476,23 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 38 [476,21-476,24], Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 1 [475,1-476,30], Kellermann, W. 1936 107 [476,12-476,30], Mergell 1943 217 [476,12-476,30], Henzen 1958 436 Anm. 1, Pastré 1979 377 [472,21-478,4], Johnson, L. 2000 185 Anm. 11 [476,12-476,30] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1 Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 592 [476,12-477,30] Bildungsroman: Sauer, P. 2000 192 Anm. 445 [474,1-476,30] Blutstropfenepisode: Bumke 2001a 87 Anm. 188 [476,22-476,29] Buch IX: Faust 1903/04 289 [473,5-477,30], Horacek 1972 216 [474,23-477,19], Tax 1974a 122 [475,1-476,30], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [476,1-476,30], Faust 1903/04 289 [473,5-477,30] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1, Pastré 1994e 229 [476,12-476,30] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1 Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Weichselbaumer 2003 197 [475,19-477,21] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Matz 1907 52, Bertau 1972 88 Anm. 61 [476,12-479,27], Groos 1981a 46 [476,23-476,24], 49 [476,20-476,26], Bertau 1983c 40 Anm. 27 [476,12-479,27], Boigs 1984 12 [473,5-476,30], 14 [473,5-476,30], Sutter 2003 203 [475,19-478,7], 219-20 [474,7-478,6] Erzähler: Groos 1981a 46 [476,23-476,24], 49 [476,20-476,26] Erzähltechnik: Gerz 1930 66 [476,20-476,30], Mergell 1943 217 [476,12-476,30], Gerz 1967 66 [476,20-476,30], Harroff 1974 63 [476,1-478,30], Tax 1974a 122 [475,1-476,30], Schmid, E. 1976 97 Anm. 147 [476,12-477,25], 101 Anm. 153 [476,12-477,5], Green 1982b 186 Anm. 39, Groos 1995 223 [476,23-476,24], 226 [476,21-476,24], Urscheler 2002 53 Erziehung: Sauer, P. 2000 192 Anm. 445 [474,1-476,30] ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 127, Wapnewski 1955 184, Wapnewski 1982 184 Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1 Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 344 [476,1-477,30] Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1 Gattung: Groos 1995 223 [476,23-476,24], 226 [476,21-476,24] Gawan: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1 genâde: Falk 1985c 168 [476,12-476,30] Gesamtwürdigung: Sacker 1963 47 [475,13-476,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 298 [476,23-476,30] Geschichte: Roßkopf 1972 259 >, Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30] Gewalt: Classen 2003d 252 [475,1-476,30] Gottfried von Straßburg: Bayer, Hans 1978 14 Gral: San-Marte 1861 127, Weber, G. 1948 61 [476,10-476,30], Frappier 1977b 28 Anm. 16 [476,12-478,7], Falk 1985c 168 [476,12-476,30], Haferland 1994a 24 [476,12-477,21] Grammatik: Adelberg 1960 152 [476,10-476,26] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 184, Wapnewski 1982 184 Herrschaft: Pastré 1994e 229 [476,12-476,30] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1, Heckel, S. 1999 50 Anm. 37 [476,12-476,30] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 326 [476,1-476,30], Bayer, Hans 1978 14, Katann 1957/58 326 [476,1-476,30] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1 indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1994e 229 [476,12-476,30] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 61 [476,10-476,30], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952a 183 [476,12-476,30], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1953a 24 [476,12-476,30], Bertau 1972 88 Anm. 61 [476,12-479,27], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 259 >, Schröder, Walter Johannes 1978d 213 [476,12-476,30], Green 1982b 186 Anm. 39, Bertau 1983c 40 Anm. 27 [476,12-479,27], Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30], Schmid, E. 1986 204 [476,10-477,12], Groos 1995 223 [476,23-476,24], 226 [476,21-476,24], Faust 1903/04 289 [473,5-477,30] Ither: Roßkopf 1972 259 > Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 199 Anm. 792 [476,13-478,7], 213 Anm. 862 [476,12-476,30] Jüngerer Titurel: Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30] Kommentar: Nellmann 1994c 592 [476,12-477,30] Kommunikation: