306,21 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) 
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 222 [306,10-307,6]
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 63, Mergell 1943 15 Anm. 4 [306,21-306,23], Wolf, A. 1985a 42 [305,14-307,12], Wolf, A. 1999h 306 [305,14-307,12]
Anfortas: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29]
Apokoinu: Leitzmann 1927c 94 [306,21-306,22], Sievers 1927 102-04 [306,21-306,22], Gärtner 1969 244-45 [306,21-306,22]
Buch III: Yeandle 1984 55 [306,21-306,23]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29], Ortmann 1972 130 [306,21-307,12], Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [306,21-307,12], Huber, H. 1981 56 [306,21-306,25], 209 [306,21-306,28], 280 Anm. 266 [306,21-306,28], 288 Anm. 321 [306,21-306,28]
Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29]
Cundrie la surziere: Izumiya 2002 180 [306,21-306,28], 192 [306,21-306,28]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Matz 1907 14 [306,21-306,22]
Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 15 Anm. 4 [306,21-306,23], Ortmann 1972 130 [306,21-307,12], Hirschberg 1976 119 [306,21-306,29]
Erziehung: Pastré 1993f 367 [306,9-307,6], 368 [306,16-308,10]
Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29]
Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29]
Gawan: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29]
Gebärde u. Geste: Peil 1975 41 Anm. 37 [306,21-306,22], 307 [306,21-306,22], Wenzel, H. 1996c 90 [306,21-306,28]
Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 214 Anm. 19 [306,10-306,25], 272 [305,7-308,22]
Grammatik: Gärtner 1969 244-45 [306,21-306,22]
groteske Figuren: Michel 1976 286 Anm. 101.1 [306,21-306,23]
Handschriftliches: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 222 [306,10-307,6]
Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29]
höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Voorwinden 1999c 170 [306,21-306,22]
Individualität: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29]
indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 297 [306,9-307,6], 298 [306,16-307,12], Pastré 1993f 367 [306,9-307,6], 368 [306,16-308,10]
Interpretation: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Hahn, I. 1975 227 Anm. 97 [306,21-306,23], 229 [306,21-306,23], Mohr 1979l 230-31 [306,21-306,28], Huber, H. 1981 56 [306,21-306,25], 209 [306,21-306,28], 280 Anm. 266 [306,21-306,28], 288 Anm. 321 [306,21-306,28], Izumiya 2002 180 [306,21-306,28], 192 [306,21-306,28]
Kleidung, Mode, Textilien: Brüggen 1993 207 Anm. 39 [306,10-307,12]
Kommentar: Yeandle 1984 55 [306,21-306,23], Garnerus 1999 205 [305,14-307,12], 209-10 [305,16-307,5], 212 [306,21-306,22], 213 [306,21-306,22], 214 [305,27-307,6], 222 [306,21-306,22], Gilmour 2000 102 [306,21-306,22], 197 [306,21-306,23], 200 [306,21-306,23]
Kommunikation: Wenzel, H. 1996c 90 [306,21-306,28]
Körper u. Körperteile: Wenzel, H. 1996c 90 [306,21-306,28]
Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 63
Lichtmetaphorik: Hahn, I. 1975 227 Anm. 97 [306,21-306,23], 229 [306,21-306,23], Huber, H. 1981 56 [306,21-306,25], 209 [306,21-306,28], 280 Anm. 266 [306,21-306,28], 288 Anm. 321 [306,21-306,28], Cessari 2000 77 [306,21-306,28]
Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Mohr 1979l 230-31 [306,21-306,28], Fuchs-Jolie 2004 266 [306,21-306,27]
Minne u. Ehe: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Parzival: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29]
Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 176 Anm. 45 [306,10-307,12]
Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 63
Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 63
Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Matz 1907 14 [306,21-306,22]
Reim: Matz 1907 14 [306,21-306,22]
Religion: Cessari 2000 77 [306,21-306,28]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Kern, Peter 1981 176 Anm. 45 [306,10-307,12]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 201 [306,10-307,6]
Rhetorik: Fuchs-Jolie 2004 266 [306,21-306,27]
Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Voorwinden 1999c 170 [306,21-306,22]
Schönheit: Hahn, I. 1975 227 Anm. 97 [306,21-306,23], 229 [306,21-306,23], Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [306,21-307,12], Huber, H. 1981 56 [306,21-306,25], 209 [306,21-306,28], 280 Anm. 266 [306,21-306,28], 288 Anm. 321 [306,21-306,28], Wenzel, H. 1996c 90 [306,21-306,28]
Schriftlichkeit: Wandhoff 1996 221 [306,21-306,28]
fünf Sinne: Wenzel, H. 1996c 90 [306,21-306,28]
Sprache: Mohr 1979l 230-31 [306,21-306,28]
Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 63, Mergell 1943 15 Anm. 4 [306,21-306,23], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18]
Syntax: Leitzmann 1927c 94 [306,21-306,22], Gärtner 1969 244-45 [306,21-306,22]
Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29]
Überlieferung: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 222 [306,10-307,6]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 230 [306,9-307,12]
Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Fuchs-Jolie 2004 266 [306,21-306,27]
Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 119 [306,21-306,29], Pastré 1993c 297 [306,9-307,6], 298 [306,16-307,12]
 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)