416,19 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 416,18]
Adaptation: Ehrismann, G. 1927 243 Anm. 4 [416,17-416,30], Hilka 1932 731 [416,17-416,19], Wilmotte 1933b 43 Anm. 2 u. 3 [416,17-416,30], Mergell 1943 171 [416,18-416,19], Pastré 1979 372 [416,17-416,30], Stevens, A. 1999 105 [416,17-416,30], Buschinger 2001e 42-43 [416,17-416,21], Bumke 2004 86 [416,19-416,20] âventiure: Nerlich 1997 223-24 [416,17-416,30] Buch VIII: Mohr 1965a 30 [416,18-416,19], Mohr 1979g 129 [416,18-416,19] Charakterisierung: Mohr 1952/53 39 Anm. 6 [415,9-417,8], Mohr 1962b 128 Anm. 6 [415,9-417,8] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Grimm, Walther Ludwig 1897 57-58 [416,19-416,30], Schreiber, A. 1922 145 [416,17-416,30], 195 [416,17-416,30] Erzähler: Nellmann 1973a 33 [416,19-416,20] Erzähltechnik: Schwartzkopff 1909 80 [416,16-417,1], 120-21 Anm. 2 [416,16-417,1], Nellmann 1973a 62 Anm. 59 [416,19-416,20], Urscheler 2002 245 [416,17-416,19] Etymologie: Nellmann 1994c 651 Fiktionalität: Kern, Peter 1993 19 Anm. 39 [416,17-416,30], Green 2002b 79 [416,17-416,30], 81 [416,19-416,30] Gawan-Handlung: Emmel 1951 126 [415,9-418,22] Heinrich von Veldeke: Bruce, James Douglas 1928a 328 [416,19-416,30], Bruce, James Douglas 1958a 328 [416,19-416,30] Humor: Bertau 1977a 128 [416,17-420,30], 130 [416,17-420,30], Bertau 1983d 100 [416,17-420,30], 102 [416,17-420,30] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 988 [416,17-416,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Schirok 1988c 412 [416,18-416,19], Schirok 1990b 140 [416,17-416,30], Schirok 2002a 86 [416,17-416,30] Kyot: Schreiber, A. 1922 137 [416,17-416,30], Ehrismann, G. 1927 234 [416,10-416,30], Bruce, James Douglas 1928a 315 [416,17-416,19], Schreiber, A. 1928 8 Anm. 1 [416,19-416,30], Weber, G. 1928 147 [416,17-416,30], Burdach 1938 512 Anm. 8 [416,17-416,30], Fourquet 1938b 8-9 [416,18-416,30], Stockum 1941 14 [416,17-417,8], Heinermann 1948 132-34 [416,17-416,27], Panzer 1950 20-21 [416,18-416,20], Delbouille 1953 14-15 [416,18-416,30], 21 [416,18-416,30], Zeydel 1953b 25, Hofer 1954 245 [416,17-416,30], Lowet 1955 13 [416,17-416,30], Hatto 1956 167-68 [416,17-417,1], Bruce, James Douglas 1958a 315 [416,17-416,19], Springer 1959 222 [416,19-416,30], Mohr 1966c 48 [416,18-417,1], Kratz, H. 1973a 163 [416,17-416,30], Benkert 1974 5 [416,18-416,30], Burdach 1974 512 Anm. 8 [416,17-416,30], Springer 1975b 183 [416,19-416,30], Faugère 1979 167-68 [416,19-416,30], Fourquet 1979a 44 [416,17-416,19], Mohr 1979i 152 [416,18-417,1], 159 [416,17-416,30], Hatto 1980h 165 [416,17-417,1], Johnson, L. 1983a 196 [416,18-416,30], Ernst 1985 177 [416,19-416,20], Lampe 1987c 48-49 [416,19-416,30], de Mandach 1992 88 [416,17-416,30], 129 Anm. 80 [416,18-416,30], Wyss 1995b 200 [416,18-416,24], Pérez Varas 2000 50 [416,17-416,30], Buschinger 2001a 320 [416,18-416,20], Bumke 2004 86 [416,19-416,20] Liddamus: Gutenbrunner 1955/56 291, Zeydel 1952a 377 Anm. 1 [416,17-416,24] Namen: Lofmark 1965 172 Anm. 23 [416,19-416,20], Mohr 1979q 484, Schröder, Werner 1982b 75, Chandler 1992 180 [416,18-416,20] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 3 [416,19-416,30], 91, Lichtenstein 1897 74, Weber, G. 1928 29 [416,18-416,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 35, Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1983 274 [416,19-416,20], de Mandach 1995 59 [416,17-416,30], 81 Anm. 80 [416,18-416,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Wilmotte 1932b 451 Anm. 3, 451 Anm. 2 [416,17-416,30] Reim: Zwierzina 1900g 10 [416,19-416,20] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Spreckelsen u.a. 1997 623 Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1927 257 Anm. 2 [416,17-416,30] Ritterorden: Nicholson 2001 109 Anm. 20 [416,17-416,30] Schriftlichkeit: Butzer 1995 176-77 [416,17-416,30] Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Stein, W. 1988 133 [416,17-416,30] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 148 [416,16-416,28], Schnell, B. 1989 114 [416,16-416,28], Rolle 2001 74 [416,16-416,28] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Sutter 2003 258 Werkstruktur: Henzen 1951 212 [416,18-416,30], Henzen 1966 150 [416,18-416,30]
	[Zu 416,20]