330,29 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 330,28]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 100 [330,29-330,30], 105 [330,10-330,30], 177 Anm. 81 [329,25-330,30], Henzen 1958 434 [330,1-332,30], Pastré 1979 367 [328,1-330,30], Wolf, A. 1985a 46 [329,16-330,30], 49 [330,21-330,30], 51, Wolf, A. 1999h 309 [329,16-330,30], 312 [330,21-330,30], 315
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 267, Ortmann 1972 41 [329,14-330,30], 63 [329,16-330,30], 113 [329,14-330,30], 130 [329,14-330,30], 131 [329,14-330,30]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Schreiber, A. 1922 139 [330,28-330,30], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 66 Anm. 4 [329,15-330,30], 80 [330,25-330,30], 148 [330,25-330,30]
Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 96 [330,7-330,30], 97 Anm. 27 [330,17-330,30], 135 [330,21-330,30], 335 [329,16-330,30], Parshall 1981 115 [330,1-330,30], Stein, A. 1993 137 Anm. 255 [329,16-331,18], Schu 2002 167 [330,29-330,30]
ethischer Wortschatz: Maurer 1951b 129
französischer Wortschatz: Suolahti 1933 294
Gawan-Handlung: Jones, M. 1999 42 [330,29-330,30]
Gral: Burdach 1938 510 [330,26-330,30], Mergell 1951b 15 [330,21-330,30], 61 [330,29-330,30], Mergell 1952b 15 [330,21-330,30], 61 [330,29-330,30], Mergell 1953c 102 [330,29-330,30], Loomis 1963b 207 Anm. 2 [330,29-330,30], Burdach 1974 510 [330,26-330,30], Dewald 1975 147 [330,29-330,30], 148 Anm. 9 [329,16-333,13], 159 [329,16-330,30], Loomis 1991 207 Anm. 2 [330,29-330,30]
Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 250 [330,12-330,30]
Hilfe u. Rat: Mohr 1954a 176, 188 [330,29-330,30], Mohr 1979d 40, 52 [330,29-330,30]
Individualität: Buschinger 2002b 190 [330,28-330,30], Sosna 2003 192 [329,16-330,30]
Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 46 [330,10-330,30], 50 [330,28-330,30], 52 [330,28-330,30], 206, Alker 1953 9 [330,28-330,30], Richter, J. 1953 11 [330,29-330,30], Swinburne 1955 184 [330,29-330,30], Wynn 1962 147 [330,21-330,30], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1963 34 [330,28-330,30], Johnson, S. 1970a 111 [330,21-330,30], Schröder, Werner 1971a 126 [330,29-330,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 240 [329,20-330,30], 254 [330,28-330,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 278 [330,21-330,30], Schmidt, J. 1974 376 [330,29-330,30], 377 [330,29-330,30], Dewald 1975 338 [329,16-330,30], Jones, M. 1975 61 [330,29-330,30], Spitz 1975 250 [330,29-330,30], Weigand, H. 1978 454 [330,29-330,30], Mohr 1979j 215 [329,14-330,30], Huber, H. 1981 219 [330,29-330,30], Green 1982g 229 [330,21-331,2], Marly 1982a 213 Anm. 13 [329,16-330,30], Weigand, H. 1982b 36 [330,29-330,30], Wynn 1984 166 [330,21-330,30], Schweikle, G. 1986c 82 [330,29-330,30], Lampe 1987b 331 [330,29-330,30], Haferland 1988 198 [330,28-330,30], Schröder, Werner 1989b 201 [330,29-330,30], Schröder, Werner 1989q 235 [330,29-330,30], Steppich 1990 285 [330,29-330,30], Bumke 1991d 82 [330,29-330,30], Schröder, Werner 1993 40 [330,29-330,30], Pratelidis 1994 214 [330,8-331,10], Bumke 1997a 60 [330,29-330,30], Kordt 1997 244 [330,29-330,30], Steppich 1999 69 Anm. 78 [330,29-330,30], Bumke 2001a 5 [330,29-330,30], Pappas 2001 164 Anm. 25 [330,1-330,30], Wynn 2002b 177 [330,21-330,30], Bumke 2004 78 [330,29-330,30]
Jungfräulichkeit: Müller, Maria E 1995 211 [329,20-330,30]
Kommunikation: Schnyder, M. 2003 322 [330,1-330,30]
Lichtmetaphorik: Steinmetz, R. 2002 518 [330,21-330,30]
Pädagogik: Ludwig, E. 1953 66 [330,29-330,30], Essen 1967 72 [329,14-330,30], 98 [330,29-330,30]
Philologie: Schmidt, E. 1979 16, Yeandle 1984 175
Psychologie: Meyer zur Capellen 1993 125 [330,28-330,30], Blank 1995 115 [330,1-330,30], Obleser 1997 97 [330,20-330,30]
Quellen - allgemein: Golther 1925a 167 [330,1-330,30]
Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 54 [330,1-331,10], Rachbauer 1934 212 [330,1-330,30], Rachbauer 1970 212 [330,1-330,30], Rachbauer 1980 212 [330,1-330,30]
Religion: San-Marte 1861 263 [329,1-330,30], Mockenhaupt 1942 72 [330,29-330,30], Lowet 1955 197 [330,1-330,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 72 [330,29-330,30], Duckworth 1980 118 [330,21-330,30], 293 [329,20-330,30], Schäfer, J. 1996 46 [330,26-330,30]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 163 [329,17-331,30]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 136 [329,16-330,30], 156 [330,29-330,30], 222 [329,16-330,30]
Ritterethik: Keferstein 1937a 66 Anm. 9
Schriftlichkeit: Wandhoff 1996 221 [330,1-330,30]
Schuld: Maurer 1950 311, Maurer 1966 58, Kordt 1997 229 [330,20-330,30]
Stil: Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18], Nellmann 1994c 622 [330,29-330,30]
Sünde: Sacker 1963 60-61 [330,21-330,30]
Syntax: Horacek 1964 231 [330,29-330,30], 232 [330,29-330,30], 236
tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 129 [329,16-330,30]
Überlieferung: Engels 1970 36 [330,25-330,30], Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 110 [330,15-332,4], 115 [330,10-331,8]
übersetzter Abschnitt: Richey 1957b 18 [329,25-330,30], Weber, G. 1981 795 Anm. 107 [330,29-330,30]
Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Peschel-Rentsch 1998c 113 [330,28-330,29]
Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Fritsch-Rößler 2002b 140 [330,29-330,30], 144 [330,29-330,30], Schirok 2002b 108 [330,29-330,30], 109 [330,29-330,30]
Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 78
 [Zu 330,30]