4,24 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 316 Anm. 4 [4,24-4,26] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26] Apokoinu: Gärtner 1969 150 [4,23-4,24] Artusepik: Schultz, J. 1983 155 [4,14-4,26], 230 Anm. 36 [4,14-4,26], Mertens, V. 1998 107 Ausgabe: Ulzen 1974 I - 66 [1,1-4,26], Nellmann 1994c 445 [1,1-4,26], 453, 454, 514 [4,23-4,24] âventiure: Green 1978c 100 [4,24-4,26], 120 [4,24-4,26], Classen 1995e 9 [4,24-4,25], Schnyder, M. 2002a 311 [4,23-4,26] Bibelmotivik: Spitz 1975 262 [4,15-4,26] Bibliographie: Eggers 1953/54 287 [4,9-4,26], Bumke 1970a 277 [4,9-4,26], 283 [4,9-4,26], 284 [3,28-4,26], 285 [3,25-4,26], 289 [1,1-4,26], Eggers 1953/54 287 [4,9-4,26] Blutstropfenepisode: Bumke 2001a 131, Schröder, Werner 2002 151 [4,24-4,25] Bogengleichnis: Spitz 1975 262 [4,15-4,26], Rausch 2000 56 [3,25-4,26] Buch I: Hatto 1952/53 232-36 [1,15-4,26] Buch II: Hatto 1952/53 232-36 [1,15-4,26], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 325 [4,24-4,26], 332, 348 [4,14-4,26], 349 [4,23-4,26], Hatto 1952/53 232-36 [1,15-4,26] Buch VII: Zimmermann, Gisela 1974 12 [4,23-4,26] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26], Schröder, J. 2004 71 [1,1-4,26] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26] Datierung: Schröder, Werner 1957 292 [4,9-4,26], Schröder, Werner 1989e 30 [4,9-4,26] dienst: Classen 1995e 9 [4,24-4,25] Eilhart: Geil 1973 64 [4,20-4,26] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Richey 1923b 86 [1,1-4,30], Kratz, H. 1966 75-98 [1,1-4,26], Poag 1972a 42 [1,1-4,26], 43 [4,23-4,26], 73 [1,1-4,26], 74 [4,9-4,26], Schäfer, H. 1983 20, Boigs 1984 11 [1,1-4,26], Schäfer, H. 1985 24, Boigs 1992 20 [1,1-4,26], Hatto 1952/53 232-36 [1,15-4,26], Menhardt 1955/56 237-40 [1,1-4,26] Erzähler: Curschmann 1971a 631 [4,9-4,26], Nellmann 1971a 393 [4,23-4,24], 394 [4,23-4,24], Pörksen, U. 1971 24, Nellmann 1973a 11 [3,25-4,26], 86 [4,23-4,24], 87 [4,23-4,24], Bradley, R. 1981 i [1,1-4,26], 31 Anm. 7 [1,1-4,26], 133 [2,23-4,25], 154 Anm. 17 [4,9-4,26], 172 [4,24-4,26], Campbell, K. 1982 755 [1,1-4,26], Karg, I. 1993b 57 Erzähltechnik: Richey 1923b 86 [1,1-4,30], Gerz 1930 67 [4,9-4,26], Mergell 1943 316 Anm. 4 [4,24-4,26], Gerz 1967 67 [4,9-4,26], Nellmann 1973a 11 [3,25-4,26], 86 [4,23-4,24], 87 [4,23-4,24], Green 1978c 100 [4,24-4,26], 120 [4,24-4,26], Bradley, R. 1981 i [1,1-4,26], 31 Anm. 7 [1,1-4,26], 133 [2,23-4,25], 154 Anm. 17 [4,9-4,26], 172 [4,24-4,26], Green 1981a 117, Sauer, M. 1981 74 [3,25-4,27], 254 [4,23-4,26], Campbell, K. 1982 755 [1,1-4,26], Green 1982b 16 [4,23-4,25], 18, Green 1983a 53 [4,23-4,25], 54, Kiening 1991 59, 208 Anm. 149, 210 Anm. 159 [4,24-4,26], Stein, A. 1993 195 [4,23-4,26], Groos 1995 3 [3,28-4,26], 4 [4,23-4,24], Rausch 2000 56 [3,25-4,26], Schirok 2002a 79 Anm. 54 [4,23-4,24], Schu 2002 61-62 [3,28-4,26], 112 [4,23-4,26], 127 Anm. 17, Curschmann 2004 24 [4,24-4,25] ethischer Wortschatz: Hempel, H. 1951 186 [4,9-4,26], Wapnewski 1955 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Hempel, H. 1966b 