269,24 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 269,23]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 115 [269,1-270,4] Adaptation: Hilka 1932 705 [268,25-270,4], 735 [268,25-270,4], Mergell 1943 40 Anm. 57 [269,22-269,25], 85 [269,1-270,4], Backes, S. 1999 111 [268,25-271,24] Artus: Schirok 1989c 79 [268,25-271,13] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 33 [269,1-270,4], 127 [269,12-270,4], 129 [269,4-270,4], Pastré 1994c 98 [269,24-269,25], 102 [269,24-270,4] Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 23 [268,25-270,4], 222 [269,4-270,4], Green 1981a 111, Green 1982b 21 [269,24-269,25], 124 [269,18-270,4], Stein, A. 1993 88 [269,18-269,25], Schu 2002 232 [268,25-270,4], 331 Anm. 21, Urscheler 2002 98 [269,7-271,23], 211 [269,24-269,25] Frauen (allgemein): Rinn 1996 139 [269,12-269,30] Gebärde u. Geste: Peil 1975 207 [269,1-270,4] Gewalt: Lienert 2002a 235 [269,1-270,4] Gral: Burdach 1938 514 [268,25-270,4], Burdach 1974 514 [268,25-270,4] Handschriftliches: Backes, S. 1999 118-19 [269,24-269,25] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 328 [269,1-269,30] Individualität: Sosna 2003 187 [268,25-271,13] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 828 [269,18-269,30], Weber, G. 1948 44 [268,25-271,22], 48 [269,1-270,4], Swinburne 1955 185 [269,24-269,25], Barber, R. 1970 109 [269,24-269,25], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Poag 1972a 49 [269,24-269,28], Roßkopf 1972 308 [268,25-270,4], Kratz, H. 1973a 264 [269,24-269,28], Wieners 1973 103 [269,24-269,25], Schweikle, G. 1977 195 [268,1-270,4], Brackert 1979 163 [269,24-269,25], Yeandle 1984 353 [269,24-269,25], Haferland 1988 328 Anm. 194 [269,2-270,4], Huby, Michel 1989 263 Anm. 31 [269,4-270,4], Fuhrmann, J. 1994 101 s. auch Anm. 8 [268,1-272,30], Nellmann 1994c 600 [269,4-270,1], Unzeitig-Herzog 1998 206 [266,7-272,19], Backes, S. 1999 67 [269,21-269,25], [269,4-269,30], 115 [269,4-269,30], Shockey 2002 63 [268,1-270,2], 88 [269,24-269,25] Ironie: Green 1979a 169 [269,20-269,25] Jenseitsmotive: Dick, E. 1978a 81 [268,25-270,4] Juristisches: Backes, S. 1999 115 [269,4-269,30] Kindheit u. Jugend: Geering 1899 24 [269,24-269,25], Schultz, J. 1995b 119 Anm. 71 [269,24-269,25], Russ 2000 70 Kommunikation: Godsall-Myers 2003b 96 [268,25-270,4] Minne u. Ehe: Mohr 1954b 106 [269,13-270,4], Mohr 1961 226 [269,13-270,4], Willson, H. 1968 192 [269,24-269,25], Kleber, J. 1992b 264 [269,18-269,30], Emmerling 2003 271 [269,24-269,25], [269,1-270,4] Orilus: Essen 1967 81 [269,24-269,25] Pädagogik: Essen 1967 71 [269,24-269,25] Psychologie: Sussman 1995 69 [269,24-269,25], Obleser 1997 87 [269,20-269,28] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 41 [269,20-269,28], Rachbauer 1934 159, 189 [269,20-269,28], Rachbauer 1970 159, 189 [269,20-269,28], Rachbauer 1980 159, 189 [269,20-269,28] Rätsel: Tomasek 1994 226 Anm. 32 Religion: Sattler 1895 101 [268,25-270,4], Mockenhaupt 1942 56 [269,2-270,4], Mockenhaupt 1968 56 [269,2-270,4], Bayer, Hans 1983 89 [268,25-270,4], 182 [268,28-270,4], Haferland 1994b 263 [268,25-270,4] Rezeption (allgemein): Tomasek 1994 226 Anm. 32 Schuld: Dimler 1970 130 [269,1-269,30], Wieners 1973 9 [269,24-269,25] Sprache: Beck, Hartmut 1994 214, Barufke 1995 110 Anm. 315 [269,24-269,25] Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Stein, W. 1988 111 [269,24-269,30] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 388 [269,1-270,4], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] tumpheit: Rupp, H. 1957a 100 [269,24-269,25], Haas, A. 1964 114 [269,24-270,4], Balthasar 1965 510 Anm. 53 [269,24-269,25], Backes, S. 1999 118-19 [269,24-269,25] Werkstruktur: Sauer, M. 1981 281 [269,24-269,25] Wortschatz: Büchel 1925 39 [269,24-269,25], 45 [269,24-269,25], Trier 1931a 263 [269,24-269,25], 268 [269,24-269,25], 270, 344, Trier 1973 263 [269,24-269,25], 268 [269,24-269,25], 270, 344 Wortsinn: Backes, S. 1999 118-19 [269,24-269,25], Gilmour 2000 59 [269,24-269,25] Zeitverhältnisse: Kartschoke, D. 2000 486 [269,24-269,25]
	[Zu 269,25]