475, 2 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 1 [475,1-476,30], Rachbauer 1934 238 [474,23-475,3], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [474,26-475,30], Snelleman 1941 51-52 [474,25-475,4], 54 [475,2-475,3], Mergell 1943 214 [474,25-475,4], 215-16 [474,25-475,3], 240 [474,25-475,12], Rachbauer 1970 238 [474,23-475,3], Pastré 1979 377 [472,21-478,4], Rachbauer 1980 238 [474,23-475,3] Bildungsroman: Sauer, P. 2000 192 Anm. 445 [474,1-476,30] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 275 [475,2-475,4] Buch IX: Faust 1903/04 280 [473,4-475,12], 289 [473,5-477,30], Horacek 1972 216 [474,23-477,19], Tax 1974a 120 s. auch Anm. 4 [475,1-475,30], 122 [475,1-476,30], Schirok 1976 59 [474,27-475,12], 68 [475,2-475,12], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [475,1-475,30], Neuendorff 1987a 279 [474,27-475,12], Faust 1903/04 280 [473,4-475,12], 289 [473,5-477,30] Charakterisierung: Schröder, J. 2004 270 [475,1-475,3] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Boigs 1984 12 [473,5-476,30], 14 [473,5-476,30], Sutter 2003 219-20 [474,7-478,6] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 214 [474,25-475,4], 215-16 [474,25-475,3], 240 [474,25-475,12], Tax 1974a 120 s. auch Anm. 4 [475,1-475,30], 122 [475,1-476,30], Dewald 1975 275 [475,2-475,4], Schirok 1976 59 [474,27-475,12], 68 [475,2-475,12], Green 1980b 133 Anm. 136 [475,2-475,3], Ruh 1980 93 [474,25-475,12], Sauer, M. 1981 243 Anm. 2 [474,27-475,12], Green 1982b 190 [474,27-475,3], 197 [475,2-475,12], 198 [475,2-475,12], 199 [475,2-475,3], 202 [475,2-475,3], Neuendorff 1987a 279 [474,27-475,12], Stein, A. 1993 93 [475,2-475,12], Schu 2002 312 [475,2-476,18] Erziehung: Sauer, P. 2000 192 Anm. 445 [474,1-476,30] ethischer Wortschatz: Wapnewski 1955 156 [474,26-475,3], Wapnewski 1982 156 [474,26-475,3] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Gattung: Schu 2002 312 [475,2-476,18] Gawan: Shockey 2002 157 [474,1-475,12] Gawan-Handlung: Sauer, M. 1981 243 Anm. 2 [474,27-475,12] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 159 [474,26-475,3], 297 [473,22-475,12], 310 [474,26-475,12], Ruh 1980 93 [474,25-475,12], McFarland 2000 61 [474,27-475,20] Geschichte: Snelleman 1941 51-52 [474,25-475,4], 54 [475,2-475,3] Gewalt: Classen 2003d 252 [475,1-476,30] Gral: Weber, G. 1948 61 [475,1-475,12], Mockenhaupt 1968 53 [474,30-475,3], Dewald 1975 275 [475,2-475,4] Grammatik: Adelberg 1960 111 [474,27-475,4] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 156 [474,26-475,3], Wapnewski 1982 156 [474,26-475,3] Heinrich von dem Türlin: Shockey 2002 157 [474,1-475,12] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 270 [475,1-475,3] höfischer Roman: Schu 2002 312 [475,2-476,18] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 61 [475,1-475,12], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Dewald 1975 275 [475,2-475,4], Gibbs 1979 201, Ruh 1980 93 [474,25-475,12], Sauer, M. 1981 243 Anm. 2 [474,27-475,12], Green 1982b 190 [474,27-475,3], 197 [475,2-475,12], 198 [475,2-475,12], 199 [475,2-475,3], 202 [475,2-475,3], Wynn 1984 278 [474,27-475,12], 285 [474,27-475,12], Wynn 1991 117 [474,27-475,12], Stein, A. 1993 93 [475,2-475,12], Gilmour 1997 331 Anm. 79 [475,2-475,3], Shockey 2002 157 [474,1-475,12], Faust 1903/04 280 [473,4-475,12], 289 [473,5-477,30] Lesarten: Gilmour 1997 331 Anm. 79 [475,2-475,3] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 975 [474,25-476,11], Ruh 1980 93 [474,25-475,12], Bertau 1972/73 975 [474,25-476,11] Minne