschriftliches: Backes, S. 1999 98-99 [264,18-264,19] Hartmann von Aue: Backes, S. 1999 93-94 [264,1-264,19] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 828 [264,1-264,30], Gehrts 1960 299 [264,16-264,19], Okken 1968 637 [264,16-264,19], Bumke 1970a 299 [264,1-264,30], Huth 1972 17 [264,2-264,24], 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 302 [264,1-264,30], Yeandle 1984 397 [264,16-264,19], 406 [264,16-264,19], Bumke 1991d 75 [264,18-264,19], Nellmann 1994c 598 [264,1-264,22], 599 [264,18-264,19], 633 [264,1-264,30], Bumke 1997a 55 [264,18-264,19], Backes, S. 1999 93-94 [264,1-264,19], 98-99 [264,18-264,19], 99 [264,4-264,19], Garnerus 1999 232 Anm. 89 [264,1-264,19], Bumke 2004 69 [264,18-264,19] Interpunktion: Backes, S. 1999 98-99 [264,18-264,19] Jeschute: San-Marte 1862b 32 [264,16-264,19], Braunagel 2001 101 Anm. 188 [264,16-264,19] Juristisches: Bostock 1952b 34-35 [264,1-264,30], Yeandle 1984 396 [264,16-264,19], 406 [264,16-264,19], Nellmann 1994c 598 [264,16-264,19], Backes, S. 1999 93 [264,4-264,19], 93-94 [264,1-264,19], 98-99 [264,18-264,19] Minne u. Ehe: Schumacher, Marlis 1967 92 [264,16-264,19], 109 [264,16-264,19], Faber 1973 288 Anm. 101 [264,16-264,19], Speckner 1995 156 [264,16-264,19], Ernst 1998 232 Anm. 46 [264,2-264,19], Backes, S. 1999 93-94 [264,1-264,19], Schultz, J. 2002a 354 [264,14-264,19], Emmerling 2003 269 [264,16-264,19] Philologie: Schmidt, E. 1979 482 Psychologie: Meyer zur Capellen 1993 120 [264,16-264,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 40 [264,1-264,19], Rachbauer 1934 188 [264,4-264,19], Fourquet 1938b 125-28 [262,19-265,4], Fourquet 1966b 98-100 [262,19-265,4], Bumke 1970a 236 [263,1-264,30], Rachbauer 1970 188 [264,4-264,19], Heinzle 1975 32 [263,1-264,30], Rachbauer 1980 188 [264,4-264,19] Religion: San-Marte 1861 134 [264,11-264,19], Mockenhaupt 1942 168 [264,18-264,19], Mockenhaupt 1968 168 [264,18-264,19] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Jürgens-Lochthove 1980 148 [262,23-264,22] Ritterethik: Raucheisen 1997 87 Anm. 383 [264,18-264,19] Rittertum: Clifton-Everest 1990 310 Anm. 22 [264,1-264,19] Soziologie: Margetts 2002 536 [264,1-264,19] Sprache: Bötticher 1876 294 [264,16-264,21] Stil: Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Syntax: Mourek 1911 27 [264,18-264,19] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 110 [261,21-264,27] Übersetzungsproblematik: Backes, S. 1999 98-99 [264,18-264,19] Vergewaltigung: Buschinger 1984a 374 [264,18-264,19] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 284 Anm. 24 [264,1-264,19], Backes, S. 1999 93-94 [264,1-264,19] Wolfram - Biographie: Lichtenstein 1897 62 [262,20-265,17] Wortsinn: Backes, S. 1999 98-99 [264,18-264,19], Gilmour 2000 286 [264,18-264,19]
	[Zu 264,19]