Urscheler 2002 53 Kyot: Wolfart und San-Marte 1861 141, Lichtenstein 1897 38 [476,21-476,24], Haferland 1994a 24 [476,12-477,21] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 781 [476,12-477,30], Ehrismann, G. 1927 290 [476,12-478,6], Bertau 1972 88 Anm. 61 [476,12-479,27], Bertau 1983c 40 Anm. 27 [476,12-479,27], Bertau 1972/73 781 [476,12-477,30] Männer (allgemein): Weichselbaumer 2003 197 [475,19-477,21] Memoria: Remscheid 1999 176 [476,10-478,7] Minne u. Ehe: Wapnewski 1955 184, Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wapnewski 1982 184, Kleber, J. 1992b 309 [476,12-476,30] Moriaen: Wells, D. 1971a 258 [476,10-476,26] Namen: Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30] Naturwissenschaft: Groos 1995 223 [476,23-476,24], 226 [476,21-476,24] Pädagogik: Sauer, P. 2000 192 Anm. 445 [474,1-476,30] Parzival: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1 Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 184, Wapnewski 1982 184 Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 38 [476,21-476,24], Griffith 1911 94-115 [475,20-476,30], Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30], Haferland 1994a 24 [476,12-477,21], Pastré 1994e 229 [476,12-476,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 38 [476,21-476,24], Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 1 [475,1-476,30], Bertau 1983c 40 Anm. 27 [476,12-479,27], Sutter 2003 203 [475,19-478,7], 219-20 [474,7-478,6] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Matz 1907 52 Reim: Matz 1907 52 Religion: San-Marte 1861 127, Weber, G. 1948 61 [476,10-476,30], Wapnewski 1955 184, Wapnewski 1982 184, Groos 1995 223 [476,23-476,24], 226 [476,21-476,24] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 344 [476,1-477,30], Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 32 [468,12-486,14], Strässle 2001 311 Anm. 376 [476,10-476,30] Rhetorik: Pastré 1979 377 [472,21-478,4] Rittertum: Pastré 1994e 229 [476,12-476,30], Groos 1995 223 [476,23-476,24], 226 [476,21-476,24], Classen 2003d 252 [475,1-476,30] Schionatulander: Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30] Schriftlichkeit: Haferland 1994a 24 [476,12-477,21] Schuld: Kellermann, W. 1936 107 [476,12-476,30] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 38 [476,21-476,24], Riemer, G. 1906 76, Mergell 1943 217 [476,12-476,30] Suche: Harroff 1974 63 [476,1-478,30] Sünde: Wapnewski 1955 184, Wapnewski 1982 184, Falk 1985c 168 [476,12-476,30] Tiere u. Tiersymbolik: Hatto 1968/69 17 [476,23-476,28], Hatto 1980d 184 [476,23-476,28], Hatto 1968/69 17 [476,23-476,28] Titurel: Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30] Traummotivik: Roßkopf 1972 259 >, Hatto 1980d 184 [476,23-476,28], Hatto 1968/69 17 [476,23-476,28] Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 296 Anm. 1, Tax 1974a 122 [475,1-476,30] triuwe: Schmid, E. 1976 97 Anm. 147 [476,12-477,25], 101 Anm. 153 [476,12-477,5] Tugenden: Henzen 1958 436 Anm. 1 tumpheit: Strässle 2001 311 Anm. 376 [476,10-476,30] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 119 [476,3-478,10], 135 [476,11-477,13] Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 592 [476,12-477,30] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Harroff 1974 63 [476,1-478,30], Schmid, E. 1986 204 [476,10-477,12], Sutter 2003 203 [475,19-478,7], 219-20 [474,7-478,6] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Bumke 2001a 87 Anm. 188 [476,22-476,29] Wappenkunde: Hatto 1980d 184 [476,23-476,28], Hatto 1968/69 17 [476,23-476,28] Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 184, Horacek 1972 216 [474,23-477,19], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [476,1-476,30], Wapnewski 1982 184, Faust 1903/04 289 [473,5-477,30] Wortschatz: Schmidt, C. 1898a 33, Riemer, G. 1906 76 Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 184, Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [476,1-476,30], Wapnewski 1982 184 Zeitverhältnisse: Sutter 2003 203 [475,19-478,7], 219-20 [474,7-478,6] zwîvel: Wapnewski 1955 184, Wapnewski 1982 184
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)