297 [4,9-4,26], Bohnen 1976 3-38 [1,1-4,26], Wapnewski 1982 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Gibbs 1999 12 [4,18-4,26] Faksimile: Ulzen 1974 I - 66 [1,1-4,26] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 386 Anm. 88 [4,12-4,26], Rausch 2000 56 [3,25-4,26] Forschungsbericht: Bumke 1970a 277 [4,9-4,26], 283 [4,9-4,26], 284 [3,28-4,26], 285 [3,25-4,26], 289 [1,1-4,26], Bohnen 1976 3-38 [1,1-4,26], Eggers 1953/54 287 [4,9-4,26] Fragen: Janko 1992a 269 [4,23-4,26] Frauenfiguren: Hafner 1994 97, Gibbs 1999 12 [4,18-4,26] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 62 [4,9-6,6], Bastert 1993 149 [4,2-4,26] Gahmuret: Richey 1923b 86 [1,1-4,30], Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26] Gattung: Düwel 1983 95 [4,24-4,26], 96, 97, 106 [4,24-4,26], 156, 262 Anm. 51, Groos 1995 3 [3,28-4,26], 4 [4,23-4,24], Schu 2002 61-62 [3,28-4,26], 112 [4,23-4,26], 127 Anm. 17 Gawan: Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26], Shockey 2002 4 [4,20-4,26], 385 Gawan-Handlung: Sauer, M. 1981 74 [3,25-4,27], 254 [4,23-4,26], Karg, I. 1993b 57, Jones, M. 1999 37 genâde: Classen 1995e 9 [4,24-4,25] Gesamtwürdigung: Poag 1972a 42 [1,1-4,26], 43 [4,23-4,26], 73 [1,1-4,26], 74 [4,9-4,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 20 [1,1-4,26], 100 [1,1-4,26], 456 [4,9-4,26], Brackert 1979 159 [1,1-4,27], Bumke 1991d 47 [1,1-4,26], Bumke 1997a 32 [3,28-4,26], Mertens, V. 1998 107, McFarland 2000 58 [3,28-4,26], Reichert, H. 2002 52-54 [2,23-4,26] Gottfried von Straßburg: Hempel, H. 1966c 261-76 [4,9-4,26], Norman 1969 76, Ragotzky 1971 26 Anm. 21 [4,9-4,26], Geil 1973 64 [4,20-4,26], Bohnen 1976 3-38 [1,1-4,26], Brall 1983a 30 Anm. 73 [1,1-4,26], 33 [3,25-4,26], Hüning 2000 116 [4,19-4,24], Hempel, H. 1951/52 162-80 [4,9-4,26] Gral: Mockenhaupt 1968 120 [4,12-4,26], Schult 1975 65 [4,9-4,26], Schäfer, H. 1983 20, Schäfer, H. 1985 24, Karg, I. 1993b 57 Grammatik: Gärtner 1969 150 [4,23-4,24] gruoz: Classen 1995e 9 [4,24-4,25] Handschriftliches: Lampe 1987b 66 [4,23-4,26], 67 [4,23-4,26], 71-75 [1,1-4,26], Lampe 1987c 154 [1,1-4,26], Hatto 1952/53 232-36 [1,15-4,26] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Wapnewski 1982 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Willson, H. 1991b 165 Anm. 5 [1,1-4,26], Hüning 2000 116 [4,19-4,24] Heinrich von dem Türlin: Shockey 2002 4 [4,20-4,26], 385 Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 71 [1,1-4,26] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26], Hafner 1994 97 höfischer Roman: Schu 2002 61-62 [3,28-4,26], 112 [4,23-4,26], 127 Anm. 17 höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 386 Anm. 88 [4,12-4,26] Humor: Wynn 1982 130 Anm. 13 [4,21-4,28] Ikonographie: Adolf 1937 110-20 [1,1-4,26], 171-85 [1,1-4,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26] Interpretation: Adolf 1937 110-20 [1,1-4,26], 171-85 [1,1-4,26], Rupp, H. 1961 29-45 [1,1-4,26], Brinkmann, H. 1964b 402 [3,28-4,26], Brinkmann, H. 1966c 106-07 [3,28-4,26], Hempel, H. 1966c 261-76 [4,9-4,26], Kratz, H. 1966 75-98 [1,1-4,26], Rupp, H. 1966b 369-387 [1,1-4,26], Essen 1967 69 [3,28-4,26], 73 [1,1-4,26], Huth 1972 386 Anm. 88 [4,12-4,26], Poag 1972a 42 [1,1-4,26], 43 [4,23-4,26], 73 [1,1-4,26], 74 [4,9-4,26], Schult 1975 65 [4,9-4,26], Spitz 1975 262 [4,15-4,26], Bohnen 1976 3-38 [1,1-4,26], Green 1978c 100 [4,24-4,26], 120 [4,24-4,26], Bradley, R. 1981 i [1,1-4,26], 31 Anm. 7 [1,1-4,26], 133 [2,23-4,25], 154 Anm. 17 [4,9-4,26], 172 [4,24-4,26], Sauer, M. 1981 74 [3,25-4,27], 254 [4,23-4,26], Campbell, K. 1982 755 [1,1-4,26], Green 1982b 16 [4,23-4,25], 18, Brall 1983b 57 Anm. 75 [1,1-4,26], 63 [3,25-4,26], Schultz, J. 1983 155 [4,14-4,26], 230 Anm. 36 [4,14-4,26], Lampe 1987b 66 [4,23-4,26], 67 [4,23-4,26], 71-75 [1,1-4,26], Lampe 1987c 154 [1,1-4,26], Janko 1992a 269 [4,23-4,26], Karg, I. 1993b 57, Stein, A. 1993 195 [4,23-4,26], Pratelidis 1994 54 [4,9-4,26], Groos 1995 3 [3,28-4,26], 4 [4,23-4,24], Mertens, V. 1998 107, Hüning 2000 116 [4,19-4,24], Schirok 2002a 79 Anm. 54 [4,23-4,24], Shockey 2002 4 [4,20-4,26], 385, Hempel, H. 1951/52 162-80 [4,9-4,26] Jüngerer Titurel: Ragotzky 1971 26 Anm. 21 [4,9-4,26] Kindheit u. Jugend: Peschel-Rentsch 1998c 105 [4,23-4,25] Kommentar: Zimmermann, Gisela 1974 12 [4,23-4,26], Nellmann 1994c 445 [1,1-4,26], 453, 454, 514 [4,23-4,24], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 325 [4,24-4,26], 332, 348 [4,14-4,26], 349 [4,23-4,26] Kyot: Hart 1989 96 [4,23-4,26], 97 [4,23-4,26] Literaturgeschichte: Ehrismann, G. 1927 256 [1,1-4,26], Ehrismann, O. und Kaminsky 1976 212, Birkhan, H. 2003b 143-46 [1,1-4,27] Männer (allgemein): Hafner 2004 149 Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Hüning 2000 116 [4,19-4,24] Minne u. Ehe: Wapnewski 1955 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Wolf, N. 1970 60 [4,9-4,26], Huth 1972 386 Anm. 88 [4,12-4,26], Wapnewski 1982 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Kleber, J. 1992b 223 [4,18-4,26], Karg, I. 1993b 57 Namen: Geil 1973 64 [4,20-4,26], Mohr 1979q 489, Green 1981a 117, Chandler 1992 228 [4,14-4,26] Naturwissenschaft: Groos 1995 3 [3,28-4,26], 4 [4,23-4,24] Orient: Schäfer, H. 1983 20, Schäfer, H. 1985 24 Pädagogik: Heise 1965 32 [3,25-4,26], 34 [3,25-4,26], Essen 1967 69 [3,28-4,26], 73 [1,1-4,26] Parzival: Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26] Personenbeziehungen: Gellinek 1978 105, Gellinek 1980d 166, 173 Anm. 11 Philologie: Schröder, Werner 1975c 282 [4,24-4,25], 284, Green 1978c 100 [4,24-4,26], 120 [4,24-4,26], Schröder, Werner 1989z 420 [4,24-4,25], 422 Prolog: Hempel, H. 1951/52 162-80 [4,9-4,26], Menhardt 1955/56 237-40 [1,1-4,26], Lachmann, K. 1876b 496 [3,25-4,26], Adolf 1937 110-20 [1,1-4,26], 171-85 [1,1-4,26], Wapnewski 1955 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Willson, H. 1957a 571 [3,25-4,26], Rupp, H. 1961 29-45 [1,1-4,26], Brinkmann, H. 1964b 402 [3,28-4,26], Brinkmann, H. 1966c 106-07 [3,28-4,26], Hempel, H. 1966c 261-76 [4,9-4,26], Kratz, H. 1966 75-98 [1,1-4,26], Rupp, H. 1966b 369-387 [1,1-4,26], Lachmann, K. 1969d 496 [3,25-4,26], Singer, J. 1974 104 [4,9-4,24], Ulzen 1974 I - 66 [1,1-4,26], Bohnen 1976 3-38 [1,1-4,26], Wapnewski 1982 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Brall 1983a 30 Anm. 73 [1,1-4,26], 33 [3,25-4,26], Hüning 2000 116 [4,19-4,24], Rausch 2000 56 [3,25-4,26], Hempel, H. 1951/52 162-80 [4,9-4,26], Hatto 1952/53 232-36 [1,15-4,26], Menhardt 1955/56 237-40 [1,1-4,26] Quellen - allgemein: Poag 1972a 42 [1,1-4,26], 43 [4,23-4,26], 73 [1,1-4,26], 74 [4,9-4,26], Schult 1975 65 [4,9-4,26] Quellen - Chrétien: Hart 1989 96 [4,23-4,26], 97 [4,23-4,26] Rätsel: Hüning 2000 116 [4,19-4,24] Raum u. Bewegung: Shockey 2002 4 [4,20-4,26], 385 Realismus: Huth 1972 386 Anm. 88 [4,12-4,26] Religion: Knorr 1935a 87 [1,1-4,26], Mockenhaupt 1942 120 [4,12-4,26], Wapnewski 1955 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Willson, H. 1957a 571 [3,25-4,26], Mockenhaupt 1968 120 [4,12-4,26], Bohnen 1976 3-38 [1,1-4,26], Wapnewski 1982 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Lampe 1987b 66 [4,23-4,26], 67 [4,23-4,26], 71-75 [1,1-4,26], Lampe 1987c 154 [1,1-4,26], Groos 1995 3 [3,28-4,26], 4 [4,23-4,24] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 62 [4,9-6,6], Ragotzky 1971 26 Anm. 21 [4,9-4,26], Singer, J. 1974 104 [4,9-4,24], Jürgens-Lochthove 1980 74 [4,9-4,26], Bastert 1993 149 [4,2-4,26], Shockey 2002 4 [4,20-4,26], 385 Rhetorik: Nellmann 1973a 11 [3,25-4,26], 86 [4,23-4,24], 87 [4,23-4,24] Ritterethik: Mockenhaupt 1968 120 [4,12-4,26] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Schröder, J. 2004 71 [1,1-4,26] Ritterorden: Schäfer, H. 1985 24 Rittertum: Green 1978c 100 [4,24-4,26], 120 [4,24-4,26], Groos 1995 3 [3,28-4,26], 4 [4,23-4,24] Schicksal u. Fortuna: Schnyder, M. 2002a 311 [4,23-4,26] Schriftlichkeit: Curschmann 2004 24 [4,24-4,25] Schuld: Hempel, H. 1951 186 [4,9-4,26], Hempel, H. 1966b 297 [4,9-4,26], Mockenhaupt 1968 120 [4,12-4,26] Selbstverteidigung: Hart 1991 351 [1,1-4,26], 355 [4,23-4,24], 356 [4,23-4,26], 382, Boigs 1992 20 [1,1-4,26], Rausch 2000 56 [3,25-4,26], Menhardt 1955/56 237-40 [1,1-4,26] Sexuelles u. Geschlechterbeziehungen: Hafner 1994 97, Hafner 2004 149 Soziologie: Brall 1983b 57 Anm. 75 [1,1-4,26], 63 [3,25-4,26], Pratelidis 1994 54 [4,9-4,26] Sprache: Hoffmann, Werner 1974 58 Sprichwörter u. Sentenzen: Lachmann, K. 1876b 496 [3,25-4,26], Lachmann, K. 1969d 496 [3,25-4,26] Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Lampe 1987b 66 [4,23-4,26], 67 [4,23-4,26], 71-75 [1,1-4,26], Lampe 1987c 154 [1,1-4,26] Stil: Mergell 1943 316 Anm. 4 [4,24-4,26] Der Stricker: Singer, J. 1974 104 [4,9-4,24] Sünde: Wapnewski 1955 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Mockenhaupt 1968 120 [4,12-4,26], Wapnewski 1982 117-23 [3,25-4,26] Syntax: Horacek 1957 427 [4,23-4,24], 436 [4,23-4,24], Gärtner 1969 150 [4,23-4,24] Textkritik: Kratz, H. 1966 75-98 [1,1-4,26] Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Brall 1983a 30 Anm. 73 [1,1-4,26], 33 [3,25-4,26] Traummotivik: Speckenbach 1976 200 