467,22 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Rachbauer 1934 248 [467,20-467,22], 249 [467,19-467,24], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [467,20-470,8], Mergell 1943 240 [467,11-467,30], Rachbauer 1970 248 [467,20-467,22], 249 [467,19-467,24], Rachbauer 1980 248 [467,20-467,22], 249 [467,19-467,24] Buch IX: Tax 1974a 122 [465,1-467,30], Schirok 1976 55 [467,22-467,24], Dick, E. 1983a 65 [467,21-468,10], 66 [467,21-467,24], 87 Tab. 1 [467,11-468,20], Neuendorff 1987a 279 [467,20-467,24], 283 [467,19-467,27] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 56 [467,20-467,24], 64, 127 s. auch Anm. 58 Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 240 [467,11-467,30], Ortmann 1972 56 [467,20-467,24], 64, 127 s. auch Anm. 58, Tax 1974a 122 [465,1-467,30], Hirschberg 1976 306 Anm. 48 [467,1-467,30], Schirok 1976 55 [467,22-467,24], Green 1982b 189 Anm. 50 [467,20-467,24], Neuendorff 1987a 279 [467,20-467,24], 283 [467,19-467,27] Erziehung: Grosse 1962 61 [467,22-467,24] ethischer Wortschatz: Maurer 1951b 136-37 [467,19-467,24], Wapnewski 1955 77 [467,20-467,24], Wapnewski 1982 77 [467,20-467,24] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] französischer Wortschatz: Suolahti 1933 312 Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 192 [467,19-467,24] genâde: Falk 1985c 172 [465,1-468,30] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 295 [467,19-467,24] Gottfried von Straßburg: Bayer, Hans 1978 44 Anm. 18 [467,21-467,24] Gral: Weber, G. 1948 66 [466,1-467,30], 67, [466,1-467,30], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 56 [467,19-467,24], 58 [467,19-468,18], Bayer, Hans 1983 134 Anm. 364 [467,21-467,24], Falk 1985c 172 [465,1-468,30] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 77 [467,20-467,24], Wapnewski 1982 77 [467,20-467,24] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 325 [466,1-467,30], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 56 [467,19-467,24], 58 [467,19-468,18], Bayer, Hans 1978 44 Anm. 18 [467,21-467,24], Katann 1957/58 325 [466,1-467,30] Hilfe u. Rat: Sullivan, J. 2001 28 [467,22-467,24] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Gephart 1994 153 [467,20-467,24] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 66 [466,1-467,30], 67, [466,1-467,30], Maurer 1951b 136-37 [467,19-467,24], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Green 1982b 189 Anm. 50 [467,20-467,24] Kommunikation: Classen 2002a 273 [467,20-467,24] Kyot: Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 56 [467,19-467,24], 58 [467,19-468,18] Minne u. Ehe: Wapnewski 1955 77 [467,20-467,24], Poag 1968a 210-11 [467,19-468,14], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wapnewski 1982 77 [467,20-467,24], Kleber, J. 1992b 300, [467,19-467,24] Philologie: Fisher, R. 1982 229 Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 77 [467,20-467,24], Wapnewski 1982 77 [467,20-467,24] Quellen - allgemein: Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [467,20-470,8], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 56 [467,19-467,24], 58 [467,19-468,18] Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 248 [467,20-467,22], 249 [467,19-467,24], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [467,20-470,8], Rachbauer 1970 248 [467,20-467,22], 249 [467,19-467,24], Rachbauer 1980 248 [467,20-467,22], 249 [467,19-467,24] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Gephart 1994 153 [467,20-467,24] Reim: Dick, E. 1983a 65 [467,21-468,10], 66 [467,21-467,24], 87 Tab. 1 [467,11-468,20] Religion: Weber, G. 1935 29 [467,22-467,24], Weber, G. 1948 66 [466,1-467,30], 67, [466,1-467,30], Wapnewski 1955 77 [467,20-467,24], Koppitz 1959 485 Anm. 389, Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 56 [467,19-467,24], 58 [467,19-468,18], Groos 1975a 57 [465,1-467,30], Wapnewski 1982 77 [467,20-467,24], Bayer, Hans 1983 134 Anm. 364 [467,21-467,24] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 192 [467,19-467,24] Ritterethik: Mohr 1951/52 153 [467,20-467,24], Maurer 1951b 136-37 [467,19-467,24], Mohr 1962a 201 [467,20-467,24], Poag 1968a 210-11 [467,19-468,14], Mohr 1970 341 [467,20-467,24], Mohr 1979c 23 [467,20-467,24], Mohr 1951/52 153 [467,20-467,24] Schuld: Maurer 1950 318 [467,19-467,24], Mohr 1962a 201 [467,20-467,24], Maurer 1966 67 [467,19-467,24], Mohr 1970 341 [467,20-467,24], Mohr 1979c 23 [467,20-467,24], Mohr 1951/52 153 [467,20-467,24] Sexuelles u. Geschlechterbeziehungen: Bayer, Hans 1983 134 Anm. 364 [467,21-467,24] Sprachgeschichte: Maurer 1951b 136-37 [467,19-467,24] Stil: Mergell 1943 240 [467,11-467,30] Sünde: Maurer 1950 318 [467,19-467,24], Maurer 1951b 136-37 [467,19-467,24], Wapnewski 1955 77 [467,20-467,24], Maurer 1966 67 [467,19-467,24], Wapnewski 1982 77 [467,20-467,24], Falk 1985c 172 [465,1-468,30] Trevrizent: Tax 1974a 122 [465,1-467,30] Übersetzung: Mustard und Passage 1961 xliv [467,1-468,30] Übersetzungsproblematik: Ganz 1985a 391 [467,11-467,30] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 52 [467,19-467,30] Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 77 [467,20-467,24], Poag 1968a 210-11 [467,19-468,14], Hirschberg 1976 306 Anm. 48 [467,1-467,30], Schirok 1976 55 [467,22-467,24], Wapnewski 1982 77 [467,20-467,24], Dick, E. 1983a 65 [467,21-468,10], 66 [467,21-467,24], 87 Tab. 1 [467,11-468,20] Wortschatz: Schultheiß 1937 52 [467,19-467,30] Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 77 [467,20-467,24], Schirok 1976 55 [467,22-467,24], Wapnewski 1982 77 [467,20-467,24], Dick, E. 1983a 65 [467,21-468,10], 66 [467,21-467,24], 87 Tab. 1 [467,11-468,20] Zeitverhältnisse: Groos 1975a 57 [465,1-467,30] zwîvel: Wapnewski 1955 77 [467,20-467,24], Wapnewski 1982 77 [467,20-467,24]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)