463,15 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 463,14]
Adaptation: Ehrismann, G. 1927 242 [463,1-465,30], Mergell 1943 212 [463,1-463,30] Anfortas: Willson, H. 1960b 556 Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 55 [461,27-463,30], 68 [461,27-463,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Schreiber, A. 1922 171 [461,27-463,30] Erzähltechnik: Tax 1974a 122 [461,1-463,30], [463,1-464,30], Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 4 [461,28-463,30], Green 1982b 189 Anm. 50 [463,4-463,16], Northcott 1983 428 Anm. 7 [463,1-463,30], Neuendorff 1987a 279 [461,28-463,30], Stein, A. 1993 121 [463,4-463,18], Wolf, A. 1995 46 Anm. 16 [461,27-463,30], Schu 2002 311 [461,27-463,30], Urscheler 2002 220 [462,7-463,30] Erziehung: Blank 1999 219 Anm. 13 [462,11-465,10] Fragen: Janko 1992a 272 [463,15-463,18] Gottfried von Straßburg: Haruta 1978 76 [463,4-463,16], 77 [463,15-463,22] Gral: Riessner 1983/84 20 Anm. 18 [463,4-463,16], Mergell 1951b 8 [463,4-463,23], Mergell 1952b 8 [463,4-463,23], Delcourt-Angélique 1977 123 [463,15-463,18] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 25 [463,15-465,6], Wapnewski 1982 25 [463,15-465,6], Wand 1989 254 Anm. 504 [461,27-463,30] Heidentum: Schreiber, A. 1922 171 [461,27-463,30] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Rahn 1933 112 [463,15-463,16] Individualität: Sosna 2003 203 Anm. 91 [461,28-463,30] Interpretation: Scholte 1934b 14 [463,15-463,16], Weber, G. 1948 67 [463,1-465,30], Springer 1959 233 [461,27-467,10], Adolf 1960 195 Anm. 4 [463,15-465,10], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1963 31, 71 [463,4-464,22], Huth 1972 362 [456,28-466,6], 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 293 [463,1-463,30], Gnädinger 1974 67 Anm. 49 [463,15-463,16], Poag 1974a 278 Anm. 3 [463,1-463,30], Dewald 1975 216 Anm. 55 [463,14-463,15], Springer 1975b 196 [461,27-467,10], Ruh 1980 93 [463,4-467,18], Huber, H. 1981 273 Anm. 235 [463,15-463,16], Waldmann 1983 19 Anm. 1 [463,4-464,22], Wynn 1984 280 [463,4-465,6], Schirok 1987a 62 [463,4-463,16], Schmid, E. 1993b 187 [463,4-463,30], Nellmann 1994c 673 [463,4-463,16], Pratelidis 1994 181 [463,15-465,10], Gilmour 2000 165 [463,15-463,16] Interpunktion: Bech 1862 298 [463,15-463,16], Bech 1879 297-98 [463,15-463,16] Kyot: Schreiber, A. 1928 23 [463,15-463,18] Lesarten: Bech 1862 298 [463,15-463,16] Lichtmetaphorik: Cessari 2000 121 [463,15-463,22], 138 Anm. 193 [461,28-463,30], 139 Anm. 195 [463,15-463,30] Memoria: Ridder 1999 36 [463,4-463,16] Metrik: Bech 1862 298 [463,15-463,16] Minne u. Ehe: Kleber, J. 1992b 297 [463,15-463,16] Namen: Müller, M. 2003 137 [463,1-463,30] neutrale Engel: Willson, H. 1964 52 [463,4-463,16] Orient: Kunitzsch 1969b 195 Anm. 8 [463,4-463,30], 204 Anm. 30 [463,4-463,16], Kunitzsch 1996c 9 Anm. 8 [463,4-463,30], 18 Anm. 30 [463,4-463,16] Pädagogik: Essen 1967 106 [463,4-463,15] Philologie: Hundsnurscher 1972 433, Schmidt, E. 1979 480 Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 235 [463,4-464,22], Rachbauer 1970 235 [463,4-464,22], Rachbauer 1980 235 [463,4-464,22] Rätsel: Tomasek 1994 213 [463,1-463,22] Religion: San-Marte 1861 45 [463,15-463,16], 54, 74, Sattler 1895 44 [463,15-463,16], Lichtenstein 1897 66 [463,1-465,30], Singer, S. 1898a 374 [463,15-463,16], Schreiber, A. 1922 171 [461,27-463,30], Mockenhaupt 1942 89 [463,15-463,16], 93 [463,15-465,10], 96 [461,28-463,30], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 59 [463,4-464,20], Koppitz 1959 111 [463,4-463,16], 116 [463,15-464,22], 339 [463,4-463,16], 382 Anm. 136 [461,28-463,30], 386 Anm. 163 [463,15-463,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 89 [463,15-463,16], 93 [463,15-465,10], 96 [461,28-463,30], Haas, A. 1969 209 [463,15-464,22], Knapp, F. 1970 48 [463,15-463,16], Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 547 Anm. 33 [463,4-463,16], Groos 1974a 363 [463,15-465,10], Haas, A. 1979b 42 [463,15-464,22], Singer, S. 1985 374 [463,15-463,16], Gnädinger 1999 197 Anm. 62 [463,1-463,30], Sivertson 1999a 35 [460,28-467,10] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Jürgens-Lochthove 1980 149 [461,27-463,30], Remakel 1995 93 Anm. 275 [463,4-463,16] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 158 [463,1-463,30], 226 [463,4-463,16] Rhetorik: Lutz, E. 1984 171 Anm. 4 [463,4-463,16] Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 427 [463,4-465,30], 434 [463,1-464,22], Keferstein 1937a 76 Anm. 1 et seq. [461,27-463,30] Rittertum: Neudeck 1994b 74 [463,15-465,10] Schuld: Maurer 1950 310 [463,1-464,30], Maurer 1966 56 [463,1-464,30] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 388 [461,27-463,30] Sünde: Maurer 1951b 153 [462,19-463,30] Textkritik: Bech 1862 298 [463,15-463,16], Bech 1879 297-98 [463,15-463,16] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 271 [463,4-463,30] Überlieferung: Nellmann 1966 327 [463,15-463,16], 333 [463,15-463,16], 341 [463,15-463,16], Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 111 [463,5-463,25] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 52 [462,11-463,30], Delabar 1990 299 [463,15-463,19] Werkstruktur: Meyer, H. 1947 19 [463,1-464,22] Wortsinn: Gilmour 2000 117 [463,15-463,16]
	[Zu 463,16]