u. Ehe: Wapnewski 1955 156 [474,26-475,3], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Dewald 1975 275 [475,2-475,4], Wapnewski 1982 156 [474,26-475,3] Namen: Green 1980b 133 Anm. 136 [475,2-475,3] Orgeluse: Dieterich 2000 37 Anm. 125 Orient: Snelleman 1941 51-52 [474,25-475,4], 54 [475,2-475,3] Pädagogik: Sauer, P. 2000 192 Anm. 445 [474,1-476,30] Philologie: Gilmour 1997 331 Anm. 79 [475,2-475,3] Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 156 [474,26-475,3], Wapnewski 1982 156 [474,26-475,3] Quellen - allgemein: Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [474,26-475,30], Snelleman 1941 51-52 [474,25-475,4], 54 [475,2-475,3] Quellen - Chrétien: Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 1 [475,1-476,30], Rachbauer 1934 238 [474,23-475,3], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [474,26-475,30], Rachbauer 1970 238 [474,23-475,3], Rachbauer 1980 238 [474,23-475,3], Sutter 2003 219-20 [474,7-478,6] Raum u. Bewegung: Shockey 2002 157 [474,1-475,12] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Religion: Weber, G. 1935 26 [475,1-475,30], Mockenhaupt 1942 53 [474,30-475,3], Weber, G. 1948 61 [475,1-475,12], Wapnewski 1955 156 [474,26-475,3], Mockenhaupt 1968 53 [474,30-475,3], Wapnewski 1982 156 [474,26-475,3] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Shockey 2002 157 [474,1-475,12] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 32 [468,12-486,14] Rhetorik: Pastré 1979 377 [472,21-478,4] Ritterethik: Mockenhaupt 1968 53 [474,30-475,3] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Schröder, J. 2004 270 [475,1-475,3] Rittertum: Groos 1975b 258 [474,1-475,12], Green 1978a 68 [475,2-475,4], Classen 2003d 252 [475,1-476,30] Schicksal u. Fortuna: Dieterich 2000 37 Anm. 125 Schuld: Mockenhaupt 1968 53 [474,30-475,3] Sprache: Dewald 1975 275 [475,2-475,4] Stil: Mergell 1943 214 [474,25-475,4], 215-16 [474,25-475,3], 240 [474,25-475,12] Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 275 [475,2-475,4] Sünde: Wapnewski 1955 156 [474,26-475,3], Mockenhaupt 1968 53 [474,30-475,3], Wapnewski 1982 156 [474,26-475,3] Titurel: Ruh 1980 93 [474,25-475,12] Trevrizent: Tax 1974a 120 s. auch Anm. 4 [475,1-475,30], 122 [475,1-476,30] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 135 [474,30-476,2] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 16 [474,27-475,3], Bertau 1983i 200, Delabar 1990 282 Anm. 12 & 13 [473,22-475,4], Sutter 2003 219-20 [474,7-478,6] Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 156 [474,26-475,3], Maurer 1969c 230 [475,1-475,30], Maurer 1971f 444 [475,1-475,30], Horacek 1972 216 [474,23-477,19], Schirok 1976 59 [474,27-475,12], 68 [475,2-475,12], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [475,1-475,30], Sauer, M. 1981 243 Anm. 2 [474,27-475,12], Wapnewski 1982 156 [474,26-475,3], Stein, A. 1993 93 [475,2-475,12], Faust 1903/04 280 [473,4-475,12], 289 [473,5-477,30] Willehalm: Ruh 1980 93 [474,25-475,12] Wolfram - Biographie: Ruh 1980 93 [474,25-475,12] Wortschatz: Schultheiß 1937 16 [474,27-475,3] Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 156 [474,26-475,3], Schirok 1976 59 [474,27-475,12], 68 [475,2-475,12], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [475,1-475,30], Wapnewski 1982 156 [474,26-475,3] Zeitverhältnisse: Sauer, M. 1981 243 Anm. 2 [474,27-475,12], Sutter 2003 219-20 [474,7-478,6] zwîvel: Wapnewski 1955 156 [474,26-475,3], Wapnewski 1982 156 [474,26-475,3]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)