294, 2 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 116 [293,19-295,30], 217 [293,3-294,20] Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 48 [293,28-294,8], Weber, G. 1928 38 [293,9-294,20], Huby, Michel 1980a 6 Anm. 97 [293,30-294,8] Anakoluth: Horacek 1968 73 [294,2-294,3] Artus: Gürttler 1976 241 [293,19-295,30] Artusepik: Emmel 1951 100 [293,30-294,5], Gürttler 1976 241 [293,19-295,30], James-Raoul 1997 182 Anm. 2 [293,5-294,30] Bildungsroman: Misch 1927 268 [293,1-294,30] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 67 [294,2-294,20], 114 [293,30-294,20], Ehlert und Meissburger 1975 213 Anm. 130 [293,30-294,8] Enjambement: Horacek 1968 73 [294,2-294,3] Erzähltechnik: Dewald 1975 67 [294,2-294,20], 114 [293,30-294,20], Hirschberg 1976 179 [293,30-294,8], Green 1982b 129 [293,30-294,8], Schu 2002 192 Anm. 196 [293,19-295,27], Urscheler 2002 229 [294,2-294,5] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 157 [293,28-296,12] Gattung: Schu 2002 192 Anm. 196 [293,19-295,27] Gawan-Handlung: Sieverding 1985 239 [293,30-294,8] Gesamtwürdigung: Fourquet 1979a 112-13 [293,19-294,30] Gewalt: Röcke 2001 359 [293,19-296,12] Gral: Dewald 1975 67 [294,2-294,20], 114 [293,30-294,20] Handschriftliches: Bonath 1971 145, Stephan-Chlustin 2004 116 [293,19-295,30], 217 [293,3-294,20] Hartmann von Aue: Wiegand 1972 175 [293,19-295,30], 176 [293,30-294,8], Smits 1980 252 [293,19-295,30] Heidentum: San-Marte 1862b 42 [294,1-295,30] höfischer Roman: Gürttler 1976 241 [293,19-295,30], Schu 2002 192 Anm. 196 [293,19-295,27] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Interpretation: Misch 1927 268 [293,1-294,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Dewald 1975 67 [294,2-294,20], 114 [293,30-294,20], Green 1982b 129 [293,30-294,8], Pratelidis 1994 81 [293,28-294,20], 151 Anm. 15 [293,19-294,8], 157 [293,30-294,8] Jagd u. Vogelfang: Dalby 1965 197 [293,30-294,7] Keie: Röcke 2001 359 [293,19-296,12] Kommentar: Garnerus 1999 130 [293,28-294,20], 131, [293,30-294,5], 134 [293,30-294,8], 182 [294,2-294,5] Kommunikation: James-Raoul 1997 182 Anm. 2 [293,5-294,30], Urscheler 2002 229 [294,2-294,5] Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 48 [293,28-294,8], Weber, G. 1928 38 [293,9-294,20] Metrik: Horacek 1968 73 [294,2-294,3] Minne u. Ehe: San-Marte 1862b 42 [294,1-295,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wiegand 1972 175 [293,19-295,30], 176 [293,30-294,8], Dewald 1975 67 [294,2-294,20], 114 [293,30-294,20], Sieverding 1985 239 [293,30-294,8] Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 141 Anm. 38 [293,19-295,30] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 48 [293,28-294,8], Weber, G. 1928 38 [293,9-294,20] Quellen - Chrétien: Rochat 1858 99 [293,30-294,7], Lichtenstein 1897 48 [293,28-294,8], Weber, G. 1928 38 [293,9-294,20], Ehlert und Meissburger 1975 213 Anm. 130 [293,30-294,8] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 157 [293,28-296,12], Gürttler 1976 241 [293,19-295,30], Kern, Peter 1981 141 Anm. 38 [293,19-295,30] Ritterethik: San-Marte 1862b 42 [294,1-295,30] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: San-Marte 1862b 42 [294,1-295,30], Sieverding 1985 239 [293,30-294,8] Rittertum: San-Marte 1862b 42 [294,1-295,30] Soziologie: Pratelidis 1994 81 [293,28-294,20], 151 Anm. 15 [293,19-294,8], 157 [293,30-294,8] Sprache: San-Marte 1862b 42 [294,1-295,30], Dewald 1975 67 [294,2-294,20], 114 [293,30-294,20] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 48 [293,28-294,8], Weber, G. 1928 38 [293,9-294,20], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Kutzner 1975 86 [294,2-294,5], 206 [293,19-294,20] Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 67 [294,2-294,20], 114 [293,30-294,20] Syntax: Horacek 1964 238 [293,30-294,5], 240 [294,2-294,5], Horacek 1968 73 [294,2-294,3] Überlieferung: Hofstätter 1951 63 Anm. 3, 71-72 [293,7-294,12], Bonath 1971 145, Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 128 [293,7-294,12], Stephan-Chlustin 2004 116 [293,19-295,30], 217 [293,3-294,20] elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Sieverding 1985 239 [293,30-294,8] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 179 [293,30-294,8] Wortschatz: San-Marte 1862b 42 [294,1-295,30]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)