383, 3 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 383, 2]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 254 [382,12-383,16], Pastré 1979 370 [382,9-383,22] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 375 [383,1-383,5], Ringeler 2000 159 [383,1-383,5] Chrétien (außer Perceval): Nellmann 1996b 335 Anm. 34 [382,12-383,5] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Schreiber, A. 1922 167 [383,1-383,4], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 44 [382,12-383,5], 153 [383,1-383,3] Erzähltechnik: Harroff 1974 95 [383,1-383,30], 129 Anm. 6 [382,12-383,16], Green 1982b 138 [383,1-383,5], 267 [383,1-383,5], 268 Anm. 32 [383,1-383,5], Groos 1995 12 Anm. 26 [383,1-383,10], Schu 2002 371 Anm. 138 [383,1-383,10], 382 [383,1-383,11] Gawan: Richey 1923b 62 Anm. 37 [383,1-383,16] Gawan-Handlung: Sacker 1963 68 [382,9-383,16] Geschichte: Snelleman 1941 100 Anm. 100 [383,1-383,5] Ilinôt: San-Marte 1858a 485 [383,1-383,12], Busby 1981 32 [383,1-383,12] Interpretation: Huth 1972 19 [383,2-383,5], 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 282 [382,9-383,16], Zimmermann, Gisela 1974 264 [382,9-383,16], 290 [382,9-383,16], Schirok 1988c 437 [383,1-383,12], Schmid, E. 1993b 188 [383,1-383,16], Brackert 1996 163 Anm. 25 [383,1-383,10] Intertextualität: Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 680 Anm. 36 [383,1-383,12], Draesner 1993 306 Anm. 23 [382,12-383,16], 306-07 [382,12-383,5], 367 [383,1-383,8], 419 [382,16-383,12] Namen: Passage 1984 178 [383,1-383,5], Chandler 1992 185 [383,1-383,5] Philologie: Nolte, T. 1990 131 Anm. 39 [383,1-383,30] Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 29 [383,1-383,12] Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Matz 1907 77 Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 169 [380,1-383,17], Gürttler 1976 289 [383,1-383,10], Belitz 1978 370 Anm. 117 [383,1-383,5], Kern, Peter 1981 116 Anm. 9 [383,1-383,12], Stein, Peter 2000 122 Anm. 329 [383,1-383,10] Rittertum: Neudeck 1994b 55 Anm. 12 [383,1-383,12] Rüstung: Doubek 1934/35 335 [383,2-383,3], Schreiber, A. 1922 167 [383,1-383,4], Cucuel 1937 23 [383,1-383,5], Gilmour 2000 70 [383,1-383,4] Sprache: Tao 1997 139 [383,1-383,12] Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: San-Marte 1858a 485 [383,1-383,12], Lewis 1974 107 [383,1-383,5] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 129 [382,17-383,16] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 121 [383,1-383,12], 152 Anm. 45 [383,1-383,5], Groos 1995 12 Anm. 26 [383,1-383,10], Sutter 2003 59 [383,1-383,5] Wappenkunde: Hatto 1968/69 27 [383,1-383,12], Bertau 1972/73 1013 [383,1-383,5], San-Marte 1858a 485 [383,1-383,12], Kurz 1916 34 Anm. 4 [383,1-383,4], Schreiber, A. 1922 167 [383,1-383,4], Cucuel 1937 23 [383,1-383,5], 41 [382,23-383,4], Lewis 1974 107 [383,1-383,5], Schmidt, E. 1979 367 [383,1-383,4], Hatto 1980d 196 [383,1-383,12], Hartmann, Heiko 2002 168 [383,1-383,12], 177 [383,1-383,12] Zeitverhältnisse: Rührmund 1848 467 [382,12-383,5]
	[Zu 383, 4]