Anm. 82 [4,9-4,26] Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 106 [4,15-4,26] Überlieferung: Engels 1970 40, Ulzen 1974 I - 66 [1,1-4,26], Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 120 [4,6-5,18], Menhardt 1955/56 237-40 [1,1-4,26] Übersetzung: Zeydel und Morgan 1951 343 [4,23-4,26], Krohn und Wapnewski 1973 62-69 [1,1-4,26], Mohr 1979q 489, Nellmann 1994c 445 [1,1-4,26], 453, 454, 514 [4,23-4,24] Übersetzungsproblematik: Mohr 1979q 489 Verskunst: Mohr 1979q 489 Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Mohr 1979q 489 elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Richey 1923b 86 [1,1-4,30], Karg, I. 1993b 57, Peschel-Rentsch 1998c 105 [4,23-4,25], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 325 [4,24-4,26], 332, 348 [4,14-4,26], 349 [4,23-4,26] Wagner, Richard: Lampe 1987c 154 [1,1-4,26] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Bumke 2001a 131, Schröder, Werner 2002 151 [4,24-4,25] Wartburgkrieg: Ragotzky 1971 26 Anm. 21 [4,9-4,26] Werkstruktur: Eggers 1953 267 Anm. 16 [1,1-4,26], Wapnewski 1955 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Eggers 1956 89-91 [1,1-4,26], Eggers 1966b 168 Anm. 16 [1,1-4,26], Hempel, H. 1966c 261-76 [4,9-4,26], Haug 1971 700 [3,28-4,26], Nellmann 1971a 393 [4,23-4,24], 394 [4,23-4,24], Poag 1972a 42 [1,1-4,26], 43 [4,23-4,26], 73 [1,1-4,26], 74 [4,9-4,26], Sauer, M. 1981 74 [3,25-4,27], 254 [4,23-4,26], Eggers 1982d 170 Anm. 16 [1,1-4,26], Wapnewski 1982 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Schultz, J. 1983 155 [4,14-4,26], 230 Anm. 36 [4,14-4,26], Haug 1989g 508 [3,28-4,26], Stein, A. 1993 195 [4,23-4,26], Hempel, H. 1951/52 162-80 [4,9-4,26] Willehalm: Schröder, Werner 1975c 282 [4,24-4,25], 284, Wynn 1982 130 Anm. 13 [4,21-4,28], Schäfer, H. 1983 20, Schäfer, H. 1985 24, Schröder, Werner 1989z 420 [4,24-4,25], 422, Kiening 1991 59, 208 Anm. 149, 210 Anm. 159 [4,24-4,26] Wirnt von Grafenberg: Ragotzky 1971 26 Anm. 21 [4,9-4,26] Wittenwiler, Heinrich: Jürgens-Lochthove 1980 74 [4,9-4,26] Wolfram - Biographie: Poag 1972a 42 [1,1-4,26], 43 [4,23-4,26], 73 [1,1-4,26], 74 [4,9-4,26] Wortschatz: Classen 1995e 9 [4,24-4,25] Würfelspielmetaphorik: Hüning 2000 116 [4,19-4,24], Schnyder, M. 2002a 311 [4,23-4,26] Zahlenkomposition: Eggers 1953 267 Anm. 16 [1,1-4,26], Wapnewski 1955 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Eggers 1956 89-91 [1,1-4,26], Eggers 1966b 168 Anm. 16 [1,1-4,26], Eggers 1982d 170 Anm. 16 [1,1-4,26], Wapnewski 1982 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Lampe 1987c 154 [1,1-4,26], Hart 1989 96 [4,23-4,26], 97 [4,23-4,26], Hart 1991 351 [1,1-4,26], 355 [4,23-4,24], 356 [4,23-4,26], 382, Hatto 1952/53 232-36 [1,15-4,26] Zeitverhältnisse: Sauer, M. 1981 74 [3,25-4,27], 254 [4,23-4,26] zwîvel: Hempel, H. 1951 186 [4,9-4,26], Wapnewski 1955 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Hempel, H. 1966b 297 [4,9-4,26], Wapnewski 1982 117-23 [3,25-4,26], Hüning 2000 116 [4,19-4,24]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)