290,29 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 48 [290,29-290,30], Mergell 1943 90 Anm. 35 [290,29-290,30], Pastré 1978 76 [290,24-293,18], Pastré 1979 287 [290,24-293,18], 368 [290,24-293,18], 369 [290,24-293,18] Allegorese: Freytag, W. und Freytag, H. 1973 316 [290,26-293,16] Ausgabe: Weber, G. 1981 784 Anm. 90 [290,26-290,30] Ausgabenmethodik: Hofmeister, R. 1974a 95 [290,28-291,3], 96 Anm. 35 Blutstropfenepisode: Freytag, W. und Freytag, H. 1973 316 [290,26-293,16], Dewald 1975 25 Anm. 1 [290,26-290,30], 26 [290,29-290,30], 31 [290,26-290,30], 111 [290,24-290,30], Ehlert und Meissburger 1975 214, 215, Delabar 1994 341 Anm. 22 [290,26-293,16] Buch VII: Zimmermann, Gisela 1974 317 [290,26-293,16] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 63 [290,26-290,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 80 [290,29-290,30] Erzähler: Bradley, R. 1981 42 [290,22-291,3], 49 [290,22-291,3], 50 [290,22-291,3], 80 [290,22-291,3], 81 [290,22-291,3], 82 [290,22-291,3], 89 [290,22-291,3], 278 [290,22-291,3] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 90 Anm. 35 [290,29-290,30], Ortmann 1972 63 [290,26-290,30], Dewald 1975 25 Anm. 1 [290,26-290,30], 26 [290,29-290,30], 31 [290,26-290,30], 111 [290,24-290,30], Bradley, R. 1981 42 [290,22-291,3], 49 [290,22-291,3], 50 [290,22-291,3], 80 [290,22-291,3], 81 [290,22-291,3], 82 [290,22-291,3], 89 [290,22-291,3], 278 [290,22-291,3] Farben u. Farbensymbolik: Freytag, W. und Freytag, H. 1973 316 [290,26-293,16] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] französischer Wortschatz: Suolahti 1933 309 Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 156 [288,15-290,30] Gesamtwürdigung: Fourquet 1979a 111-12 [290,1-290,30] Gral: Dewald 1975 25 Anm. 1 [290,26-290,30], 26 [290,29-290,30], 31 [290,26-290,30], 111 [290,24-290,30] Grammatik: Boysen 1910 153 Handschriftliches: Bonath 1970b 125 [290,29-290,30], Bonath 1971 107-08 [290,29-290,30] Hartmann von Aue: Wiegand 1972 156, 157, 162 [290,29-290,30], 228 Anm. 139 höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Interpretation: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Dewald 1975 25 Anm. 1 [290,26-290,30], 26 [290,29-290,30], 31 [290,26-290,30], 111 [290,24-290,30], Bradley, R. 1981 42 [290,22-291,3], 49 [290,22-291,3], 50 [290,22-291,3], 80 [290,22-291,3], 81 [290,22-291,3], 82 [290,22-291,3], 89 [290,22-291,3], 278 [290,22-291,3], Weber, G. 1981 784 Anm. 90 [290,26-290,30] Kommentar: Zimmermann, Gisela 1974 317 [290,26-293,16], Garnerus 1999 101, [290,29-290,30], Gilmour 2000 139 Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 48 [290,29-290,30] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Kinzel 1874 3 Minne u. Ehe: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wiegand 1972 156, 157, 162 [290,29-290,30], 228 Anm. 139, Freytag, W. und Freytag, H. 1973 316 [290,26-293,16], Dewald 1975 25 Anm. 1 [290,26-290,30], 26 [290,29-290,30], 31 [290,26-290,30], 111 [290,24-290,30], Schnell, Rüdiger 1994 121 Anm. 49 [290,1-293,16] Nacherzählung: Weber, G. 1981 784 Anm. 90 [290,26-290,30] Periphrase u. Umschreibung: Kinzel 1874 3 Personenbeziehungen: Delabar 1994 341 Anm. 22 [290,26-293,16] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 48 [290,29-290,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 48 [290,29-290,30], Ehlert und Meissburger 1975 214, 215 Rappoltsteiner Parzifal: Oltrogge und Schubert 2002 365 [290,29-290,30], 369 [290,29-290,30] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 156 [288,15-290,30], Oltrogge und Schubert 2002 365 [290,29-290,30], 369 [290,29-290,30] Rhetorik: Pastré 1979 287 [290,24-293,18], 368 [290,24-293,18], 369 [290,24-293,18] Sprache: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 80 [290,29-290,30], Dewald 1975 25 Anm. 1 [290,26-290,30], 26 [290,29-290,30], 31 [290,26-290,30], 111 [290,24-290,30] Stil: Kinzel 1874 3, Lichtenstein 1897 48 [290,29-290,30], Riemer, G. 1906 101, Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 80 [290,29-290,30], Mergell 1943 90 Anm. 35 [290,29-290,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 85 [290,28-290,30], 206 [290,3-290,30], Pastré 1978 76 [290,24-293,18] Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 25 Anm. 1 [290,26-290,30], 26 [290,29-290,30], 31 [290,26-290,30], 111 [290,24-290,30] Überlieferung: Hofstätter 1951 63 Anm. 3, 69-70 [290,11-291,18], 78 [290,29-290,30], Bonath 1970b 125 [290,29-290,30], Bonath 1971 107-08 [290,29-290,30], Hofmeister, R. 1974a 95 [290,28-291,3], 96 Anm. 35, Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 128 [290,11-291,18], Oltrogge und Schubert 2002 365 [290,29-290,30], 369 [290,29-290,30] Verskunst: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 80 [290,29-290,30] Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Hofmeister, R. 1974a 95 [290,28-291,3], 96 Anm. 35 Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 101 Wortsinn: Weber, G. 1981 784 Anm. 90 [290,26-290,30]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)