269,12 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 269,11]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 115 [269,1-270,4] Adaptation: Hilka 1932 705 [268,25-270,4], 735 [268,25-270,4], Mergell 1943 85 [269,1-270,4], Backes, S. 1999 111 [268,25-271,24] Artus: Schirok 1989c 79 [268,25-271,13] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 33 [269,1-270,4], 127 [269,12-270,4], 129 [269,4-270,4] Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 23 [268,25-270,4], 222 [269,4-270,4], Schu 2002 232 [268,25-270,4], Urscheler 2002 98 [269,7-271,23] Frauen (allgemein): Rinn 1996 139 [269,12-269,30] Gebärde u. Geste: Peil 1975 207 [269,1-270,4] Gewalt: Lienert 2002a 235 [269,1-270,4] Gral: Burdach 1938 514 [268,25-270,4], Burdach 1974 514 [268,25-270,4] Grammatik: Gilmour 2000 206 [269,12-269,13] Hartmann von Aue: Wand 1989 263 Anm. 609 [269,4-269,14] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 236 [269,4-269,14] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 328 [269,1-269,30] Individualität: Sosna 2003 187 [268,25-271,13], 188 [269,4-269,14] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 44 [268,25-271,22], 48 [269,1-270,4], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 308 [268,25-270,4], Kratz, H. 1973a 264 [268,13-269,23], Schweikle, G. 1977 195 [268,1-270,4], Huber, H. 1981 143-44 [269,4-269,17], Haferland 1988 328 Anm. 194 [269,2-270,4], Huby, Michel 1989 263 Anm. 31 [269,4-270,4], Fuhrmann, J. 1994 101 s. auch Anm. 8 [268,1-272,30], Nellmann 1994c 600 [269,4-270,1], Unzeitig-Herzog 1998 206 [266,7-272,19], Backes, S. 1999 67 [269,4-269,30], 115 [269,4-269,30], Izumiya 2002 184 Anm. 17, Shockey 2002 63 [268,1-270,2] Jenseitsmotive: Dick, E. 1978a 81 [268,25-270,4] Juristisches: Backes, S. 1999 115 [269,4-269,30], 117 [269,12-269,21] Kommunikation: Godsall-Myers 2003b 96 [268,25-270,4] Minne u. Ehe: Kleber, J. 1992b 264 [269,4-269,17], Emmerling 2003 271 [269,1-270,4] Philologie: Schmidt, E. 1979 491, Yeandle 1984 316 Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 159 [268,25-269,19], Rachbauer 1970 159 [268,25-269,19], Rachbauer 1980 159 [268,25-269,19] Reim: Zwierzina 1900c 54 [269,11-269,12] Religion: Sattler 1895 101 [268,25-270,4], Mockenhaupt 1942 36, 38, 56 [269,2-270,4], 109 [269,4-269,17], Mockenhaupt 1968 36, 38, 56 [269,2-270,4], 109 [269,4-269,17], Bayer, Hans 1983 89 [268,25-270,4], 182 [268,28-270,4], Haferland 1994b 263 [268,25-270,4] schame: San-Marte 1861 179 [269,12-269,14], Heckel, H. 1939 66 [269,12-269,13], Hempel, H. 1951 159, Hoffmann, Werner 1963b 987, Hempel, H. 1966b 278, Schmidt, E. 1979 491, Weber, G. 1981 987, Pretzel 1982 58 [269,12-269,13], Yeandle 1994b 319 Anm. 38, 328 [269,4-269,17], 331, 337-38 Tab. 5 & 7, Garnerus 1999 199, Gilmour 2000 62 [269,12-269,13], Yeandle 2001 149 Anm. 22, 160 [269,4-269,17], 163, 168, Wolf, B. 2002 78 Anm. 467 [269,12-269,13] Schuld: Dimler 1970 130 [269,1-269,30] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 388 [269,1-270,4], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Syntax: Mourek 1911 3 [269,12-269,13], Horacek 1952c 279 [269,12-269,13], Horacek 1964 71 [269,12-269,13] Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 69 Wortsinn: Backes, S. 1999 117, Gilmour 2000 243 [269,12-269,14]
	[Zu 269,13]