311,22 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 311,21]
Adaptation: Wolf, A. 1985a 44 [311,21-311,23], [311,16-311,30], Garnerus 1999 235-36 [309,3-312,1], Wolf, A. 1999h 307 [311,21-311,23], [311,16-311,30] Allegorese: Hüning 2000 172 [311,17-311,26] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 118 [311,9-311,28], 195 Anm. 1, Ortmann 1972 130 [311,10-312,1] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Wolff, L. 1924 182 [311,20-312,1], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [311,21-311,28], Wolff, L. 1967e 186 [311,20-312,1] Erzähler: Garnerus 1999 248 [311,15-311,22] Erzähltechnik: Garnerus 1999 205 [308,23-312,1], 235-36 [309,3-312,1], 248 [311,15-311,22], [311,9-311,29], Schu 2002 202 Anm. 231 ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 168 [311,20-311,22] das Fremde: Brall 1991a 157 [311,10-311,29] groteske Figuren: Peeters, J. 1993 144 [311,15-311,28] Handschriftliches: Hüning 2000 163-64 [311,17-311,26] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Olschki 1961 106 Anm. 20, Olschki 1966 71 höfisches Leben: Brall 1986 578 Anm. 68 [311,20-311,24], Haug 2002b 72 Anm. 44 [311,15-311,22] Hyperbel: Garnerus 1999 248 [311,9-311,29] Individualität: Gerok-Reiter 1996 758 [311,9-311,28] Interpretation: Klein, Karl Kurt 1954/55 152 [311,20-311,24], Bertau 1972/73 847 [311,20-311,22], Mersmann 1971 132 [311,10-312,1], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 272 [311,4-312,1], Bertau 1977b 34 Anm. 59 [311,20-312,1], Huber, H. 1981 54 [311,18-311,22], 62 [311,15-311,25], 211 [311,9-311,28], Bertau 1983g 153 [311,20-312,1], Czerwinski 1989 111 [311,9-311,29], Garnerus 1999 235-36 [309,3-312,1], 248 [311,15-311,22], [311,9-311,29], 249-50 [311,18-311,22], 250-51, Steppich 1999 63 [309,15-311,30], Izumiya 2002 181 [311,18-311,22], 192 [311,18-311,28] Ironie: Green 1979a 40 Anm. 2 [311,9-311,29], Garnerus 1999 248 [311,9-311,29] Jungfräulichkeit: Müller, Maria E 1995 208 [311,15-311,28] Körper u. Körperteile: Ernst 2002 196 [311,9-311,22] Lichtmetaphorik: Lofmark 1977b 991 [311,15-311,22] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Pastré 1979 148, Garnerus 1999 249-50 [311,18-311,22], 250-51, Hartmann, Heiko 2000 372 [311,20-311,22], Hüning 2000 156 [311,18-311,22], 163 [311,18-311,22], 164-65 [311,17-311,25] Minne u. Ehe: San-Marte 1862b 150 [311,20-311,24] Philologie: Eichholz 1987 264 Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 51 [311,4-311,30], Rachbauer 1934 207 [311,4-311,30], Rachbauer 1970 207 [311,4-311,30], Rachbauer 1980 207 [311,4-311,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Schröder, Werner 1982a 65 [311,21-311,22] Richtungskonstruktionen: Wießner 1902 60 Schönheit: San-Marte 1862b 153 [311,10-311,26], Heckel, H. 1939 93-94 [311,10-311,29], Wenzel, H. 1996c 90 [311,9-311,22], Garnerus 1999 212 [311,9-311,28], 222 [311,10-311,22], 248 [311,9-311,29], Pappas 2001 161 [311,18-311,22] Schriftlichkeit: Wandhoff 1996 222 [311,9-312,1] Selbstverteidigung: Boigs 1992 4 Anm. 19 [311,20-311,24], 6 [311,20-311,24], 17 [311,20-312,1] Sprache: Mohr 1979l 232 [311,20-311,28] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 47 [311,9-311,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Robertson und Reich 1970 85 [311,7-311,28], Heinzle 1972 88 [311,22-311,23], Kratz, H. 1973a 122 [311,16-311,22], Kutzner 1975 89-90 [311,19-311,25], Kratz, H. 1989 675 zitiert als 311.3-312.1 [311,15-311,28], Garnerus 1999 248 [311,9-311,29] Syntax: Mourek 1911 16 [311,21-311,22], 26 [311,20-311,22] Tugenden: Brinker-von der Heyde 1996b 103 Anm. 229 [310,15-312,2] Überlieferung: Nock 1968 159 Utopie: Haug 1981 14 [311,9-311,29], Haug 1989h 522 [311,9-311,29] Werkstruktur: Haug 1971 697 [311,9-311,29], Haug 1989g 505-506 [311,9-311,29] Wortsinn: Garnerus 1999 250-51 zwîvel: San-Marte 1861 175 [311,22-311,23], Gerhard 1926 173, Hempel, H. 1951 168 [311,22-311,24], 176 [311,22-311,23], 177 [311,20-311,28], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 228 Anm. 1, Hempel, H. 1966b 284 [311,22-311,24], 290 [311,22-311,23], 291 [311,20-311,28], Gerhard 1968 173, Yeandle 1984 81 [311,22-311,28], Garnerus 1999 250-51, Brackert 2000 341 Anm. 31, Brackert und Fuchs-Jolie 2002 246 [311,22-311,23]
	[Zu 311,23]